Author Topic: New feature: Stickied posts within threads  (Read 955 times)

Offline Prime32

  • Over-Underling
  • Head Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
    • View Profile
New feature: Stickied posts within threads
« on: June 30, 2017, 03:46:50 PM »
Within a thread you've started, post a reply and put (Continued) at the start of the Subject field - it will be stickied underneath the OP. This works everywhere on the boards, but you can't sticky a post in someone else's thread. Should be useful for Handbooks and similar threads.

This feature was available on the temporary boards, but it might not have got a lot of attention.

Offline SorO_Lost

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 6999
  • I'll kill you before you're born.
    • View Profile
Re: New feature: Stickied posts within threads
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2017, 10:37:34 AM »
I'll have to play with it later, sounds like a good alternative for handling discussions.

Love your Avatar to, it is intentional?
(at the time of posting, it's an icon saying to upgrade your account for 3rd party hosting)
Would you die if you jumped from my perceived ego to your IQ? - Is 15secs of confirmation bias a goal post worth arguing for? - Ever asked a "victim" what they did to deserve it? - Are the words teen, SJW, & liberal synonyms? - "Only Sith deals in absolutes" contains a misspelled word.

Offline Stratovarius

  • Forum Host
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6301
  • Arhosan Emperor
    • View Profile
Re: New feature: Stickied posts within threads
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2017, 10:40:48 AM »
Photobucket recently banned linking to 3rd party sites unless you pay $40 a month.

Offline SorO_Lost

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 6999
  • I'll kill you before you're born.
    • View Profile
Re: New feature: Stickied posts within threads
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2017, 11:39:25 AM »
Photobucket recently banned linking to 3rd party sites unless you pay $40 a month.
They really must be sinking then since they are going to try capitalizing on people being too lazy to move to a new host. They will get some of course, but most will jump ship if they haven't already.

It's probably a brand deal I suppose, maybe they own Pinterest or something so losing new users isn't a big deal opposed to the profit gained from exploiting a few.
Would you die if you jumped from my perceived ego to your IQ? - Is 15secs of confirmation bias a goal post worth arguing for? - Ever asked a "victim" what they did to deserve it? - Are the words teen, SJW, & liberal synonyms? - "Only Sith deals in absolutes" contains a misspelled word.