Author Topic: Affiliations Discussion  (Read 28891 times)

Offline Garryl

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4508
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #20 on: July 12, 2012, 10:27:25 AM »
Since the current topic of discussion revolves around the Red Lotus, I'll tackle that next.

(click to show/hide)

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13393
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #21 on: July 12, 2012, 11:09:49 AM »
I'd like to see the Chorrun Char get an update.  It need a bonus for having the dragonblood subtype, and its capstone is very dependent on having draconic feats which most True Dragons wouldn't have anyway.

Offline TravelLog

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
  • Gunslinger, Descendent of Eld
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #22 on: July 12, 2012, 12:24:05 PM »
More Red Lotus (I'll also add Dreaming Apothecary to this post later)
(click to show/hide)
Too much sanity may be madness and the maddest of all, to see life as it is and not as it should be.
--Miguel de Cervantes

Offline Garryl

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4508
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #23 on: July 12, 2012, 02:08:06 PM »
I'd like to see the Chorrun Char get an update.  It need a bonus for having the dragonblood subtype, and its capstone is very dependent on having draconic feats which most True Dragons wouldn't have anyway.

Since Chorrun Char requires having the Dragon type or the Dragonblood subtype to even enter, and gives a boost for having the Dragon type proper, that would be kind of pointless (no matter how you enter the affiliation, you'd have a free +1 to your score or whatever).

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13393
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #24 on: July 12, 2012, 02:14:46 PM »
I'd like to see the Chorrun Char get an update.  It need a bonus for having the dragonblood subtype, and its capstone is very dependent on having draconic feats which most True Dragons wouldn't have anyway.

Since Chorrun Char requires having the Dragon type or the Dragonblood subtype to even enter, and gives a boost for having the Dragon type proper, that would be kind of pointless (no matter how you enter the affiliation, you'd have a free +1 to your score or whatever).

I completely missed that.  However, the point still stands that no actual dragon is going to take Draconic feats.

Offline sirpercival

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 10855
  • you can't escape the miles
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #25 on: July 12, 2012, 02:49:05 PM »
I'd like to see the Chorrun Char get an update.  It need a bonus for having the dragonblood subtype, and its capstone is very dependent on having draconic feats which most True Dragons wouldn't have anyway.

Since Chorrun Char requires having the Dragon type or the Dragonblood subtype to even enter, and gives a boost for having the Dragon type proper, that would be kind of pointless (no matter how you enter the affiliation, you'd have a free +1 to your score or whatever).

I completely missed that.  However, the point still stands that no actual dragon is going to take Draconic feats.

True.  As I said, Chorrun Char shall be updated!
I am the assassin of productivity

(member in good standing of the troll-feeders guild)

It's begun — my things have overgrown the previous sig.

Offline sirpercival

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 10855
  • you can't escape the miles
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #26 on: July 12, 2012, 03:26:43 PM »
For the Delvers, I'd remove the affiliation penalty for killing other Delvers. Most of that should fall under actively preventing exploration of the Dungeon, anyways, and it should be possible to fight other Delvers (especially what with the High Arcana games). I'd also like to see a more granular granting of benefits (see the revised Brotherhood of Redemption for a good example).

I can take those two penalties out, but then technically I need two more.  Any suggestions?  I'm also not sure what you mean about "more granular".

Quote
For the Watch, you've got +1/feat on the Lawful alignment line.
I might only give the 100g/month salary at Constable when you actually do some active duty (say, 30-40 hours/week; the Watch appreciates individuals willing to put in the extra effort, but not enough to pay them more).
Sergeant and Lieutenant need revamping. Having some fixed-level cohorts just isn't fun if that's all you get.
Fixed the alignment line.

How's that for Sgt & Lt?
I am the assassin of productivity

(member in good standing of the troll-feeders guild)

It's begun — my things have overgrown the previous sig.

Offline Garryl

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4508
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #27 on: July 12, 2012, 07:08:15 PM »
Lieutenant is probably a bit excessive. Too easy to scale up really high.

Not 100% sure what I meant with the granular thing (being sick will do that). I think it was a request for the mechanical benefits to be spread out a bit more evenly among he ranks (and I'm not quite sure how getting Resurrection insurance counts along those lines). Also, related, the scroll/potion requisitioning that some of the affiliations have should probably be by a gp limit, rather than spell level, otherwise someone will requisition a potion of CL 1000000 Mage Armor or something.

Offline sirpercival

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 10855
  • you can't escape the miles
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #28 on: July 13, 2012, 12:12:19 PM »
This now has its own thread.
I am the assassin of productivity

(member in good standing of the troll-feeders guild)

It's begun — my things have overgrown the previous sig.

Offline sirpercival

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 10855
  • you can't escape the miles
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #29 on: July 13, 2012, 12:54:32 PM »
Lieutenant is probably a bit excessive. Too easy to scale up really high.
OK, I scaled it back.  Too much?

Quote
Not 100% sure what I meant with the granular thing (being sick will do that). I think it was a request for the mechanical benefits to be spread out a bit more evenly among he ranks (and I'm not quite sure how getting Resurrection insurance counts along those lines). Also, related, the scroll/potion requisitioning that some of the affiliations have should probably be by a gp limit, rather than spell level, otherwise someone will requisition a potion of CL 1000000 Mage Armor or something.
I'm not sure either, but the mechanical benefits I think work ok if you ignore the Rez insurance.  And I put a general note at the top enforcing minimum CLs for those things.
I am the assassin of productivity

(member in good standing of the troll-feeders guild)

It's begun — my things have overgrown the previous sig.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13393
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #30 on: July 13, 2012, 12:56:17 PM »
Soo...when are the rest of the caster affiliations going to be fixed so I can pick one?   :P

Offline sirpercival

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 10855
  • you can't escape the miles
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #31 on: July 13, 2012, 12:57:49 PM »
Soo...when are the rest of the caster affiliations going to be fixed so I can pick one?   :P

I'm working on the Magi as we speak.
I am the assassin of productivity

(member in good standing of the troll-feeders guild)

It's begun — my things have overgrown the previous sig.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13393
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #32 on: July 13, 2012, 12:58:47 PM »
Hooray!   :love

Offline sirpercival

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 10855
  • you can't escape the miles
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #33 on: July 13, 2012, 01:25:29 PM »
Alright, Magi are done.
I am the assassin of productivity

(member in good standing of the troll-feeders guild)

It's begun — my things have overgrown the previous sig.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13393
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #34 on: July 13, 2012, 02:05:29 PM »
Looks good.

Offline Garryl

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4508
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #35 on: July 13, 2012, 03:00:17 PM »
I'd cap the Lieutenant at 1, 2, or 3, personally. Any more than that and you're really getting beyond what an affiliation benefit should give, even if it does take a little effort to get it.

Dreaming Apothecary here. I'm very interested in what you've got for them, TravelLog.
(click to show/hide)


Killraven Crime League. I'm getting a bit of a thug/biker gang vibe from them, as opposed to the "classic mafia" that Calasper gives off.
(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: July 13, 2012, 07:01:36 PM by Garryl »

Offline TravelLog

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
  • Gunslinger, Descendent of Eld
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #36 on: July 13, 2012, 04:23:07 PM »
For the DA, I'm getting a ruthless, monopolizing merchant feel, with a hint of mystery. Also, I would make the bonus ont fr manifesting as infusions. There are too many affiliations that give casting bonuses as is.

One Time
Craft Mythal, Craft Portal feat: +1 (extra on top of meta creation bonus)
Ability to alter a creature's dreams: +1
5 ranks in Lucid Dreaming (Hyperconscious): +1
Has the Dream domain: +1

Multiple Use
Design a new magic item: +1
Steals the secrets to a new magic item and ensures no others can replicate it: +2
Learns/steals the secrets of a new type of magic item: +5
Participates in the creation of a portal, mythal, or otherwise cooperative creation effort: +3

Reveals the secret of an item's creation to a non-member: -2
Destroys the blueprints or written knowledge of an item without permission: -4
« Last Edit: July 13, 2012, 08:04:24 PM by TravelLog »
Too much sanity may be madness and the maddest of all, to see life as it is and not as it should be.
--Miguel de Cervantes

Offline Garryl

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4508
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #37 on: July 13, 2012, 07:01:03 PM »
By the way, I just reposted the Psychosomnabulist and Whiteguard on these boards, so you should change the links in the affiliations.

Offline TravelLog

  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 371
  • Gunslinger, Descendent of Eld
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #38 on: July 13, 2012, 08:00:18 PM »
House of Black and White (relevant)

(click to show/hide)

Also, for the Delvers, I would change "Track or Endurance feats" to "Track, Endurance, or otherwise exploration-oriented feat (must not provide combat benefit)", as Track and Endurance suck.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2012, 08:04:34 PM by TravelLog »
Too much sanity may be madness and the maddest of all, to see life as it is and not as it should be.
--Miguel de Cervantes

Offline sirpercival

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 10855
  • you can't escape the miles
    • View Profile
Re: Affiliations Discussion
« Reply #39 on: July 15, 2012, 09:11:43 AM »
I really need to get back to work on these, I've just been so busy... I'll try to do some of these today.

Travellog, that link has a shipload of information in it.  What in particular was relevant?
I am the assassin of productivity

(member in good standing of the troll-feeders guild)

It's begun — my things have overgrown the previous sig.