Min/Max Boards

Meta Board => Retired PbP Games => Archive => [D&D 3.5] Nigh-Omnipotent Assholes => Topic started by: AyeGill on February 11, 2012, 05:31:03 PM

Title: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 11, 2012, 05:31:03 PM
(http://digital-art-gallery.com/oid/1/1018x768_964_The_Winds_of_Magic_2d_fantasy_warhammer_magic_battle_wizards_picture_image_digital_art.jpg)
For your out of character needs.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 11, 2012, 05:42:42 PM
Awesome pics.  :D
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 11, 2012, 05:45:17 PM
Let's see... A Tzeentch cultist/mago, pink horrors, a Jade wizard, a Metal wizard, and an high-elf Mage. Am I right ?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 11, 2012, 05:45:56 PM
I'm just trying to create a facsimile of what the campaign will deteriorate into within the first two rounds. Although perhaps this image would be better:
(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/__ZY2Vsrw3uU/S-oQAZISCgI/AAAAAAAACJw/_Qi5l3n_XFw/s320/world+explode.jpg)
Let's see... A Tzeentch cultist/mago, pink horrors, a Jade wizard, a Metal wizard, and an high-elf Mage. Am I right ?
Seems accurate.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 11, 2012, 07:10:54 PM
Lol.

Hey Aye, how do you want to treat spellbooks since we're starting above level 1?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 11, 2012, 08:53:48 PM
Are we using multiclass xp penalties?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 12, 2012, 03:47:23 AM
No multiclass XP penalties
Spellbooks: As normal? You get some spells for free by leveling up your wizard casting, any extras will have to be scribed at the cost of your infinite money.

Also, it's time for
The Unreasonable Banhammer
Where I ban things that I find will make the game less fun, and you get really mad and swear at me.

Number One: Ice Assassin. My problem with Ice Assassin is that it has no upper bounds. You can use Legend Lore to find out about the most powerful dude in the world, and create a clone of him. Don't worry, HeadofVecna, Nom can still have most of the abilities you've started him with. Which brings us to
Number Two: Your Greater Doppelganger brain. With Ice Assasin out of the way, I'm having a hard time seeing how you managed to find and beat a Greater Doppelganger. Greater Doppelgangers are, as we know, completely broken if they use Consume Identity smartly. Which these do.
Number Three: Ransom's Bracelet of Celerity. We all agreed to not turn this into celerity rocket tag. Turning the game into Celerity rocket tag is the only function of this item.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 12, 2012, 04:20:40 AM
Well that changes everything. But I have to admit it is reasonable  :banghead
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 12, 2012, 07:44:07 AM
No problem.  Are you axing celerity entirely? (Not unreasonable.)

EDIT: Also... what are the limits on Shadow Miracle?  Ransom is duplicating the effects of asking a deity for something awesome... no actual deity involved.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 12, 2012, 08:28:02 AM
Well that changes everything. But I have to admit it is reasonable  :banghead
there's still ways around that limitations, it just requires an interesting bit of workaround to do it. For instance, how fresh does the greater dopplegager brain need to be? Just pay for one, i'm pretty sure someone, somewhere, would quest to kill one and get paid.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 12, 2012, 08:29:39 AM
No problem.  Are you axing celerity entirely? (Not unreasonable.)

EDIT: Also... what are the limits on Shadow Miracle?  Ransom is duplicating the effects of asking a deity for something awesome... no actual deity involved.
doesn't seem different than making a Wish at that point, just bypassing the xp component, aren't you?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 12, 2012, 08:49:01 AM
No problem.  Are you axing celerity entirely? (Not unreasonable.)

EDIT: Also... what are the limits on Shadow Miracle?  Ransom is duplicating the effects of asking a deity for something awesome... no actual deity involved.
doesn't seem different than making a Wish at that point, just bypassing the xp component, aren't you?

Except that he has control over what happens, since he's controlling the illusion...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 12, 2012, 08:52:46 AM
No problem.  Are you axing celerity entirely? (Not unreasonable.)

EDIT: Also... what are the limits on Shadow Miracle?  Ransom is duplicating the effects of asking a deity for something awesome... no actual deity involved.
doesn't seem different than making a Wish at that point, just bypassing the xp component, aren't you?

Except that he has control over what happens, since he's controlling the illusion...
My point was that it's still limited by the bounds of the spell, CL shenanigans don't allow him to really do anything he already couldn't. Doesn't seem at different than a wish once you remove the limitations of certain things costing xp.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 12, 2012, 06:42:01 PM
Well that changes everything. But I have to admit it is reasonable  :banghead
there's still ways around that limitations, it just requires an interesting bit of workaround to do it. For instance, how fresh does the greater dopplegager brain need to be? Just pay for one, i'm pretty sure someone, somewhere, would quest to kill one and get paid.
Well it may be a matter of power level rather than access. If its just access, Nom could probably take out an ethereal doppelganger then trade with a greater doppelganger. The brain of a Body out  of Body clone for access to the greater's abilities would be win-win for everyone (well everyone but the clone).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 12, 2012, 06:53:17 PM
My point was that it's still limited by the bounds of the spell, CL shenanigans don't allow him to really do anything he already couldn't. Doesn't seem at different than a wish once you remove the limitations of certain things costing xp.

This is how I / anyone I've ever played with IRL treats Miracle anyway. Just that anything like granting the inherent bonus would normally cost the XP, which you don't have to worry about. The secondary validation for this is the fact that any magic item that requires Wish as a prerequisite also offers Miracle as an alternative, again with the archetypal example being the inherent bonuses.

This is going to be another thing that requires DM interpretation though.

Well it may be a matter of power level rather than access. If its just access, Nom could probably take out an ethereal doppelganger then trade with a greater doppelganger. The brain of a Body out  of Body clone for access to the greater's abilities would be win-win for everyone (well everyone but the clone).

+1 to eating clones. Also, if need be there is also the Burrow Root in MM5, which has the best worded split quality I know of.


Also, assumptions I'm working off of with enforced transparency from Magic Mantle means...
A) Manifester Level = Caster Level. The main occurrence of this being having half my manifesting class levels being applied to Ur-Priest.
B) That I could RoS Dispel Psionics.

Assumptions I'm going off of in general...
A) It is possible to "counter-manifest" at all. XPH is silent on this issue.
B) I can use Dispel Psionics to counterspell spells or powers in the same way as Dispel Magic could.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 13, 2012, 02:46:21 AM
Well that changes everything. But I have to admit it is reasonable  :banghead
there's still ways around that limitations, it just requires an interesting bit of workaround to do it. For instance, how fresh does the greater dopplegager brain need to be? Just pay for one, i'm pretty sure someone, somewhere, would quest to kill one and get paid.
Well it may be a matter of power level rather than access. If its just access, Nom could probably take out an ethereal doppelganger then trade with a greater doppelganger. The brain of a Body out  of Body clone for access to the greater's abilities would be win-win for everyone (well everyone but the clone).
The Greater Doppelgangers in this world are pretty happy about their monopoly on the utter gamebreaking that is Consume Identity. It's not impossible that one would trade with you, but generally they're probably loath to do so.

Don't sweat it, though. Tracking down a Greater Doppelganger to eat is a great quest hook.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 13, 2012, 04:17:39 AM
Well eating one after game start wouldn't help, since Nom's Acquire Special Quality abilities will already be set. But so long as Ethereal Doppelganger is OK, I guess I could keep the slot open that way. Also is Phaerimm out? How about class abilities set at lvl 20 (or failing that 16)? Dweomerkeeper would sub in for Phaerimm pretty well. And I had forgotten that the Legacy Champion could have also been a caster. The wording on Acquire Class Feature with regard to casters arguably allows for a feature+casting.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 13, 2012, 06:52:39 AM
Well eating one after game start wouldn't help, since Nom's Acquire Special Quality abilities will already be set. But so long as Ethereal Doppelganger is OK, I guess I could keep the slot open that way. Also is Phaerimm out? How about class abilities set at lvl 20 (or failing that 16)? Dweomerkeeper would sub in for Phaerimm pretty well. And I had forgotten that the Legacy Champion could have also been a caster. The wording on Acquire Class Feature with regard to casters arguably allows for a feature+casting.

Phaerimm is in.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 13, 2012, 08:08:41 AM
Currently cleaning up the character, and adding the equipment.
I've swapped the 3 wizard levels for factotum, to get some weapon profiency (a Kodiak not proficient with a sword or an axe ? Non-sense !), more skills, some Intelligence synergy, and a large boost to initiative, as well to give some "martial" aspect to the character. Cheese is good, but it is better with some nice, flavorful wine. ;)
the portrait is going on.
(click to show/hide)
the man next to her is giving the scale, he is 1,75 meter tall. She will be armoured : a nice mithral breastplate like this
(click to show/hide)
It is for background purpose : among the kodiak, a metal armor is a sign of wealth, power and fame.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 09:08:42 AM
(click to show/hide)


(click to show/hide)

So, Ayegill, any ruling on these things? Can Sir Percival use Miracle as though it were Wish (albeit with the spell emulation switched as per the description)? Are my assumptions about the rules correct?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 13, 2012, 10:25:11 AM
Looking over that elder evil, I'm going to have a ton of fun with this :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 10:45:15 AM
Looking over that elder evil, I'm going to have a ton of fun with this :)

To be fair, Sarasic himself would only want to TKO the dominant pantheon from his time. But it may very well be the case that even I don't know that.

Then again, I will have good knowledge rolls and a high Int.

For those who are interested, I will be CE. Don't take that the wrong way though. I do not use either part as an excuse for idiotic / random behavior. I have high Wisdom and Intelligence scores, which precludes the behavior that so many people use this alignment as excuses for. (I've mentioned before that Evil campaigns have never gone well IRL for me. This is why. Maturity.)


EDIT:
To be fair, Sarasic himself would only want to TKO the dominant pantheon from his time.
Well, only wanted. It's in Ayegills hands now.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 13, 2012, 10:54:12 AM
I'm an  urpriest as well, I just use secrets from a dead faith to power my stuff :)

Now, the fact that I am essentially a Secret in physical form is entirely something else I'm going to enjoy :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 11:14:57 AM
@ Ayegill.
In addition to the questions above, how much of the Paragon template carries over to the host? Just what is listed under SA/SQ? Or do I get the save and skill bonuses too? Attack bonuses? AC bonus? Maxed HD rolls?
Even I doubt the +12 HP per HD or speed tripling would be RAI, but I could see the argument that the rest are all racial SQ's too.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 13, 2012, 12:29:23 PM
@ Ayegill.
In addition to the questions above, how much of the Paragon template carries over to the host? Just what is listed under SA/SQ? Or do I get the save and skill bonuses too? Attack bonuses? AC bonus? Maxed HD rolls?
Even I doubt the +12 HP per HD or speed tripling would be RAI, but I could see the argument that the rest are all racial SQ's too.
Just the stuff from SA/SQ

Shadow Miracle is basically Wish.

Your assumptions are all correct.


Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 12:34:39 PM
Nuts, really wanted the save boost.

Is it wrong that the only reason I originally included the no undead thing was so that I wouldn't try to build Deep Rot, and now I really want to?

Anyone "get" the character name?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 13, 2012, 12:52:24 PM
Nuts, really wanted the save boost.

Is it wrong that the only reason I originally included the no undead thing was so that I wouldn't try to build Deep Rot, and now I really want to?

Anyone "get" the character name?

Google translate seems to think Ceithre means four, Imman means manage, and Antinomia means antinomy. So you're saying that it will be impossible to manage the other four?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 01:11:18 PM
Google translate seems to think Ceithre means four, Imman means manage, and Antinomia means antinomy. So you're saying that it will be impossible to manage the other four?

Okay. So apparently there is now a third meaning to the name. It was unintended, but apropos.

The First
(click to show/hide)

The Second
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 13, 2012, 02:46:02 PM
Lol @ initials
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 02:53:36 PM
Hmm... since I made it so that I couldn't do Deep Rot, maybe you could McPoyo. Possibly on a demiplane made by Ransom.

Would kind of mesh with your "is a living secret" thing. Have the "computer" set to analyzing other secrets?

EDIT: @ Sir P., are the items in your char. sheet ones that have been approved by Ayegill already? If so, can Svern Usk (my arty cohort) copy the scema for them? Cause I would so pimp the Earring of Resilience. Possibly as an ornament hanging from one of my horns.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 13, 2012, 03:20:07 PM
I have no idea how I just leaded what Deep Rot was now, but i'm totally doing it now. I have 170ish years of waiting now, after all.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 13, 2012, 03:30:06 PM
Given that this world is generally populated by people who know what they're doing, I'm thinking it would make sense to institute Wish economy. Your feelings?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 03:38:58 PM
Given that this world is generally populated by people who know what they're doing, I'm thinking it would make sense to institute Wish economy. Your feelings?

A Wish Economy?

Care to explain what you mean by that?

B/c all I can think of is how realistic is it that you will be able to consistently cast a spell with an XP cost, or find someone willing to take money for casting a spell that takes part of their soul.

But once you have a genie, which quickly becomes genies, Wishes become so commonplace that they wouldn't have any real market value.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 13, 2012, 03:53:23 PM
He is refering to "The Wish Economy" developped in the Tomes series by Frank Trollman & co.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 13, 2012, 03:57:53 PM
He is refering to "The Wish Economy" developped in the Tomes series by Frank Trollman & co.

Yes.

Essentially, since goods like diamonds and gold pieces, and all magic items worth less than 5000 gp(the limit on what you can create with wish), are easily reproducible, while items worth more take actual effort to make, there's no way in hell you can buy an item worth more than 5 grand for gold, since the wizard/artificer who made the item can probably just print gold at will. So a schism is formed between the markets for items worth more and less than 5 grand, and stuff like souls and liquid pain and the like, that cannot easily be mass produced, is used as currency to buy stuff on the expensive side of that barrier.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 13, 2012, 04:23:20 PM
He is refering to "The Wish Economy" developped in the Tomes series by Frank Trollman & co.

Yes.

Essentially, since goods like diamonds and gold pieces, and all magic items worth less than 5000 gp(the limit on what you can create with wish), are easily reproducible, while items worth more take actual effort to make, there's no way in hell you can buy an item worth more than 5 grand for gold, since the wizard/artificer who made the item can probably just print gold at will. So a schism is formed between the markets for items worth more and less than 5 grand, and stuff like souls and liquid pain and the like, that cannot easily be mass produced, is used as currency to buy stuff on the expensive side of that barrier.

Please bear in mind that my tone is genuinely inquisitive here and not condescending / sardonic.

Is this relevant? We will have people who, aside from mass printing GP, can mass-produce any other mundane material. We will have two cohorts, who are item-crafters. One can make whatever, but has to worry about GP / XP, though the mundane material costs are irrelevant, and can drain the XP from the mass-producible items. The other doesn't have to worry about GP / XP, but is slightly more limited in what he can make.

So we are self-sufficient once we get together, right? So, why would it matter what means we would use to get items from others, if we can get them all from each other, setting the terms each time in between the players.

Don't get me wrong, however the NPC's want reimbursed for their wares / services is entirely up to you, and I won't object to anything you set forth as far as such for this world. I just don't see it being relevant except in rare circumstances like trying to get a Doppelganger Brain, which would be completely ad-hoc anyway.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 14, 2012, 02:53:44 AM
Granted, it's not as relevant what with your cohort's item crafting, but it still limits your ability to buy stuff that's beyond your cohorts(epic items, etc).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 14, 2012, 11:28:48 AM
Granted, it's not as relevant what with your cohort's item crafting, but it still limits your ability to buy stuff that's currently beyond your cohorts(epic items, etc).

FTFY.

And I have no problem with bartering if / when it becomes relevant.

Actually, I prefer bartering, more RP opportunity.

As a Con though, RP'ing the bartering back & forth may slow down the PbP more. This is just an assumption though, since I've never played a PbP game before.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 14, 2012, 11:45:23 AM
Granted, it's not as relevant what with your cohort's item crafting, but it still limits your ability to buy stuff that's currently beyond your cohorts(epic items, etc).

FTFY.

And I have no problem with bartering if / when it becomes relevant.

Actually, I prefer bartering, more RP opportunity.

As a Con though, RP'ing the bartering back & forth may slow down the PbP more. This is just an assumption though, since I've never played a PbP game before.

There's a few things that have set prices - gems with souls in them, for example, go for the equivalent of 100 gp times the CR of the soul squared.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 14, 2012, 11:46:19 AM
Minor quibble, it's 15k in gp value.

Also, link for those interested: http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Dungeonomicon_(DnD_Other)/Economicon

I also have zero preference whether we use it or not. I function in all games like the Wish Economy is active, and plan accordingly.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 14, 2012, 12:07:43 PM
Is trafficking in souls evil?  What creatures have souls?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 14, 2012, 12:28:18 PM
Normally, yes.

Creatures with the outsider (unless they have the native subtype), ooze, construct, plant, or unread types do not have souls.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 14, 2012, 12:29:39 PM
Is trafficking in souls evil?  What creatures have souls?

What McPoyo said, and i don't believe elementals have them either.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 14, 2012, 12:39:58 PM
Darn, missed one!

Also, there's plenty of other forms of currency than souls.

Semirelated: I'm strongly considering opening up social welfare in this game.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 14, 2012, 12:41:07 PM
What sorts of currency could a fella like Ransom (not concerned with good vs evil, as long as he achieves his goals) muster?

Also, what are your social welfare goals?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 14, 2012, 12:48:06 PM
TThe thread I linked on the last page details some of them (souls, certain rare gems, etc).

Basically, I set up a "free" clinic funded by donations to heal all illnesses. I then use that to amass crazy amounts of prestige and "good person" points, especially with the masses, and then systematically drive all the local churches out of business as far as healing goes.

Meanwhile, I drag liquid agony from those afflicted with illness while they're asleep using spell turrets, just like I provide healing the same way.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 14, 2012, 02:34:21 PM
There are other goods to sell in Wish Economy like souls : there is the equivalent of Liquid Pain in BoED, for the goodie two shoes, if I remember well.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 14, 2012, 02:43:22 PM
Which you use the Nipple Clamps of Exquisite Pleasure from the BoVD to harvest agony and bliss at the same time...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 14, 2012, 06:40:38 PM
I'm fine with the wish economy. But souls as currency doesn't quite make sense to me. Souls can be easily extracted from turnip farmers, right? It seems like most transactions would at the wish level would be barter, more dangerous than big drug deals, sometimes coordinated through epic favor traders.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 14, 2012, 07:27:38 PM
Minor quibble, it's 15k in gp value.

Also, link for those interested: http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Dungeonomicon_(DnD_Other)/Economicon

I also have zero preference whether we use it or not. I function in all games like the Wish Economy is active, and plan accordingly.

Minor quibble, it's unspecified.

In 3.0 Wish's list, it listed that you could make any mundane item of up to 25,000gp, and make any magic item or add to the properties of an existing magic item by a value of up to 15,000gp.

3.5 Wish, on the other hand...
Quote from: SRD Wish
Create a nonmagical item of up to 25,000 gp in value.
Create a magic item, or add to the powers of an existing magic item.

The value isn't given. One could suppose it to be 25,000gp because of the 1xp = 5gp thing, but it is always in the DM's hands now, because the spell doesn't say (I had one DM allow up to 50,000gp, I thought he was crazy. But he also gave us  a Deck of Many Things, so maybe he just wanted us to take things too far.)

Normally, yes.

Creatures with the outsider (unless they have the native subtype), ooze, construct, plant, or unread types do not have souls.

A) With Outsiders (and Elementals), their soul and body are specified as forming a single unit, rather than being separate. This means that they do have souls.

B) I am wondering where you came up with this list. As plant creatures can still be rezzed, as could oozes. Constructs and undead have their own version of an animating force, which is all a soul really is in D&D. So It could be argued that they have souls, just a different type of soul that isn't called a "soul" making it a semantic nomenclature argument. More to the point, Trap the Soul can affect anything, it's just that Constructs and Undead would require the version of the spell that doesn't offer a save.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 14, 2012, 07:54:09 PM
AA combination of BoVD's list of mortals, and the raise dead spell.

And souls have value because they can be used to make stuff, or literally be eaten to gain power if an outsider.

Also, 25000 gp in value means 25000 gp, so...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 14, 2012, 08:13:21 PM
AA combination of BoVD's list of mortals, and the raise dead spell.

And souls have value because they can be used to make stuff, or literally be eaten to gain power if an outsider.

Also, 25000 gp in value means 25000 gp, so...

(click to show/hide)

The problem with just stating that Wish is 25K'GP, is that those are separate bullet points on the list. While I believe that is the RAI, that's me. Ayegill is the arbiter of the rules here, so it's up to him.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 14, 2012, 08:47:28 PM
True
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 12:59:37 AM
Ransom's background (also posted with his char sheet in spoilers):

The Long Slow Road to Nowhere

"Come on, Ransom, keep up!  You're such a slowpoke!"

The boy, age 8, frowns in frustration as the older girl, with her longer legs, races around the corner.  His is a serious face, full of maturity beyond his years; currently his hair is dark and curly, and his eyes are a bright green that matches hers.

Ransom looks down at his legs and stumbles slightly as they lengthen in a matter of seconds -- he looks ridiculous, with stilt-like ankles emerging from pants that are suddenly too short.  Awkwardly, like a newborn colt, he scampers around the corner... and the girl is gone.

"Syrrah...?" he asks uncertainly.  "Where are you?"

"I'm right behind you, silly."  Syrrah's voice murmurs in his ear, making him jump.

The boy spins around, stumbling again and returning his legs to their usual length.  The dirt road behind him is empty.

Again, Syrrah speaks in his ear.  "Or maybe... I'm nowhere."

The boy turns in a circle, unable to pinpoint the source of the noise as the missing girl bursts into peals of shimmering laughter, which echo and fade
.

Syrrah was everything that Ransom idolized -- beautiful, rebellious, brilliant.  She would pull him away from his constant studies to enact illusionary battles, hunt fantastic illusionary creatures, and explore illusionary ruins.  She constructed worlds for them to rule as they wished, and all the while Ransom tagged along, learning and longing to be so full of life.

Then the goblins came, spurred to such a fury that the townspeople had never seen before.  Ransom's master left to aid in the defense, leaving Ransom hiding in his cellar bedroom behind heavy wards.  He didn't even hear her come in (as usual), but when the window crashed and Syrrah screamed, he steeled his resolve and snuck upstairs.

The barghest left barely a scrap of her to bury.

Years later, Ransom is sober and reserved, his face (when he chooses) lined with unusual maturity.  He keeps a locket with Syrrah's picture, and he often looks at her for guidance before attempting anything dangerous or stupid... he hears "You're such a slowpoke!" and smiles.

The seed of illusion planted by Syrrah in his mind has sprouted into full-blown mastery.  He has learned to work with shadows, and by relying on his superior knowledge of the Weave, he can best nearly any other wizard in a duel, with unparalleled versatility and strength.  However, his achievements leave him hollow.

One evening, Ransom has a brilliant idea, so crazy and reckless that he is convinced it came from his idol.  "You were right, Syrrah," he murmurs into the hot and heavy summer darkness.  "You're 'nowhere'... but soon you'll be somewhere."

For this plan, he needs a special demesne of his own, hidden away from prying eyes.  After a year of searching, he realizes that the place he wants doesn't exist, and resolves to make one for himself.  It's simple, but requires immense strength in the arcane arts, beyond what even he should be able to do.  He draws Shadow into the Ethereal plane, shapes it according to his will, and with an exhausting burst of magic, he is Nowhere.

Ransom seems to float in midair, surrounded by... nothing.  He smiles, walking across invisible ground, his magically-enhanced senses piercing the natural veil to see the shape of the land, taken shape in his mind.  He crafts more Shadow, creating seeds, and plants them, saving a particularly fertile acorn for the very center, the Middle of Nowhere.  As the invisible plants grow at his bidding, he walks the edge of his domain, expanding it outward.  Finally, he is satisfied.

The next part of his plan is so bold as to be outrageous.  Ransom has no idea if it will work, but he has always been convincing, and he believes with a fire that burns inside him, damning the rest of the world to watch while he works miracles.  He travels the Planes, finally discovering what he seeks among a race of ancient giants: a tribe of naturally invisible creatures.

Ransom dubs these agrarian folk the Nihil, and he brings them to a land just as veiled as they, where they settle in immediately -- the ground is fertile and ripe for farming, the stone beneath rich in minerals.  With Ransom's help, they begin to multiply and colonize Nowhere, planting crops and trees, and digging below the surface.

When the Nihil ask Ransom about Nowhere, how it came to be, he speaks to them of the Goddess Who Is Not.  This place is her home, though she doesn't yet know it, and the giant oak tree in the Middle is sacred to her.

At first the Nihil are baffled -- their benefactor worships a Goddess who is no Goddess? He explains that she will be: if he and the Nihil work to make this place perfect, she will have no choice but to come and reside there.

The Nihil are overcome with awe.  They have been chosen by Ransom, the Prophet Who Is Not, to prepare the way for the Goddess.  They begin to worship her, though they expect no answer, for the way is not yet ready.  When it is, the Goddess Who Is Not will come to Nowhere, where some roads lead, and she will meet the Nihil, the people of Nothing.  And she will find her home.

Meanwhile, Ransom travels the Planes, looking for any sign that his friend has returned.  He stays in close contact with the Nihil, keeping track of the progress they are making.  He cares nothing for the laws of man or god, for he is filled and sustained by this burning Idea.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 15, 2012, 02:05:25 AM
Wish is 25k. It seems that's the way it's intended to be read.

Also, most transactions are probably barter, but you have to realize that a commoner 1 has a CR of ½ or something like that. That's 25 gp. You'd have to cast trap the soul thousands of times to even buy small unwishable items, and at that point, it's really not different from having a gold mine in pre-wish economy, is it?

Also, that background is awesome.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 15, 2012, 07:22:31 AM
Niiiiice.

I really, reallyneed to find a goal for my character as powerful and full of hooks as yours, gentlemen.

It's me though, or we have all already our demiplane ?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 15, 2012, 08:04:53 AM
I don't officially have a demiplae, yet. I'm still trying to decide if I should make one, or if I should just bury mine deep within the earth and ward it to hell and back.

Edit:Also, was someone doing something with swiftblade?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 08:10:16 AM
So here's the next question: Will Ransom be at odds with Arias's Elder Evil?  I don't think so -- especially if there's only a certain amount of divinity to go around, he'll probably be like "fuck the current gods, I want MY gods".

Also, as I said I have no idea if his plan will work (and neither does he).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 15, 2012, 11:13:05 AM
So here's the next question: Will Ransom be at odds with Arias's Elder Evil?  I don't think so -- especially if there's only a certain amount of divinity to go around, he'll probably be like "fuck the current gods, I want MY gods".

Also, as I said I have no idea if his plan will work (and neither does he).

@ Sir P.
(click to show/hide)

@ Ayegill
~ Are we allowed affiliations?
~ PHB p139 stated that the DM can / does put restrictions on what can be done as a free action, how many times per turn can a free action magic item be activated, such as the Gloves of Storing?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 15, 2012, 12:31:48 PM
No affiliations, and what do you have in mind with Gloves of Storing, if anything specific? I'm not sure about free actions, to be honest, as long as you're not doing something that goes above and beyond what is normally considered ridiculous(what we are doing), it should be fine.

Also, I think between all your backgrounds, we have enough hooks for a decent sandbox game. So that just means we need to contrive a reason for you to meet up and work together. Any ideas? Otherwise we'll just go with "guy hired you all for fetchquest/dungeon crawl", which is a tad weak.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 12:39:16 PM
Question -- how much work should I put into designing Nowhere and the Nihil?  If we're not going to spend much time there, it won't be worth it, but if it'll be important to the story then I'd be happy to put some time into it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 15, 2012, 12:41:15 PM
Question -- how much work should I put into designing Nowhere and the Nihil?  If we're not going to spend much time there, it won't be worth it, but if it'll be important to the story then I'd be happy to put some time into it.

As long as you have a general idea of how Nowhere looks, and you can show me some sort of templated mess that is the Nihil, we're good.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 15, 2012, 01:00:18 PM
...and what do you have in mind with Gloves of Storing, if anything specific? I'm not sure about free actions, to be honest, as long as you're not doing something that goes above and beyond what is normally considered ridiculous(what we are doing), it should be fine.

The most "broken" thing I can think of with Gloves of Storing would be storing plates with Symbol spells on them, then "flicking" them in and out to proc about 5 saves / turn if the limit were 10. As a free action. Best would be Charm and Weakness. I used this in a less powerful game once, with the limit of 6 activation of the gloves each round (one each second, as the DM ruled the command word would take 1 second), resulting in three Fort saves (I think the DC was ~36) or take 3d6 Str damage (per failure), or make three Will saves or be my friend.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
No affiliations...
Also, I think between all your backgrounds, we have enough hooks for a decent sandbox game.

Umm... my background isn't up yet, but the shorthand would be 1/3 Alia Atreides, 1/3 Rico from Judge Dread and 1/3 Zygmunt Molotch. Now that I know there is no affiliations, I can finish my b/g and have it up sometime tomorrow morning.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
So that just means we need to contrive a reason for you to meet up and work together. Any ideas? Otherwise we'll just go with "guy hired you all for fetchquest/dungeon crawl", which is a tad weak.

(click to show/hide)

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
As long as you have a general idea of how Nowhere looks,


Ummmmmmm...... I know how it looks.  :D
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 15, 2012, 01:06:00 PM

As long as you have a general idea of how Nowhere looks,


Ummmmmmm...... I know how it looks.  :D

With true seeing on  :P
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 15, 2012, 01:18:23 PM
Also, one other point about the Wish Economy.

(click to show/hide)

Also, speaking of stuff, I will be submitting 1-3 items for your approval after I finish by b/g, and a few staffs as well.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 15, 2012, 01:36:07 PM
As far a commonalities, none of us particularly enjoy the gods. We have one guy who wants to build his own, one guy who wants to kill them all, and one who wants to eventually become one (me), I have no idea about the other two players, so far.

And speaking of Vecna, I doubt he'd have an issue helping to kill the other gods as a power play for himself. He's been everything from a mortal, to nearly an Overgod, and back again more than once in his history, and has either survived or self-resurrected himself after his deific death at least three times i know of.

Arias, is what you've posted all that you have done regarding that elder evil? I'm having a hard time reconciling my character worshipping anything but an elder evil at this point, and may be jumping on your bandwagon.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 15, 2012, 01:49:06 PM
Arias, is what you've posted all that you have done regarding that elder evil? I'm having a hard time reconciling my character worshipping anything but an elder evil at this point, and may be jumping on your bandwagon.

I did basically everything BUT stat him / his signs, etc.
I've referenced other parts of his ideals here, but I am refraining from revealing everything just because I'm unsure of how much will be character knowledge. That is up to Ayegill. Though to be fair, I have a starting Int of 36, will have several ranks in each knowledge, and my "Zygmunt Molotch" comes form his Cogitae training, which my "Cogitae" was the cult. You'll understand when I post it, but the point is, I doubt the C.I.A. will lack for the knowledge about Sarasic.

If Ayegill doesn't mind, I'll repost what I sent him here.

P.S. Yes, come to the dark side.

P.P.S. We have CAKE!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 15, 2012, 01:52:06 PM
Reason i'm asking is that I have a serious problem trying to even see how my character falls on the "become undead or not" scale, purely because drow live a damned long time to begin with, and there's plenty of magic to make that "damned long time" into 'eternity" to begin with.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 01:57:18 PM
Arias, is what you've posted all that you have done regarding that elder evil? I'm having a hard time reconciling my character worshipping anything but an elder evil at this point, and may be jumping on your bandwagon.

I did basically everything BUT stat him / his signs, etc.
I've referenced other parts of his ideals here, but I am refraining from revealing everything just because I'm unsure of how much will be character knowledge. That is up to Ayegill. Though to be fair, I have a starting Int of 36, will have several ranks in each knowledge, and my "Zygmunt Molotch" comes form his Cogitae training, which my "Cogitae" was the cult. You'll understand when I post it, but the point is, I doubt the C.I.A. will lack for the knowledge about Sarasic.

If Ayegill doesn't mind, I'll repost what I sent him here.

P.S. Yes, come to the dark side.

P.P.S. We have CAKE!

Invisible cake!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 15, 2012, 02:04:54 PM
Unrelated to anything else: I just want to say, illithid underboob is slightly more disturbing than 4e dragonborn having boobs. But only slightly.

Granted, I also just laughed my ass off between the underboob and the "open bar" sign with all the skulls.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 15, 2012, 02:10:55 PM
(click to show/hide)
Invisible cake!

I knew someone would say that.  :P

Reason i'm asking is that I have a serious problem trying to even see how my character falls on the "become undead or not" scale, purely because drow live a damned long time to begin with, and there's plenty of magic to make that "damned long time" into 'eternity" to begin with.

Well, I designed Sarasic a long time ago as a DM, and I didn't want the cult to try to use Deep Rot to help them think, so I added in a clause wherein he doesn't like undead (yet another god fucking with him, that time Nerull). And I kept that on him when submitted to Aye. So you wouldn't follow mine and be undead.

More to the point though, why would you want to be undead.
(click to show/hide)

EDIT:
Unrelated to anything else: I just want to say, illithid underboob is slightly more disturbing than 4e dragonborn having boobs. But only slightly.

Granted, I also just laughed my ass off between the underboob and the "open bar" sign with all the skulls.
I love that poster. My sanity left long ago.
EDIT: EDIT: OH! I didn't realize you'd used the picture as yours.  :lmao
I need to find a better "half-minotaur mongrelfolk" with a Kuato halfling. but the Tauren works for now.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 15, 2012, 02:19:51 PM


If Ayegill doesn't mind, I'll repost what I sent him here.

I don't mind, as I assume you would know that(especially seeing as how you're a member of his cult).

Also, about astral projection: good point. Let's say various powerful entities have an interest in the economy remaining functional(because they're at the top of it), so if you try to use Astral Projection or the like to make infinite items, they make sure you won't be doing that any more.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 15, 2012, 02:31:38 PM
Sarasic
Elder Evil Profile
Background
(click to show/hide)
He was once a Half-Dragon Lizardfolk Archivist, tasked with the protection of his village from any form of arcane threat. He failed.
Worshipers of Erythnul on a slaughter-binge decided that no one would miss the settlement of lizardfolk. They charged through killing everyone and everything in the village. Sarasic survived only by means of a Death Pact that had been placed on him.

After the loss of his village, he tried to pray to various gods, including Bahamut and Heironeous, for retribution against Erythnul and his followers, but his prayers went unanswered. When a cult dedicated to Nerull came to the area where Sarasics village once was, and began using the bodies and spirits, Sarasic realized that the “good” gods were never going to help, but that the evil gods were going to continue to sow mayhem. He decided that if the gods who were supposed to help people would not then that meant that the entire pantheon needed to be “refreshed”. This would entail the deicide of all of the major members of the current pantheons.

Sarasic realized that to take on the gods was a monumental task, not to be taken lightly, and set about methods to plan their destruction. As he set himself on his path, he also took note of events wherein the gods committed or allowed other atrosities, and eventually came to believe that it was his destiny to destroy them.

After many years of study into how to accomplish his twisted revenge, he came upon the information of the progenitor races. Using their abilities to alter himself to near-deity hood himself was his goal. Unfortunately, the gods learned of his plans, as Sarasic could not hide his knowledge and secrets from those that govern such things. Sarasic had already managed to make himself powerful enough to resist the gods attempt to destroy him by the time they acted, however the gods of magic collaborated to make a prison for Sarasic, inside of which time would stop entirely*.

* basically, the Amber Sarcophagus spell on crack.

Goals
(click to show/hide)

Dogma
-Seek to free him (duh).
-Seek to subvert the gods (duh).
-Do not tolerate the undead, as they are the tools of the gods (his village was used by a Nerull cult).
-Seek out information, as Knowledge is the gods greatest weapon. Do not hesitate to share this information with other mortals, as This degrades the gods advantage. Do not share knowledge with those that will only use it to serve the gods, as that only empowers the enemy, instead use deception against the enemy wherever possible.


Do you want me to do any more? Do you want to decide the knowledge DC's or me? Stat block? Etc.

so if you try to use Astral Projection or the like to make infinite items

"make infinite"

Is it okay if I use the method to have 1-2 extra copies of my stuff though? Especially my scepters, wands & staffs?

Other than having a "backup stash" so I'm not completely  AFU by a Mordies DJ, it would also expedite helping one another gear up. At least for things we are mutually interested in.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 15, 2012, 02:49:44 PM
Sarasic
Elder Evil Profile
Background
(click to show/hide)
He was once a Half-Dragon Lizardfolk Archivist, tasked with the protection of his village from any form of arcane threat. He failed.
Worshipers of Erythnul on a slaughter-binge decided that no one would miss the settlement of lizardfolk. They charged through killing everyone and everything in the village. Sarasic survived only by means of a Death Pact that had been placed on him.

After the loss of his village, he tried to pray to various gods, including Bahamut and Heironeous, for retribution against Erythnul and his followers, but his prayers went unanswered. When a cult dedicated to Nerull came to the area where Sarasics village once was, and began using the bodies and spirits, Sarasic realized that the “good” gods were never going to help, but that the evil gods were going to continue to sow mayhem. He decided that if the gods who were supposed to help people would not then that meant that the entire pantheon needed to be “refreshed”. This would entail the deicide of all of the major members of the current pantheons.

Sarasic realized that to take on the gods was a monumental task, not to be taken lightly, and set about methods to plan their destruction. As he set himself on his path, he also took note of events wherein the gods committed or allowed other atrosities, and eventually came to believe that it was his destiny to destroy them.

After many years of study into how to accomplish his twisted revenge, he came upon the information of the progenitor races. Using their abilities to alter himself to near-deity hood himself was his goal. Unfortunately, the gods learned of his plans, as Sarasic could not hide his knowledge and secrets from those that govern such things. Sarasic had already managed to make himself powerful enough to resist the gods attempt to destroy him by the time they acted, however the gods of magic collaborated to make a prison for Sarasic, inside of which time would stop entirely*.

* basically, the Amber Sarcophagus spell on crack.

Goals
(click to show/hide)

Dogma
-Seek to free him (duh).
-Seek to subvert the gods (duh).
-Do not tolerate the undead, as they are the tools of the gods (his village was used by a Nerull cult).
-Seek out information, as Knowledge is the gods greatest weapon. Do not hesitate to share this information with other mortals, as This degrades the gods advantage. Do not share knowledge with those that will only use it to serve the gods, as that only empowers the enemy, instead use deception against the enemy wherever possible.


Do you want me to do any more? Do you want to decide the knowledge DC's or me? Stat block? Etc.

so if you try to use Astral Projection or the like to make infinite items

"make infinite"

Is it okay if I use the method to have 1-2 extra copies of my stuff though? Especially my scepters, wands & staffs?

Other than having a "backup stash" so I'm not completely  AFU by a Mordies DJ, it would also expedite helping one another gear up. At least for things we are mutually interested in.

Probably. Dealing with absolutely everybody who uses Astral Projection ever is probably overextending yourself, no matter how powerful you are, so you can probably get away with a backup stash or two.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 03:10:08 PM
Aye, is there any way I can upgrade the Primordial Giant Invisibility to Greater Invisibility?  I could drop something else... also, they need to be able to see the landscape, so they need see invisibility as well.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 15, 2012, 03:13:34 PM
Aye, is there any way I can upgrade the Primordial Giant Invisibility to Greater Invisibility?  I could drop something else... also, they need to be able to see the landscape, so they need see invisibility as well.

As a suggestion, Wish?

And another several Wishes to make it Superior Invisibility, which is Darkstalker + HiPS on crack.

Seriously, Superior Invisibility.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 03:29:55 PM
I was thinking that Shadow-Miracled Permanency followed by a Shadow Miracle to make it innate could work on the See Invisibility (with Aye's approval).  I would have to do a number of them so that the original tribe all had the effect, and then hope that they passed it on to their progeny.

Thoughts?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 15, 2012, 03:36:52 PM
I was thinking that Shadow-Miracled Permanency followed by a Shadow Miracle to make it innate could work on the See Invisibility (with Aye's approval).  I would have to do a number of them so that the original tribe all had the effect, and then hope that they passed it on to their progeny.

Thoughts?

Totally doable. Don't know 'bout Greater Invisibility, though. Suppose I'll allow it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 15, 2012, 03:45:01 PM
Unrelated to anything else: I just want to say, illithid underboob is slightly more disturbing than 4e dragonborn having boobs. But only slightly.

Granted, I also just laughed my ass off between the underboob and the "open bar" sign with all the skulls.
:D As soon as I saw it I knew I had to use that pic. I think it captures the feel of my character nicely, disturbing yet playful, a huge turn off and a little bit of a turn on at the same time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 06:55:29 PM
I was thinking that Shadow-Miracled Permanency followed by a Shadow Miracle to make it innate could work on the See Invisibility (with Aye's approval).  I would have to do a number of them so that the original tribe all had the effect, and then hope that they passed it on to their progeny.

Thoughts?

Totally doable. Don't know 'bout Greater Invisibility, though. Suppose I'll allow it.

Another Shadow Miracle to change it to Greater?

OK, so then I'll post up the Nihil shortly.  Do you want the info on Nowhere and the Nihil in this thread, the char sheet thread, the World Info thread, or a thread devoted entirely to our various strongholds?  :)

More questions.  Genesis adds 180' of radius each time it's cast... since I'm making the castings Invisible, that means I can cast Genesis out of 6th, 7th, and 8th-level slots.  How big should I have the plane be?  It can be pretty enormous, I think... in terms of height and depth, do I have a cylinder or a sphere?

EDIT: Actually, it'll be 360' of radius, since I can Widen it for free thanks to Arcane Thesis.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 15, 2012, 08:16:18 PM
Number of spell slots is irrelevant, since you have to wait for the duration to finish before it'll have any meaningful effect, so as long as you can do it 1/year, you're good.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 08:23:19 PM
Actually, the 1-week lead-up time is RAW only from the original casting.  After that it adds on as soon as you're done casting (which would normally be a week, but for Ransom is a standard action).

Quote from: SRD
Once the basic demiplane reaches its maximum size, the spellcaster can continue to cast this spell to enlarge the demiplane, adding another 180 feet of radius to the demiplane each time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 15, 2012, 10:06:21 PM
Actually, the 1-week lead-up time is RAW only from the original casting.  After that it adds on as soon as you're done casting (which would normally be a week, but for Ransom is a standard action).

Quote from: SRD
Once the basic demiplane reaches its maximum size, the spellcaster can continue to cast this spell to enlarge the demiplane, adding another 180 feet of radius to the demiplane each time.
The "reaches its maximum size" line is what limits it, timewise.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 15, 2012, 10:32:59 PM
Well, I have two issues with that: first is "basic demiplane" to me is talking about the original casting, not any subsequents.  Secondary to that is: how long does it take for the expansions to happen?  It doesn't say that either.

EDIT: Even if it takes as long as the original with every expansion, that's only a week.  There are a lot more weeks than 1/year.

You know, maybe he should just do it once a week.  He has other stuff to cast there anyway -- TC for seeds, plant growth, etc.  I dunno... it doesn't really matter how big it is, I guess. Whenever he stops by, if it isn't currently expanding and he has an extra slot, he'll fire one off.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 15, 2012, 11:29:48 PM
Well, I have two issues with that: first is "basic demiplane" to me is talking about the original casting, not any subsequents.  Secondary to that is: how long does it take for the expansions to happen?  It doesn't say that either.

EDIT: Even if it takes as long as the original with every expansion, that's only a week.  There are a lot more weeks than 1/year.

You know, maybe he should just do it once a week.  He has other stuff to cast there anyway -- TC for seeds, plant growth, etc.  I dunno... it doesn't really matter how big it is, I guess. Whenever he stops by, if it isn't currently expanding and he has an extra slot, he'll fire one off.
It actually does say how long the expansions take, though I had it twice as long. Second paragraph, "At first, the fledgling plane grows at a rate of 1 foot in radius per day to an initial maximum radius of 180 feet as it rapidly draws substance from surrounding ethereal vapors and protomatter. "

Taking the entire spell into account, it's pretty clear that you have to wait until it hits maximum size before increasing it's size with another casting.

"initial maximum radius of 180 feet"
and
"reaches its maximum size"
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 16, 2012, 01:40:28 AM
I was thinking that Shadow-Miracled Permanency followed by a Shadow Miracle to make it innate could work on the See Invisibility (with Aye's approval).  I would have to do a number of them so that the original tribe all had the effect, and then hope that they passed it on to their progeny.

Thoughts?

Totally doable. Don't know 'bout Greater Invisibility, though. Suppose I'll allow it.

Another Shadow Miracle to change it to Greater?

OK, so then I'll post up the Nihil shortly.  Do you want the info on Nowhere and the Nihil in this thread, the char sheet thread, the World Info thread, or a thread devoted entirely to our various strongholds?  :)

More questions.  Genesis adds 180' of radius each time it's cast... since I'm making the castings Invisible, that means I can cast Genesis out of 6th, 7th, and 8th-level slots.  How big should I have the plane be?  It can be pretty enormous, I think... in terms of height and depth, do I have a cylinder or a sphere?

EDIT: Actually, it'll be 360' of radius, since I can Widen it for free thanks to Arcane Thesis.

I'm thinking put it in the World topic.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 16, 2012, 10:17:19 AM
Is there an LA +0 Half-minotaur template?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 16, 2012, 10:26:11 AM
Well, I have two issues with that: first is "basic demiplane" to me is talking about the original casting, not any subsequents.  Secondary to that is: how long does it take for the expansions to happen?  It doesn't say that either.

EDIT: Even if it takes as long as the original with every expansion, that's only a week.  There are a lot more weeks than 1/year.

You know, maybe he should just do it once a week.  He has other stuff to cast there anyway -- TC for seeds, plant growth, etc.  I dunno... it doesn't really matter how big it is, I guess. Whenever he stops by, if it isn't currently expanding and he has an extra slot, he'll fire one off.
It actually does say how long the expansions take, though I had it twice as long. Second paragraph, "At first, the fledgling plane grows at a rate of 1 foot in radius per day to an initial maximum radius of 180 feet as it rapidly draws substance from surrounding ethereal vapors and protomatter. "

Taking the entire spell into account, it's pretty clear that you have to wait until it hits maximum size before increasing it's size with another casting.

"initial maximum radius of 180 feet"
and
"reaches its maximum size"

But if it always grows at the same rate, why include "At first"?  That implies that the growth rate changes at some point.  The only changeover that's actually talked about is switching from initial casting to future castings.

BTW, if you're right, it'll still be a year because he Widens it to 360 feet each casting.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 16, 2012, 10:30:22 AM
If widen is applicable, it would widen by 2 feet per day, not 1.

And I'm probably guessing it's written from the perspective of first time casting ever, much like ToB's "chooses a first level stance" clause is written from the perspective of taking the class at first, not multiclassing into it.

Either way, it doesn't have any language to indicate that the expansion rate ever changes.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 16, 2012, 10:43:19 AM
Oh, right -- 180 days then, so twice per year.

Honestly... let's just go with the slow ruling.  As I said, he has other stuff he needs to cast on it, and if he makes it too big he'll never catch up.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 16, 2012, 07:31:15 PM
Is there any way to get a true dragon as a teammate in a way that doesn't limit its hit dice (like Leadership, Thrallherd, etc. do)?

Because once we hit 18th level and Ransom gets 9th-level spells, we can get a wyrmling dragon in such a method, and he can Shapechange into a Phane, and put the dragon into temporal stasis, then age it 1d4 years every round.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 16, 2012, 08:00:59 PM
Domination or Diplomacy to Fanaticism.

Also, temporal stasis is unnecessary: just drop a curse on it. Ages one category per curse, easily done.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 16, 2012, 09:06:52 PM
If Bestow Curse stacks, which it may not.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 17, 2012, 07:05:22 AM
How about someone got a Draconic Familiar, treat him nicely, get a new dragon once the familiar is too old, diplomance the old familiar to be fanatical toward us, age him, and repeat ?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 17, 2012, 08:26:36 AM
Like i said in the original thread, we won't be using vanilla diplomacy.

How do you all like this (http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9606632&postcount=2) variant?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 17, 2012, 08:36:22 AM
I'm using it in Magipunk... it's still kinda DM fiat-y, but at least the terms are more clearly defined and have more gradations (and the whole Fanatic thing isn't).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 17, 2012, 11:58:41 AM
I've used it a couple times in games, and it works pretty well. Keeps things more ",realistic within the game world" as far as mechanics go.

Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 17, 2012, 12:03:31 PM
What we need to do is find a lawful dragon and have it sign a contract: we'll age it a bunch of categories, and in payment it'll help us rock out on our enemies.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 17, 2012, 02:02:27 PM
What we need to do is find a lawful dragon and have it sign a contract: we'll age it a bunch of categories, and in payment it'll help us rock out on our enemies.

Bio up. Caution: Wall of Text.

(click to show/hide)

I like the Diplo, you don't make people like you more with it, just barter a better deal at the time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 17, 2012, 04:17:18 PM
[Bio]

This. This right here.

This is how you Bio.

So you're the leader of Sasaric's cult? Interesting.

There's so very many plot possibilities here.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 17, 2012, 06:06:06 PM
Meh... are you calling my bio inadequate?? ;)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 17, 2012, 08:27:57 PM
Can I use reserves of strength to break the hit die limit for making zombies with animate dead? To clarify, I mean the "can't have more than 10 hit die" clause.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 17, 2012, 10:48:58 PM
This. This right here.
This is how you Bio.

TYVM

So you're the leader of Sasaric's cult? Interesting.
There's so very many plot possibilities here.

The cult is my leadership feat. My cohort is his "brother" and the followers are the rest of the members. Most don't know about the EE though, since they are low-level peoples of little relevance.
If we had affiliations it would have been a knowledge church with connections to the Paraagnostic Assembly.

Meh... are you calling my bio inadequate?? ;)

I don't think anyone's Bio is inadequate.
Aarda is deep, involved, and intricate.
Ransom shows he is a desperate romantic, he wants his childhood friend back, the person who taught him how to live.
Nom is short and funny. And quite apropos.

But yeah, I am a firm believer that a persons Character Sheet is a story that needs told, there is nothing there that doesn't have mean something to the person. And once you start that tale, the person should write themselves.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 18, 2012, 03:46:07 AM
Oh mine is inadequate, or at least far from finished. There's a century or two of history to cover.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 18, 2012, 11:46:43 AM
Re-posting unanswered questions.

@ Ayegill, what is the free action limit on free action command word items like Gloves of Storing and it's derivatives?

(click to show/hide)

@ Sir P., are the items in your char. sheet ones that have been approved by Ayegill already? If so, can Svern Usk (my arty cohort) copy the scema for them? Cause I would so pimp the Earring of Resilience. Possibly as an ornament hanging from one of my horns.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 18, 2012, 12:02:18 PM
Re-posting unanswered questions.

@ Ayegill, what is the free action limit on free action command word items like Gloves of Storing and it's derivatives?

(click to show/hide)

Lets say 10 per round.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 18, 2012, 02:26:24 PM
Absolutely, in fact he'll probably be the one making them for me.  ;)

EDIT: And to be clear, they've all been approved.

The only thing I have left to do is nail down exactly what my symbiote can do.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 18, 2012, 04:03:05 PM
Arias, how did you get your stat table to format so nicely?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 18, 2012, 06:00:22 PM
Arias, how did you get your stat table to format so nicely?
He made a table, button 1 left of the Number sign in the formatting options.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 18, 2012, 07:10:46 PM
Arias, how did you get your stat table to format so nicely?
He made a table, button 1 left of the Number sign in the formatting options.

Hey, I didn't notice that button, cool.

I used
Bracket Table2=1 Bracket
Bracket Row Bracket  Bracket Cell Bracket Bracket /row Bracket
Bracket Row2 Bracket  Bracket Cell Bracket Bracket /row2 Bracket
Bracket /Table Bracket

If you ever want to know how someone formatted something, Quote them. It opens a post that will show exactly what they did.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 18, 2012, 10:28:17 PM
Excellent, thanks. Its interesting that the code is rather different than that for more simple layout.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 19, 2012, 04:58:46 AM
I've almost finished to get my items for both characters. I do have a stupid question, though :
it's the first time I use leadership or see it used for real - usually banished everywhere I played, so what kind of wealth does have the cohort ? NPC wealth ? WBL for an ECL 14 character ? shared WBL with the main character ?
I've used the latter for the moment.

Now, the funny things.
I have a leftover of around 30k and a further 200k budget from Landlord... How about we build our nice little place ? 200k is a tad short for a flying tower, but I do think we can have a small teleporting one with this.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 19, 2012, 05:02:29 AM
Think it's standard NPC wealth. Not sure, though.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 07:18:24 AM
I've seen standard npc as well as standard pc. I don't know that it really matters too terribly much, because of infinite wealth after game start. Make whichever call you feel best with, Aye.

Edit:so also, why not have the stronghold be a gateway? It leads to a pocket dimension group stronghold with gates to our private demiplanes, and the "stronghold the outside world see" is basically oohing more than a Tardis used to access it? That's a hell of a lot cheaper to have move about, if it's the size of a cottage.

Also, Sarasic's thoughts towards unread created by an urpriest that stole the power from the gods? Seems like it could stand as an exception. I ask this not for worship reasons, but for party cohesion reasons.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 19, 2012, 08:18:55 AM
i'll use standard npc. That's already mean I'll have more money to spend on a nice forteress !

I like the idea of the gateway forteress, that was already what I was planning to do.
Though, what I don't know yet, is what to do on my own demiplane. recreate the Whallala is fun, but I find it a bit cliche. A huge library and knowledge museum ? The perfect hunting ground for Kodiaks ? A huge battleground for other Kodiaks to challenge their mettle ?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 08:46:11 AM
AyeGill, two questions:

1) Can you WRT yourself?
2) Is there any way to protect a piece of information from being divined/bardic knowledge'd/omnifiscer'd? For example, say two people know it, and both have permanent mind blank.  Would that do it?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 19, 2012, 09:16:25 AM
AyeGill, two questions:

1) Can you WRT yourself?
2) Is there any way to protect a piece of information from being divined/bardic knowledge'd/omnifiscer'd? For example, say two people know it, and both have permanent mind blank.  Would that do it?

1): No.

2): There's no end-all way to protect any given information from being known, AFAIK. Mind blank on the people who know it would work, I'd say, for Bardic Knowledge and omnifiscer, but divination spells can still find out by just reading the info directly(for example, if you ask "where does the lich keep his phylactery", even if only he knows, and he has mind blank, you still find out). Depending on the info, there might be ways to keep it from being divined(nondetection on the phylactery, for example), but I don't know of any universal methods.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 09:41:41 AM
AyeGill, two questions:

1) Can you WRT yourself?
2) Is there any way to protect a piece of information from being divined/bardic knowledge'd/omnifiscer'd? For example, say two people know it, and both have permanent mind blank.  Would that do it?

1): No.

2): There's no end-all way to protect any given information from being known, AFAIK. Mind blank on the people who know it would work, I'd say, for Bardic Knowledge and omnifiscer, but divination spells can still find out by just reading the info directly(for example, if you ask "where does the lich keep his phylactery", even if only he knows, and he has mind blank, you still find out). Depending on the info, there might be ways to keep it from being divined(nondetection on the phylactery, for example), but I don't know of any universal methods.
There is precisely one way to do number two, per RAW: be Vecna-blooded. It's why I did it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 19, 2012, 10:22:34 AM
AyeGill, two questions:

1) Can you WRT yourself?
2) Is there any way to protect a piece of information from being divined/bardic knowledge'd/omnifiscer'd? For example, say two people know it, and both have permanent mind blank.  Would that do it?

1): No.

2): There's no end-all way to protect any given information from being known, AFAIK. Mind blank on the people who know it would work, I'd say, for Bardic Knowledge and omnifiscer, but divination spells can still find out by just reading the info directly(for example, if you ask "where does the lich keep his phylactery", even if only he knows, and he has mind blank, you still find out). Depending on the info, there might be ways to keep it from being divined(nondetection on the phylactery, for example), but I don't know of any universal methods.
There is precisely one way to do number two, per RAW: be Vecna-blooded. It's why I did it.

Vecna-blooded can only protect information about a certain person, hence it is not universal, Depending on what you take "information about the vecna-blooded" to mean. You could argue that the location of a Lich's phylactery is also information about the Lich, but you could with equal reason argue that it isn't. So the DM has to make that ruling on a case-by-case basis.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 10:29:16 AM
If I set up a Contingency of a Divination spell, and a Vecna-Blooded creature triggers the Contingency (and thus is the target of the Div spell), do I know that the Contingency got triggered?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 19, 2012, 10:41:52 AM
No. The divination spell is targeting a Vecna-Blooded creature. It therefore fails to reveal any information, including that it couldn't find out anything.

EDIT: Also, of note: Vecna Blooded does not make you immune to spells of other schools that reveal information about it. Does this mean Miracle->Contact other plane could technically penetrate the Cloak of Mystery?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 11:07:11 AM
It's emulating a divination, so I would personally say no, but it's a grey rules area. I would caution that it opens up a large can of abuse-worms if you rule that it still works, but it's your call.

Either way, it would only matter for information relating to post transformation to vecna-blooded, as per the template all information regarding the creature and what it has done is erased from existence when they gain the template.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 02:31:26 PM
OK, in this world of incredibly powerful spellcasters, I think I've come up with a way to protect information, without using Divination spells (so no problems with Mind Blank or Vecna-Blooded).

First, be Vecna-Blooded or Mind Blank'd yourself, so that Knowledge (whatever) & Bardic Knowledge won't work (as per Aye's ruling earlier).  Then, the trick is that Contingency and Sending are evocation.  So, you set up a Contingency to trigger whenever any being attempts to determine whatever information (info X) in any way, and the triggered spell is a Sending to yourself, which tells you:

1) Information X (so you can keep track of what is what)
2) Yes/No (depending on if they were successful)
3) Some sort of info which uniquely determines the being that made the attempt (like the true name or something).

Even if the last one doesn't work, you can still take steps to divine, or counter.

EDIT: #1 is only important if you do this with contingent spells, so you can have more than one at a time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 02:38:27 PM
What measurable effect occurs that would cause the cotigency to go off? AFAIK, you can't contingency things like that without some measurable means to determine it.

Also, how is the contingency determining success/failure of attempt, as well as identity of diviner?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 02:47:03 PM
Quote from: SRD
The conditions needed to bring the spell into effect must be clear, although they can be general. In all cases, the contingency immediately brings into effect the companion spell, the latter being “cast” instantaneously when the prescribed circumstances occur. If complicated or convoluted conditions are prescribed, the whole spell combination (contingency and the companion magic) may fail when called on. The companion spell occurs based solely on the stated conditions, regardless of whether you want it to.

These are general, clear conditions, which are not complicated.  It doesn't say anything about measurability.

And for the 2nd question, I have no idea.  It's very possible they won't work (I'm waiting for Aye on that one).  The fact that something is attempting to divine it, however, is the important one.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 03:34:19 PM
Just playing the role of the Devil's Advocate. :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 03:40:07 PM
Lol.

OK, for my symbiote I think I'm going to go with:

Wood Element (LA +5) Spellwarped (LA +3) Vecna-Blooded (LA +1) Petal (LA +2) Trickster Spellthief 4/Binder 1

I needed the Spellthief for Precocious Apprentice to qualify for VB, because immunity to divinations is amazing, and I can use Master Spellthief and Practiced Spellcaster to boost my CL even more.  Binder 1 gets me Naberius (for ability healing & skills/silver tongue).

With 2 feats from levels 1 & 3, and 1 feat from DCFS'd Weapon Finesse (petal bonus), that gives me Precocious Apprentice, Master Spellthief, and Practiced Spellcaster (Spellthief).

So, my new CLs:

Wizard: 15 class + 3 UM + 3 tattoo + 1 ring + 4 master spellthief = 26
KotW: 5 class + 26 wizard + 3 UM + 3 tattoo + 1 ring + 4 master spellthief = 42
Spellthief: 4 class + 4 practiced spellcaster + 3 UM + 3 tattoo + 1 ring = 15
Illusion/transmutation: 27 wizard + 43 kotw + 16 spellthief = 86
Silent Image: 29 wizard + 45 kotw + 18 spellthief = 92 +2X from earth spell

EDIT: Math!  And, I keep forgetting additional pluses.

EDIT2: Oops!  I don't need Precocious Apprentice because I qualify for VB with Trickster Spellthief 4.  So, that leaves me another feat to burn.

EDIT3: Widen Spell, I think.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 03:53:56 PM
Safe to say, I think the two of us have an easy reason to know each other now (vecna-blooded).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 03:56:37 PM
Hmm... the petal is no longer evil.  Does it lose the benefit of the Vecna-Blooded stuff besides the Cloak of Mystery?

Also, that's the symbiote and not the full-on creature.  Not sure how that changes things either.  But... yes, probably.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 04:07:11 PM
TTemplates only care about qualifying when you take them.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 19, 2012, 05:38:13 PM
So, wild and crazy thought I just had, what would everyone say to this build:

Fiend of Possession 6/Master of the Unseen Hand 4/Ghost Savage Progression 2/Random Major Bloodline 3/Thrallherd 1. Charisma score around 42-ish, haven't really put too terrible much effort into nailing that last part down. I would be burning less than 15k xp to do it, so I'd be part-way to 16th, but can't really do it without spending any xp at all. I don't think. I may be wrong on that, because I just thought of a mitigation method. But I'll deal with that later.

Yes, that build, just like that, though not in that order. No base classes.

What if I told you it could be done 100% legally, without even having to dip into anything remotely cheesy (aside from bloodlines)?

I mean, the point of this game was insane optimization, right? That certainly applies. And I've a thrall, so I can still bring some magical ownage if I needed to. Would probably bring a full Dweomerkeeper into it like I had originally planned, if I did that.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 19, 2012, 06:13:43 PM
TTemplates only care about qualifying when you take them.
Ooh! I hadn't thought of that! Time to slap unseelie fey on Nom. I originally wanted it for that extra bit of Cha, but that Winter's Chill ability (enemies within 5' get a morale penalty to saves equal to your Cha bonus) is pretty brutal.


On a completely different subject, I should mention that Nom is devoted to a custom deity, Etreveyda. But I'm pretty sure there won't be a problem with Sarasic. Etreveyda is a relatively recent invader from another reality, that maintains a small secret cult of powerful, or destined to be powerful, worshipers, rather than a large open religion.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 19, 2012, 07:06:58 PM
So... I'm thinking of going Vecna-blooded too, sacking the 3rd lv of fighter off of the symbiote, since it does nothing. Mostly because it would REALLY help with a lot of my goals.

Thing is, any time any of us walk away, then come back, none of us will remember each other.

While it would be funny to have Nigh-Omnipotent Assholes turn into "50 First Dates", it would be aggravating too.

Oh, and Mcpoyo, I could break the Hulking Hurler damage record with your build.
(click to show/hide)

EDIT:
Also, Sarasic's thoughts towards unread created by an urpriest that stole the power from the gods? Seems like it could stand as an exception. I ask this not for worship reasons, but for party cohesion reasons.
No issues from me. I won't like them, but I won't go out of my way to destroy you for just that. And the Ur-Priest thing would make me forgive quite a lot.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 07:48:14 PM
Have to be able to cast 2nd-level arcane spells for Vecna blooded.

EDIT: I added in the symbiote stuff, now I just have to fill out the spellbook.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 19, 2012, 07:57:15 PM
Have to be able to cast 2nd-level arcane spells for Vecna blooded.

Yeah, cause there's no way to do that w/o a level investment.

Seriously, what, two feats?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 19, 2012, 07:57:57 PM
Lol, I was just reminding you ;)

Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 20, 2012, 04:14:18 AM
Just to be curious, Sir Percival, where do you get the Wood Element ? the wood elemental I have in the crystalkeep compendium does not make you a plant.
Greenbound is nice, after all, but it's not cheap.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 04:24:26 AM
It's from MoP.  If there's no Plane of Wood (which there isn't in this standard Great Wheel cosmology), it becomes a native of the Material Plane of the Plant type.  And, it gives you both elemental and plant immunities.  Plus, it works on a lot more creature types.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 20, 2012, 04:42:18 AM
Nice. Thanks for the information.

By the way, I'm still pondering for our nice little keep. What do you prefer :
- having a common keep where everyone live, got his study and laboratory, with gateways to your private demiplanes ?
- just use it as a mobile base, everyone keeping his private house on his own demiplane ?

At the beginning, I can't afford more than one Two-ways portal to one plane, as they are 150k each and I can't craft them for the moment. My cohort will only be able to do it at lvl 15 and items to rise his CL up to at least 17.

At least, I know what I want my cohort's forge to look like.
(click to show/hide)
and the house something like this...
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 07:47:06 AM
nothing that says we can't do a communal area, and then people can add portals to their own private stuff as they desire. Plane shift will get you to your own place until you build a permanent portal, after all.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 08:42:20 AM
Question.  How would it work for a continuous item of Suffer the Flesh with the Con damage?  Would it just be inflicted on the caster who supplied the spell for the item, or would it apply to the user of the item?

If the former, then I have another custom item to run past you...


Also, what are the numbers for Rods of Persist?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 08:44:46 AM
Also, what are the numbers for Rods of Persist?
Ridiculously expensive, most likely, since the others follow a pattern that's partially based on level adjustment, and partially based on abusability.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 20, 2012, 08:52:00 AM
The Suffer the Flesh item would give you the constitution damage when you equipped it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 09:27:18 AM
The Suffer the Flesh item would give you the constitution damage when you equipped it.

Meh... I was going to turn it into an item, but honestly a >80 CL is probably ok for everyday use, and if I need it I can just cast it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 09:44:48 AM
Also, what are the numbers for Rods of Persist?

From over on ENWorld, IDR who did this.
(click to show/hide)

Also, any thoughts on the "50 first dates" dilemma of us being vecna-blooded? NVM, just re-read the template, don't know what I was thinking.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 10:03:53 AM
Just don't use the Enigma Aura without a contingent Modify Memory on yourself or something.  The effect isn't built into Cloak of Mystery, so it isn't essential.

Ransom can take out an army with a shadow caltrops...

EDIT: Edit ninja'd!  Lol.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 10:07:04 AM
Aye, a ruling if you would: the God-blooded templates say you lose them if you ever fulfill the clause in the DR ability, does that remove the LA as well?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 10:11:18 AM
Is it just me, or does Arcane Thesis allow you to apply Sanctum Spell for a -1 level adjustment (as long as you do other stuff to make sure the level doesn't drop below the original)?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 10:12:51 AM
Is it just me, or does Arcane Thesis allow you to apply Sanctum Spell for a -1 level adjustment (as long as you do other stuff to make sure the level doesn't drop below the original)?

Eratta'd. AT cannot reduce the LA below 0.
EDIT: EDIT: ah, re-read question, I see what you did there.

EDIT:
Ransom can take out an army with a shadow caltrops...

The game is Nigh-Omnipotent Assholes, if you CAN'T take out an army / round, then your build isn't strong enough.

You're a SCM with extra cheese. An extra broken SCM.

If we were to sit here and detail all of the ways you could uber-pwn a land area, or all of the people in it, we'd not get anything else done.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 10:16:59 AM
I just like the combo of Reserves of Strength and Caltrops (a 0th-level spell) for >9000 ft^2 of caltrops which have >+45 bonus to attack.  And are 80% real, out of a 1st-level slot.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 10:19:46 AM
Don't forget about using Launch to fire non-existent colossal sized bolts at people that split and take out the entire countryside.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 10:24:14 AM
Nah, the size of the item isn't dependent on CL.  I could, however, probably TK the moon.  If Atropus shows up, I'll toss him back the way he came.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 10:35:28 AM
Hmmm.... I'm thinking about the earlier Dragon conversation. I think I'll have one of my two 6th level followers be a Wyrmling Loredrake Steel Dragon, with Riddled and Spell-hoarding psychoses. (Riddled to qualify for Spellhoarding.) I can always Helm the thing into being Chaotic Neutral if need be. Or CE and have it follow Sarasic too  :devil.

Fluff-wise, I can see a lot of reasons a super-prodigy spellcasting dragon would be less than thrilled with the gods. Spellcatching is a great supplement to my counter-spell focus. And it could advance it's age category quite far.

What do you all think?

Nah, the size of the item isn't dependent on CL.  I could, however, probably TK the moon.  If Atropus shows up, I'll toss him back the way he came.

Legendary.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 11:00:02 AM
I like it, except that as soon as its age category goes up, it'll no longer qualify.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 11:03:57 AM
I like it, except that as soon as its age category goes up, it'll no longer qualify.
There's a spell to fix that. Couple spells, actually. All are evil, though.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 11:13:42 AM
I like it, except that as soon as its age category goes up, it'll no longer qualify.
There's a spell to fix that. Couple spells, actually. All are evil, though.

@ Sir P; As Mcpoyo pointed out, but also, it would only make it ineligible if it was something that actually increased it's power permanently.
The trick is: Wyrmling gets artificially older only temporarily. If Aye rules that it would cease to be my follower temporarily while it is more powerful, due to temporarily having a higher ECL (if temporary buffs / debuffs change ECL, dragon age changers make rules gray here), then I would just have it Dominated on top of its followership. That way, even when it's big, it serves me, and when it's small it is too loyal to have issues with the fact that I make an effort to keep it loyal when it's big.

@ Mcpoyo "All are Evil, though." Ummm.... Not really an issue here.


EDIT: Bump to make sure Aye sees this
Aye, a ruling if you would: the God-blooded templates say you lose them if you ever fulfill the clause in the DR ability, does that remove the LA as well?

EDIT: EDIT: Also Aye, how do you feel about Shapechange Abuses?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 20, 2012, 11:18:50 AM
I like it, except that as soon as its age category goes up, it'll no longer qualify.
There's a spell to fix that. Couple spells, actually. All are evil, though.

@ Sir P; As Mcpoyo pointed out, but also, it would only make it ineligible if it was something that actually increased it's power permanently.
The trick is: Wyrmling gets artificially older only temporarily. If Aye rules that it would cease to be my follower temporarily while it is more powerful, due to temporarily having a higher ECL (if temporary buffs / debuffs change ECL, dragon age changers make rules gray here), then I would just have it Dominated on top of its followership. That way, even when it's big, it serves me, and when it's small it is too loyal to have issues with the fact that I make an effort to keep it loyal when it's big.

@ Mcpoyo "All are Evil, though." Ummm.... Not really an issue here.


EDIT: Bump to make sure Aye sees this
Aye, a ruling if you would: the God-blooded templates say you lose them if you ever fulfill the clause in the DR ability, does that remove the LA as well?

Hilariously, it totally does remove the LA. And you get to keep all the really good abilities from vecna-blooded.

Oh, and if you bump the ECL of your followers/cohort, they're still loyal unless it's a permanent or instantaneous effect.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 11:20:26 AM
You mean the single really good ability.  That is awesome!  I need to adjust my symbiote...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 11:24:35 AM
Hilariously, it totally does remove the LA. And you get to keep all the really good abilities from vecna-blooded.

(http://i396.photobucket.com/albums/pp49/ometimes6332/excellent-mr-burns.jpg)

Also, so ya'll know what I'm thinking for the dragons age. Death Ward (or some other means of immunity to negative levels) + Persisted Sonorous Hum (SC) + Hasten the End (DL: HOotS).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 11:50:57 AM
Oh crap, I think I broke this open.  I now have unlimited CL > 100 Shadow Miracles...not infinite, it still takes me actions, but I have as many as I want.  I can cast Invisible Shadow Miracles out of 5th-level slots, and I'll have a command-word item of Mage's Lucubration, which can regen spells of 5th-level or lower.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 11:58:13 AM
Oh crap, I think I broke this open.  I now have unlimited CL > 100 Shadow Miracles...not infinite, it still takes me actions, but I have as many as I want.  I can cast Invisible Shadow Miracles out of 5th-level slots, and I'll have a command-word item of Mage's Lucubration, which can regen spells of 5th-level or lower.

I understand, and have done, all of that except, how are you getting them out of 5th level spells?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 11:59:58 AM
Probably arcane thesis and sanctum spell.

Also, no infinite or near infinite, per the original thread...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 12:02:53 PM
Probably arcane thesis and sanctum spell.

Also, no infinite or near infinite, per the original thread...

It is no more "infinite" than the HP of a creature with fast healing.

Or any different than the fact that I intend to have so many pearls that spells / day are irrelevant.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 20, 2012, 12:06:03 PM
I wouldn't call this infinite, at least not in the way that I prohibit. It's just taking the already infinite spell slots from an at will item of Mage's Lucubration, and making them more useful. It's no more infinite than any command word item.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 12:09:00 PM
Oh crap, I think I broke this open.  I now have unlimited CL > 100 Shadow Miracles...not infinite, it still takes me actions, but I have as many as I want.  I can cast Invisible Shadow Miracles out of 5th-level slots, and I'll have a command-word item of Mage's Lucubration, which can regen spells of 5th-level or lower.

I understand, and have done, all of that except, how are you getting them out of 5th level spells?

To cast a Shadow Miracle, I need a 10th-level Silent Image.  I Heighten to 8th level, which (with Easy Metamagic) costs me a 7th-level slot, and gives me a 9th-level spell with Earth Spell.  Then I apply Sanctum Spell, which (with Arcane Thesis) gives me a 10th for a 6th.  Then, I tack on Invisible Spell, which (with AT) drops it to 5th level.

EDIT: And it's not infinite in that it takes a standard action to use the item and a standard action to cast the spell, and there's a limited amount of time per day.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 12:18:05 PM
To cast a Shadow Miracle, I need a 10th-level Silent Image.  I Heighten to 8th level, which (with Easy Metamagic) costs me a 7th-level slot, and gives me a 9th-level spell with Earth Spell.  Then I apply Sanctum Spell, which (with Arcane Thesis) gives me a 10th for a 6th. Then, I tack on Invisible Spell, which (with AT) drops it to 5th level.

Remember, Lubrication checks the spell level, not the spell slot used. This is how people do Repeated Sanctum-Downed Lubrication combo'd with Repeated Sanctum-Downed Rary's Conversion to swap out their spells prepared.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 12:26:05 PM
So, given my calculations, what is the "actual spell level" for lucubration purposes?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 20, 2012, 12:33:44 PM
So, given my calculations, what is the "actual spell level" for lucubration purposes?

The same 10th that is letting you use Miracle. And setting the DC for the spell. And any other level-dependent calculation.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 12:38:17 PM
So, given my calculations, what is the "actual spell level" for lucubration purposes?

The same 10th that is letting you use Miracle. And setting the DC for the spell. And any other level-dependent calculation.

Actually, that shouldn't matter, since I'm burning an ACTUAL 5th-level spell to cast Silent Image spontaneously w/ Signature Spell.  So I just regen the prepared spell I axed and I should be all good.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 01:01:38 PM
Do we roll our hit points using Invisible Castle, or take average?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 20, 2012, 01:10:16 PM
Do we roll our hit points using Invisible Castle, or take average?
Average
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 20, 2012, 06:05:52 PM
If I copy a banned-school spell into my spellbook, can I then use UM's expanded spell knowledge to add it to the KotW spells known?  Or can I only port over spells from non-banned schools?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 20, 2012, 11:15:23 PM
There is a feat in Lost Empires of Faerun that allows you to learn and cast a spell from a prohibited school.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 21, 2012, 07:39:42 AM
True, but that's not really the point of my question.  I could just cast that spell from my wiz slots, where I have a lot more.  I'm looking for ways to get prohibited spells on my KotW list so I can do that.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 21, 2012, 08:16:27 AM
Could do a shuffle, worst case scenario, grab the feat long enough to swap lists the remove it again.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 21, 2012, 05:41:30 PM
OK, I think I'm done (entirely).  Managed to grab Dimension Hop onto my KotW list so now I have a spell to teleport out of an AMF when I Invoke Magic.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 21, 2012, 07:25:02 PM
Question (and double post): how does True Seeing interact with Cloak of Mystery?  How does it interact with Nondetection?

EDIT: question #2.  Can Shadow Miracle duplicate metamagicked spells, as long as the total level is 8 or less?  If so, would it have to be a metamagic feat I know?

EDIT2: Holy crap... with all the hugely-boosted CL's in the party, we should have not so much trouble with SR.  So... how about Irresistible Spell, from the Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Guide?  +4 level metamagic which REMOVES ALL SAVES.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 22, 2012, 12:05:27 PM
EDIT2: Holy crap... with all the hugely-boosted CL's in the party, we should have not so much trouble with SR.  So... how about Irresistible Spell, from the Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Guide?  +4 level metamagic which REMOVES ALL SAVES.

 :twitch

 :plotting

 :love

 :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love

@ Ayegill
~ Y'know what. Can I get the other 6 Anti-feat rolls Ayegill? It seems I need a few more feats.
~ How do you feel about Shapechange abuses?
~ The way domain staffs (CC) are written leaves me wondering; can I prep the spells out of a domain staff with a Metamagic feat when I prep the rest of my spells?
~ Can we use Wish / Miracle to Permanence spells that normally can't be (like Superior Resistance)?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 22, 2012, 12:45:23 PM
~ How do you feel about Shapechange abuses?
~ Can we use Wish / Miracle to Permanence spells that normally can't be (like Superior Resistance)?

He's letting me RoS shapechange to become a Phane or a Hagumemnon or whatever... so he's probably fine with it.

And, why Sup Res?  It's 24 hour base duration, just get a Minor Schema and cast it every day.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 22, 2012, 12:50:16 PM
~ How do you feel about Shapechange abuses?
He's letting me RoS shapechange to become a Phane or a Hagumemnon or whatever... so he's probably fine with it.

Well, that's all I wanted with it. So that answers that. Wonder how far I can take the Hagumemnon before rocks fall. But also, since he allows his Shaedlings to go to the furthest extent with their gossamer, then if you change into one... Profit!

~ Can we use Wish / Miracle to Permanence spells that normally can't be (like Superior Resistance)?
And, why Sup Res?  It's 24 hour base duration, just get a Minor Schema and cast it every day.

There are a lot of spells like that though, some are all day, some are just really close to it. Like the Primal spells, Heart of X spells, Favor of the Martyr, Etc.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 22, 2012, 03:04:31 PM
EDIT2: Holy crap... with all the hugely-boosted CL's in the party, we should have not so much trouble with SR.  So... how about Irresistible Spell, from the Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Guide?  +4 level metamagic which REMOVES ALL SAVES.

 :twitch

 :plotting

 :love

 :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love
I actually find this more worrisome than pleasing. PC use of Irresistible spell means BBEG use of it as well. I don't suppose there is a feat, SQ, class ability, or item out there that provides immunity to Irresistible?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 22, 2012, 03:08:15 PM
It IS kind of scary to consider that used on us... maybe we should all agree (including Aye) not to include it?

Question (and double post): how does True Seeing interact with Cloak of Mystery?  How does it interact with Nondetection?

EDIT: question #2.  Can Shadow Miracle duplicate metamagicked spells, as long as the total level is 8 or less?  If so, would it have to be a metamagic feat I know?

Bump.

Question #3: What's the ruling on how Dweomer of Transference works?  Is it anyone's spells or just the caster of the Dweomer?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 22, 2012, 03:17:21 PM
The more I see what can your characters do, the more I think mine is not scary enough.
Though, concerning buffs such as Primal spells and others, do not worry. I'm a godamned war weaver, I'll cast them on everyone with one cast.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 22, 2012, 03:18:10 PM
EDIT2: Holy crap... with all the hugely-boosted CL's in the party, we should have not so much trouble with SR.  So... how about Irresistible Spell, from the Kingdoms of Kalamar Player's Guide?  +4 level metamagic which REMOVES ALL SAVES.

 :twitch

 :plotting

 :love

 :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love :love
I actually find this more worrisome than pleasing. PC use of Irresistible spell means BBEG use of it as well. I don't suppose there is a feat, SQ, class ability, or item out there that provides immunity to Irresistible?
Wasn't it errata'd to be a +10 to the DC?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 22, 2012, 03:21:10 PM
The more I see what can your characters do, the more I think mine is not scary enough.
Though, concerning buffs such as Primal spells and others, do not worry. I'm a godamned war weaver, I'll cast them on everyone with one cast.
you and I can be buddies, I don't have any single shtick that's mind bogglingly powerful, since there's no longer a fanatic setting for diplomacy.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 22, 2012, 03:29:58 PM
Well, I did open the symbiotic can of worms, at least. concerning the raw power, I don't mind not being the most uber : what I fear is to be a burden.
Anyway, I do bring mass buff, "infinite" wealth & items, a nice little place to live and go adventuring, roleplay opportunities.  the fun factor is optimised enough, I just have doubts on my firepower.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 22, 2012, 03:30:41 PM
You don't need extra firepower.  Handing out buffs is very important, and having cohorts to do crafting is ESSENTIAL.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 22, 2012, 04:25:18 PM
It IS kind of scary to consider that used on us... maybe we should all agree (including Aye) not to include it?

Question (and double post): how does True Seeing interact with Cloak of Mystery?  How does it interact with Nondetection?

EDIT: question #2.  Can Shadow Miracle duplicate metamagicked spells, as long as the total level is 8 or less?  If so, would it have to be a metamagic feat I know?

Bump.

Question #3: What's the ruling on how Dweomer of Transference works?  Is it anyone's spells or just the caster of the Dweomer?

No, and only your own spells(as to not hand out a "free spell immunity for everyone" button)

@ Ayegill
~ Y'know what. Can I get the other 6 Anti-feat rolls Ayegill? It seems I need a few more feats.
~ How do you feel about Shapechange abuses?
~ The way domain staffs (CC) are written leaves me wondering; can I prep the spells out of a domain staff with a Metamagic feat when I prep the rest of my spells?
~ Can we use Wish / Miracle to Permanence spells that normally can't be (like Superior Resistance)?

1d1000=87, 1d1000=381, 1d1000=450, 1d1000=724, 1d1000=659, 1d1000=766 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/3386570/)

Domain staves: no. You burn spell slots to cast spells from that domain, and can burn higher-level spell slots to apply metamagic.
Wish/Miracle: no. That shit would get out of hand really fast with this group of players.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 22, 2012, 07:40:39 PM
Well, I did open the symbiotic can of worms, at least. concerning the raw power, I don't mind not being the most uber : what I fear is to be a burden.
Anyway, I do bring mass buff, "infinite" wealth & items, a nice little place to live and go adventuring, roleplay opportunities.  the fun factor is optimised enough, I just have doubts on my firepower.

You're worried? Thought I was the only one. Seriously, while Ransom (and Kuro's character if he joins) can be the cannon, you buff up to massive power levels.

My shtick is Immediate-Action Counter-spelling. Once per round, I can go  :fu to other casters. Once. per. round. What's more is, I have to hold back that ability. If I blow it on the Cleric casting Implosion, then the Wizard casts MDJ, I just screwed the group because of not countering the worse of the two. If the Cleric casts Implosion, kills Nom (b/c I didn't counter, and he failed a save), then the Wizard does nothing of consequence,  I just screwed the group because of not countering the worse of the two.

So, don't worry about your firepower, you'll definitely contribute your part to the group. I have a one-shot trick that is a constant catch-22 of opportunity cost.

The most important thing? The Gentleman's Agreement (http://dungeons.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:TK-Squared/My_View_on_The_Gentleman's_Agreement) says it's about having fun. I can't argue with that. You said you'd have fun, so don't worry about the details.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

I'll agree to no Irresistible. It is way too powerful of a feat.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Domain staves: no. You burn spell slots to cast spells from that domain, and can burn higher-level spell slots to apply metamagic.
I need to find another way to cast Shapechange then. I really want to persist it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 22, 2012, 07:52:37 PM
Apply reach or ocular spell to it first.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 22, 2012, 07:56:48 PM
Do multiple castings of Heroics fall under the Same Effect with Differing Results rule?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 22, 2012, 08:01:09 PM
Apply reach or ocular spell to it first.

I need another way to cast Shapechange. It isn't on the Cleric spell list. And it's persist-able out of the box.

Do multiple castings of Heroics fall under the Same Effect with Differing Results rule?
Generally, yes.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 22, 2012, 09:42:29 PM
How many Shadowcraft Cookies can I have lying around?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 23, 2012, 04:14:52 AM
I'm sure you can make quite a few. But between hungry adventurers and invisible mini-giants, keeping the cookies around might be difficult.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 23, 2012, 09:24:10 AM
alright, items done, as well as usuals buffs. The forteress is almost done, so I do think I will be ready soon.
I've changed a bit Aarda's symbiot build, to squeeze in 4 levels of Spellguard, which I qualify through the skills given by dragon hit dices. Thus, I end up with a way to share defensive personnal buffs with everyone, and a CL 26.
As for how I intend to play Aarda : massive buffs for everyone. Then go to town with buffs gish-style like. If a particular spell is needed, get it  thanks to the Accorn of Far Travel Hatran trick.
129 Hp at the end, 161 when buffed. Quite nice for a spellcaster.
next steps in the build :
- finish Incantatrix to reduce metamagic costs by 1.
- snatch cleric spells somehow, through Rainbow Servant I do think, to become Buff incarnate.
- finish Hatran for great circle leader.

And I'm still not the scariest of the bunch. Though, as a godamned arcane spellcaster, I can :
- at the end know every spell that exists except enchantment ;
- switch among them on the fly like the wet dream of all sorcerers LIKE A BOSS;
- buff everyone on the team efficiently like a madman ;
- mass heal efficiently if needed ;
- be a close-combat monster all day long with 3 mere spells, and share one of those with everyone.

Now, I do have a question : AMFs and other Disjunctions. What do we have against that ?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 23, 2012, 09:31:07 AM
Now, I do have a question : AMFs and other Disjunctions. What do we have against that ?

AMF's are Invoke or MDJ. Chain is your save, or me. AMR is your touch AC, or me. RoDJ is your touch AC, or me. MDJ is my nemisis, I will do anything possible to stop it, so me.

Basically, I'm playing blue, and my biggest job is the counter-counter-counter chain (that blues are so despised for).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 23, 2012, 09:43:53 AM
My defense against AMF is an item of Invoke Magic + Dimension Hop.  My defense against MDJ is likely to be a Ring of Counterspells, or hanging around you & Arias.

Aye, I updated the Bracelet of Remembrance to include Rary's Conversion (using the multiple similar abilities rules), with both Conversion & Lucubration Sanctum-downed to 5 to save on the price.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 23, 2012, 09:52:00 AM
Aye, I updated the Bracelet of Remembrance to include Rary's Conversion (using the multiple similar abilities rules), with both Conversion & Lucubration Sanctum-downed to 5 to save on the price.

Well, if you want to save on price... Odd optimization project: minimizing caster levels (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19869590/Odd_optimization_project:_minimizing_caster_levels&post_num=6)

There, now you can have it sanctum-downed to a 5th level spell with a CL of 1.

Gotta love TO.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 23, 2012, 10:08:12 AM
That is quite bizarre.  But, price isn't a BIG deal, obviously, not with our own crafters.

And Harald, you have way more HP than Ransom does... his saving grace is that he'll be very difficult to hit with anything (with his 161 AC, 115 touch AC, and saves in the +30s).

I'm just wondering whether I should be giving him SR... He could have SR>100 with a Shadow Miracle.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 23, 2012, 10:19:53 AM
I do have 3d8 HD and then all d4... but with a +7 bonus from a boosted Con, you got a lot of hit points  :D
Though, I do find my AC to be lacking, in the 30 something, 20 for touch. I'll need to boost that with buffs and items once we play.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 23, 2012, 10:27:35 AM
That is quite bizarre.  But, price isn't a BIG deal, obviously, not with our own crafters.

And Harald, you have way more HP than Ransom does... his saving grace is that he'll be very difficult to hit with anything (with his 161 AC, 115 touch AC, and saves in the +30s).

I'm just wondering whether I should be giving him SR... He could have SR>100 with a Shadow Miracle.

Yeah.

I would say no to the SR. Not everyone in the party does have your CL, and you cannot lower SR granted by spells, only SR form race (no rules quote right now, AFB; Rules Compendium IIRC). So we wouldn't be able to affect you beneficially if you used spells to gain high SR.

And all of us will get boosted in HP / AC once we start. Heck, in the game where my SCM is, he has nothing but d4's, but because of all his Con-boosts, has 302HP at lv16, and an AC of 92 (touch 87).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 23, 2012, 10:28:20 AM
Ransom can help with AC.  Ransom's RoS Barkskin gives +40 natural, RoS Magic Vestment gives +23 enh to armor, RoS Armor of Darkness gives +32 deflection, and all only need to be done 1/week.

EDIT: I forgot, he has racial SR 10+HD from Spellwarped.  26 isn't much, though.

EDIT2: Hey Arias, if you ever want to go super-Psi, I can make you a shadowcraft cookie of Mental Pinnacle at >100 CL.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 23, 2012, 12:14:12 PM
Man, working on my RoS mini-handbook, I really want to make an RoS Arcane Heirophant build now. 
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 23, 2012, 12:16:30 PM
EDIT2: Hey Arias, if you ever want to go super-Psi, I can make you a shadowcraft cookie of Mental Pinnacle at >100 CL.
:devil
Man, working on my RoS mini-handbook, I really want to make an RoS Arcane Heirophant build now. 
This is why Mont gave us Cohorts :)


I think that since my name as Antinomy has been revealed as a pseudonym, I think the super-Psi has sealed the deal toward me stealing the name Nick Scryer. (not really)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 23, 2012, 01:13:21 PM
Sucks, I was looking at a way to get a dragon as an animal companion (for age-category shenanigans), but there doesn't seem to be one.  I could get a dragon as a familiar, but if it goes above wyrmling it can't be a familiar anymore.

Anyway, here's a build skeleton for the arcane heirophant cohort.

White Dragonspawn Loredrake DWK Sorcerer 1/Druid 5/Mystic Theurge 4/Arcane Heirophant 10

Some Feats: Precocious Apprentice, Greater Rite of Passage, Druidic Theurgy, Theurgic Bond, Reserves of Strength, Arcane Disciple (Animal, Sun), Natural Bond

19th-level Druid and Sorc casting.  Companion/Familiar is 29th level in both (thanks to AH and Theurgic Bond).  CL for druid/sorc spells is 38+ (with whatever else I can tack on there).

Question, Aye: Can I use the Epic Familiar & Animal Companion progressions to take advantage of this?  Obviously it won't be quite so high when I get the cohort.


On an unrelated note... I was considering the Diversified Casting feat from Dragon 325 for Ransom, to grab him 3 teleportation spells.  There are two questions for this:
1) What are the 3 best teleportation spells?  I have Dim Door, Greater Teleport, Greater Plane Shift.  Thoughts?
2) It seems that the spells you grab are not limited to spells which were originally on your list, by RAW.  Thoughts?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 23, 2012, 01:29:07 PM
Evacuation Rune, complete scoundrel, page 98.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 23, 2012, 01:31:42 PM
Evacuation Rune is a great spell, and I'm using it to incredible effect in another game, but it has a couple of severe limitations: 24 hour duration, and no inter-planar travel.  Wouldn't greater teleport be better, despite the greater level?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 23, 2012, 01:38:24 PM
Evacuation Rune is a great spell, and I'm using it to incredible effect in another game, but it has a couple of severe limitations: 24 hour duration, and no inter-planar travel.  Wouldn't greater teleport be better, despite the greater level?
Depends on the use. If your caster level is high enough that carry capacity for teleport is never an issue, sure, otherwise, the lower level makes it pretty useful.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 23, 2012, 04:23:02 PM
Now, I do have a question : AMFs and other Disjunctions. What do we have against that ?
Nom has Iron Heart Surge for AMFs and a crazy high will save for MDJ (+50 before buffs). I'm also considering going around in a Extraordinary Spell Aim'ed AMF. Maybe just on special occasions.

Sucks, I was looking at a way to get a dragon as an animal companion (for age-category shenanigans), but there doesn't seem to be one.  I could get a dragon as a familiar, but if it goes above wyrmling it can't be a familiar anymore.
You've already looked at and decided against Zhentarim Skymage right? It doesn't work with age category hijinks, but with a really high Cha bonus you might be able to get some mileage out of it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 23, 2012, 04:42:29 PM
I actually can get 37/37 for the familiar companion, if I (a) pay attention to my +4 sorc levels, and (b) use Obtain Familiar instead of the base familiar ability.

Checking out ZSM right now.

EDIT: Pretty kewl class, but not right for this build.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 24, 2012, 08:09:35 AM
So, since it'll help me plan out my daily buffing routine, what spells/buffs should regularly be expected from other party member/will be sitting in the war weaver's quiescent weave? No point duplicating a buff myself if there's a party buff going on.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 24, 2012, 08:26:18 AM
I can easily replace my Conviction with a Mass Conviction, if you all would like +21 moral bonus to your saves.  Other than that, most of my stuff is single-target... though as I said to Harald, some of my buffs are 1/week since the durations are so long, so if other party members would like some it's trivial to hand them out during down time.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 24, 2012, 12:15:17 PM
Could I use a Shadow Miracle to replicate Revive Outsider with my absurd CL and bring dead gods back to life?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 24, 2012, 12:31:10 PM
Could I use a Shadow Miracle to replicate Revive Outsider with my absurd CL and bring dead gods back to life?

If you could find his body, yes.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 24, 2012, 12:36:46 PM
Oh, crap.  Missed the target line.  Well, there's a quest for you!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 24, 2012, 01:11:23 PM
Next questions:

1) How does True Seeing interact with Nondetection, Mind Blank, and Cloak of Mystery?
2) Does the Acorn oFT qualify me for Earth Spell even if I'm flying?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 24, 2012, 01:19:02 PM
Next questions:

1) How does True Seeing interact with Nondetection, Mind Blank, and Cloak of Mystery?
2) Does the Acorn oFT qualify me for Earth Spell even if I'm flying?

1) True seeing doesn't affect Mind Blank/Nondetection. It doesn't work on people with Cloak of Mystery
2) Yes
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 24, 2012, 01:29:42 PM
There's precedent for using wish or miracle to recreate a dead body, and then targeting it with revive spells, in several other spell effects, in order to raise someone from the dead.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 24, 2012, 01:37:25 PM
There's precedent for using wish or miracle to recreate a dead body, and then targeting it with revive spells, in several other spell effects, in order to raise someone from the dead.

I call intervention by other deities with lots of divination spells to cast and nothing better to do.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 24, 2012, 09:35:29 PM
There's precedent for using wish or miracle to recreate a dead body, and then targeting it with revive spells, in several other spell effects, in order to raise someone from the dead.

I call intervention by other deities with lots of divination spells to cast and nothing better to do.
That might be an awesome way to start the campaign. A shadowy network of powers-that-be foresee PCs as amongst those likely to upset the status quo.  So they send enforcers to preemptively track down/set up/neutralize/etc. potential problems. The PC's patrons may, in turn, arrange circumstances so that the characters get together in the first place.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 25, 2012, 04:01:24 AM
There's precedent for using wish or miracle to recreate a dead body, and then targeting it with revive spells, in several other spell effects, in order to raise someone from the dead.

I call intervention by other deities with lots of divination spells to cast and nothing better to do.
That might be an awesome way to start the campaign. A shadowy network of powers-that-be foresee PCs as amongst those likely to upset the status quo.  So they send enforcers to preemptively track down/set up/neutralize/etc. potential problems. The PC's patrons may, in turn, arrange circumstances so that the characters get together in the first place.

Patrons. That implies anybody has a reason to help you guys.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 25, 2012, 05:41:44 AM
Well beings such as Sarasic, Vecna, and Etreveyda stand to benefit from a disruption of the status quo. And thus any/all of them might manipulate the PCs towards those ends. I didn't mean that any of them would go out of their way to be helpful as such.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 25, 2012, 05:58:04 AM
Well beings such as Sarasic, Vecna, and Etreveyda stand to benefit from a disruption of the status quo. And thus any/all of them might manipulate the PCs towards those ends. I didn't mean that any of them would go out of their way to be helpful as such.

Well Sasaric isn't in a position to influence event directly. He works through his cult, which is completely controlled by a PC. Etreveyda may be working that angle, I don't know enough about him yet to judge.

Vecna is of course manipulating everyone all the time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 25, 2012, 10:23:06 AM
There's precedent for using wish or miracle to recreate a dead body, and then targeting it with revive spells, in several other spell effects, in order to raise someone from the dead.

I call intervention by other deities with lots of divination spells to cast and nothing better to do.
That might be an awesome way to start the campaign. A shadowy network of powers-that-be foresee PCs as amongst those likely to upset the status quo.  So they send enforcers to preemptively track down/set up/neutralize/etc. potential problems. The PC's patrons other people of the world who don't like the status quo may, in turn, arrange circumstances so that the characters get together in the first place.
Fix'd
And of this group there may be many.
Since in this world the status quo is "We're tier 1, ya'll are our bitches" and being good is an automatic -1 to the tier you're in.

I'll grant that we may not have patrons, but along that line we would have people who wouldn't mind seeing us partially succeed. Enough to destroy the current world orders, but not create any new ones anyway.
Or at the very least, people who would prefer to direct us against their enemies, so they could take out the weakened survivor.


Really, so far it looks like all you have to do is get us together in the first place.
Ransom and I would both be studying the gods. He wants to make one, I want to destroy them. Who has the easiest time destroying a god? Another god. If he can make his own god, maybe I can too, this would bear studying. Plus it would grant more insight on how the gods gained power, which may lead to how to remove said power. For his part: If I kill gods, then that may mean that there is more divine power to go around, assisting the possible ascendance of Syrrah.
Aarda, wants to be the best Hátalara. She's ambitious, and wants to be know far and wide. If this group were to succeed at half of the crap they want to, she'll have her fame. And her power.
Not enough info on Nom or *Unnamed Thrall of Malconthet* to say at this point, much less Kuro's character if he joins, but it looks like there will be a few common points of interest there too.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 25, 2012, 10:38:35 AM
You are probably the most likely to upset the status quo, by virtue of being... "loose cannons".
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 25, 2012, 01:30:01 PM
So far, my motivations lead to the pursuit of personal power and influence,  there's a couple things on the fringes of that that are slowly developing in my head, but nothing concrete I want to put down on paper, yet.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 25, 2012, 07:02:52 PM
I may have a solution for MDJ & Antimagic fields.

Ransom could (whenever necessary, or all the time) drop a widened Otiluke's Suppressing Field [Abjuration], with Extraordinary Spell Aim to miss whoever needs missing.  Arias's char will still have Dispel Psi to nuke stuff.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 25, 2012, 07:11:41 PM
That would actually work rather well, I think.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 25, 2012, 08:21:51 PM
Even better idea: Ransom can hand out cookies of aimed suppressing fields.  We can each have our own immunity to abjurations that we can cast through.  :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 25, 2012, 10:41:19 PM
That's a tasty cookie!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 26, 2012, 03:13:31 AM
Really, so far it looks like all you have to do is get us together in the first place.
Ransom and I would both be studying the gods. He wants to make one, I want to destroy them. Who has the easiest time destroying a god? Another god. If he can make his own god, maybe I can too, this would bear studying. Plus it would grant more insight on how the gods gained power, which may lead to how to remove said power. For his part: If I kill gods, then that may mean that there is more divine power to go around, assisting the possible ascendance of Syrrah.
Aarda, wants to be the best Hátalara. She's ambitious, and wants to be know far and wide. If this group were to succeed at half of the crap they want to, she'll have her fame. And her power.
Not enough info on Nom or *Unnamed Thrall of Malconthet* to say at this point, much less Kuro's character if he joins, but it looks like there will be a few common points of interest there too.

Nom's long-term goal is to found what she calls 'The Perfected Collective'. The Collective is a mass mind with the memories and abilities of all the great powers of the universe, capable of replicating itself at will. She's not in a great hurry, and is already at least a couple of hundred years old. But the idea of assimilating gods makes her both salivate and get a little ... erm exited.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 26, 2012, 11:45:35 AM
Back to the "party buffs" topic, if our War Weaver wants to hit everyone with Mantle of the Icy Soul, Ransom can drop Algid Enchantment for large bonuses.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 26, 2012, 08:59:40 PM
For the Arcane Heirophant, which is better -- getting +2 sorc levels (so 9th-level spells pre-epic) from loredrake, or getting the entire druid list as sorc spells (and therefore doubling my CLs from druidic theurgy) from child of eberron?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 26, 2012, 10:04:12 PM
The first, because the second can be replicated via wishes and miracles, while the second is irrelevant because it still won't get 9th arcane pre-epic anyhow.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 27, 2012, 12:11:57 AM
Yeah, that's what I was thinking.

So, I've been redoing my CL calculations for Ransom (http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=3554.0) in a more rigorous fashion, and if I'm correct then his CL is actually somewhat lower than I had originally thought.  So, two more questions for Aye.

1) Would a person immune to Con damage gain the benefit of an item of Suffer the Flesh when they put it on?
2) Earth Spell is worded oddly.  If I Heighten a Silent Image to 9th (and it becomes 11th) level, but it's cast out of a 5th-level slot because of other crap, how much do I add to the CL?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 27, 2012, 12:18:06 AM
2) Earth Spell is worded oddly.  If I Heighten a Silent Image to 9th (and it becomes 11th) level, but it's cast out of a 5th-level slot because of other crap, how much do I add to the CL?

1>2 +1
2>3 +1
3>4 +1
4>5 +1
5>6 +1
6>7 +1
7>8 +1
8>9 +1
Total: +8

That's on it's own. I realize you mess with the mechanics in a lot of ways, but all of that is separate from ES.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 27, 2012, 03:51:50 AM
1) Would a person immune to Con damage gain the benefit of an item of Suffer the Flesh when they put it on?
No.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 27, 2012, 06:11:21 AM
2) Earth Spell is worded oddly.  If I Heighten a Silent Image to 9th (and it becomes 11th) level, but it's cast out of a 5th-level slot because of other crap, how much do I add to the CL?

1>2 +1
2>3 +1
3>4 +1
4>5 +1
5>6 +1
6>7 +1
7>8 +1
8>9 +1
Total: +8

That's on it's own. I realize you mess with the mechanics in a lot of ways, but all of that is separate from ES.

Normally I'd agree with you.  However, look at the actual wording:

Quote from: Races of Stone
EARTH SPELL [GENERAL]
You draw magical power from the earth beneath your feet.
Prerequisites: Con 13, Wis 13, Earth Sense, Heighten Spell.
Benefit: As long as you are standing on stone or unworked earth (including normal soil), you can use the Heighten Spell feat to added effect. If you cast a spell using a spell slot one level higher than the spell’s actual level, the spell is treated as a spell of two levels higher and your effective caster level is increased by one. If you use a spell slot two levels higher, the spell is treated as three levels higher and your effective caster level is increased by two, and so on.

You cannot gain the benefi t of this feat when casting a spell with the air, fire, or water descriptor.

Emphasis mine.  It seems to me that by RAW it only applies to the slot you cast out of, not the level you heighten it to.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 27, 2012, 07:20:40 AM
2) Earth Spell is worded oddly.  If I Heighten a Silent Image to 9th (and it becomes 11th) level, but it's cast out of a 5th-level slot because of other crap, how much do I add to the CL?

1>2 +1
2>3 +1
3>4 +1
4>5 +1
5>6 +1
6>7 +1
7>8 +1
8>9 +1
Total: +8

That's on it's own. I realize you mess with the mechanics in a lot of ways, but all of that is separate from ES.

Normally I'd agree with you.  However, look at the actual wording:

Quote from: Races of Stone
EARTH SPELL [GENERAL]
You draw magical power from the earth beneath your feet.
Prerequisites: Con 13, Wis 13, Earth Sense, Heighten Spell.
Benefit: As long as you are standing on stone or unworked earth (including normal soil), you can use the Heighten Spell feat to added effect. If you cast a spell using a spell slot one level higher than the spell’s actual level, the spell is treated as a spell of two levels higher and your effective caster level is increased by one. If you use a spell slot two levels higher, the spell is treated as three levels higher and your effective caster level is increased by two, and so on.

You cannot gain the benefi t of this feat when casting a spell with the air, fire, or water descriptor.

Emphasis mine.  It seems to me that by RAW it only applies to the slot you cast out of, not the level you heighten it to.

You seem to be right. That'd reduce the CL somewhat.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 27, 2012, 09:48:22 PM
Two more fun Kalamar feats.

First is Child of the Earth, a 1st-level-only feat which lets you apply your Con bonus as a luck bonus to saves.  BOOM!

Second is Sense Danger, which is a psionic feat that lets you sense the mind of anyone who's trying to attack you within 30 feet.  Mindsight mod Detect Evil Intent, doesn't require Telepathy.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on February 28, 2012, 03:08:16 AM
Two more fun Kalamar feats.

First is Child of the Earth, a 1st-level-only feat which lets you apply your Con bonus as a luck bonus to saves.  BOOM!

Second is Sense Danger, which is a psionic feat that lets you sense the mind of anyone who's trying to attack you within 30 feet.  Mindsight mod Detect Evil Intent, doesn't require Telepathy.

Child of the Earth is pretty nice.

Sense Danger is foiled by Mind Blank. I'm pretty sure if you don't have Mind Blank on in this world, people don't even consider you important enough to attack.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 28, 2012, 06:24:28 AM
Sounds like a possible reverse psychology defensive tactic...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 28, 2012, 07:19:52 AM
Agreed on both feats -- Sense Danger is certainly not for this game ;)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 28, 2012, 10:18:39 AM
and here goes the keep.
(click to show/hide)
thus, we now have a nice little keep, which can fly 2 miles per hour, and teleport without error twice a day. There are a luxury room for every PC, 2 fancy magic laboratories that can be shared, a smithy for magic item crafting, and a nice place to live between adventures. Once my cohort will be level 15 and manage to get a CL17, he will craft Portals to our demiplanes.
We have some room to extend if needed before adding a second floor, though if we start adding a lot of people, we will need very fast a larger kitchen to feed everyone. (unless we used undead servants/soldiers, of course).


Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 28, 2012, 10:42:15 AM
Undead servants are probably out due to Sarasic. Animated objects, however...

"Be our guest!"

Also, am I reading that correctly in that there is over 2 million gp in costs beyond the landlord feat's allowance?

Also,, may wat to look its a temple space, everyone in the party worships something nonstandard, after all. Might work best as just a separate stronghold space, though, considering the varied tastes...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 28, 2012, 11:30:47 AM
the 2 million something is the cost without any reduction : what I will pay in the end is in the third column, thus only the 2k something over allowance.
As for the temples, I've put only two chapels : one dedicated to Wolverine (the unholy one) so my cohort have a nice altar to sacrifice summoned creatures for free xp ; the other is a sanctified one for more "normal" worship.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on February 28, 2012, 11:45:26 AM
Two questions:

1) Would having free shadow-TC's help reduce costs?
2) Anything else Ransom can help with?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 28, 2012, 01:03:24 PM
As a Thrall of Malconthet, getting a steady stream of "willing" sacrificial victims back to the base wont be a problem at all, no Thrallherd levels be-damned.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on February 28, 2012, 02:12:55 PM
There are no mention of other means of cost of reduction we might use right now, unless we somehow manage to get obdurium or iron for free (Wall of Iron don't count according to the guidebook. Wall of Stone with an high enough CL gives free hewn stone walls, but Wall of Iron don't, as you can't shape it).

I will need your help later, though, to install spell traps, spells turrets, portals and whatever.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 28, 2012, 02:16:30 PM
Wall of salt equals infinite gp.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 28, 2012, 04:40:44 PM
If I understand the wish economy correctly, Wall of Salt will get you infinite turnips. It might get you castle components, but not expensive magical ones. Nom might be able to help with portal crafting though.
















Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 28, 2012, 05:09:33 PM
Since the walls aren't made of Riverine, all we need are "turnips". Landlord can cover the rest.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 28, 2012, 07:25:50 PM
I came across what may be a nice unnamed type stat enhancement spell, Transfusion (Dr339 p.78). Its a little odd in that the duration is listed as "Instantaneous and 10min/level" in the header but the text mentions the bonus as lasting 1 min/level. So AyeGill, which takes precedence and, if reach spell is applied, is it persistible?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 28, 2012, 10:06:41 PM
I believe that was reprinted in one of the fiendish codices (1?)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on February 29, 2012, 12:17:47 AM
It doesn't appear to be in either. Maybe in something else vaguely similar? It only shows up in Dragon on IMarvinTPA's database, though.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 29, 2012, 02:56:05 AM
I believe it had a name adjustment. I'll have to look into it and see, became I've seen it before, and it wasn't in a dragon magazine.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on February 29, 2012, 06:02:36 PM
There are no mention of other means of cost of reduction we might use right now, unless we somehow manage to get obdurium or iron for free (Wall of Iron don't count according to the guidebook. Wall of Stone with an high enough CL gives free hewn stone walls, but Wall of Iron don't, as you can't shape it).

I will need your help later, though, to install spell traps, spells turrets, portals and whatever.

Most stronghold components are <25,000gp in value. Ransom has free TC, and has asked about using it.

In a game I'd played a long time ago, when wish-chains were still new to me, I used a wish-chain to make an immense library. One wish makes a library space, another makes a +6 book lot. I did this for each of the knowledge's and Spellcraft. I forget what I used to get the librarian, but it wasn't alive (and didn't require a paycheck).

I believe that was reprinted in one of the fiendish codices (1?)

Transfusion wasn't reprinted. It isn't renamed. If you read the thread for ability score bonuses, you'll not see anything else like it in it's place.
I believe what you may be thinking of is EG. Read my sig.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on February 29, 2012, 08:15:27 PM
I believe you may be correct.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 01, 2012, 04:21:18 PM
This looks fun.
Mind if I join?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 01, 2012, 04:23:19 PM
Aye, I dunno if you saw, but on the old thread Kuroimaken expressed interest as well, making a ScM to go around "PAWNCHING THINGS".
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 02, 2012, 04:25:25 PM
I was thinking of playing a skillmonkey.
Maybe Factotum/something psionic for classes.
Also I thought to be true mind switched into a Planetar.
See, the spells entry doesn't specify whether it's ex, su or sp, so it defaults to natural, and I get spellcasting as a 17th-level cleric (I think).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 02, 2012, 04:31:32 PM
I was thinking of playing a skillmonkey.
Maybe Factotum/something psionic for classes.
Also I thought to be true mind switched into a Planetar.
See, the spells entry doesn't specify whether it's ex, su or sp, so it defaults to natural, and I get spellcasting as a 17th-level cleric (I think).

There have been a number of arguments about that, a lot of them have spellcasting as an (Ex) ability.

If you want to be a skill monkey, you could always go with my Necro Bard build with the unlimited undead cohorts.  :D

http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=3718.msg49040#msg49040
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 02, 2012, 06:01:15 PM
Cool build, but I don't think I have the book with dirgesinger in it, and wasn't intending to be a necromancer.
If true mind switch doesn't get me spellcasting, I might use it on an avoral, phthisic or horned devil, so I can use all 32 points on mental abilities.
Plus, they all have some useful Ex abilities.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 02, 2012, 06:15:10 PM
There's certainly space enough for another guy.

Welcome aboard.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 03, 2012, 01:50:10 PM
Questions.

1) Is it valid to use Energy Substitution on a force effect, to make the damage a particular energy type?
2) Same question, but for Elven Spell Lore (which is worded differently)?
3) If both of the above are "no", would it be possible to enchant individual caltrops to do 1 point each of energy damage, and then roll around on them?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 04, 2012, 01:02:38 AM
Also I thought to be true mind switched into a Planetar.
See, the spells entry doesn't specify whether it's ex, su or sp, so it defaults to natural, and I get spellcasting as a 17th-level cleric (I think).

Racial Spellcasting is (Ex) SQ.

The process of elimination argument for it being (Ex).
Re-emphasised with it being typed as such in MM5.
For SQ instead of SA: MM5 has the abilities listed as SQ, with only the spells themselves as SA.

This would mean that: A) Polymorph doesn't grant it; B) Shapechange does; C) TMS doesn't; D) Hagu and other shape-shifters can pick it up.

Ayegill, Ruling?

I was thinking of playing a skillmonkey.
Maybe Factotum/something psionic for classes.

Sir P. had a good suggestion. But I say we need more Nanobots (http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75882/19870890/Updated_Nanobots_Conquer_D38;D_(AC,_Attack,_and_Skill_Records)).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 04, 2012, 05:12:12 AM
Also I thought to be true mind switched into a Planetar.
See, the spells entry doesn't specify whether it's ex, su or sp, so it defaults to natural, and I get spellcasting as a 17th-level cleric (I think).

Racial Spellcasting is (Ex) SQ.

The process of elimination argument for it being (Ex).
Re-emphasised with it being typed as such in MM5.
For SQ instead of SA: MM5 has the abilities listed as SQ, with only the spells themselves as SA.

This would mean that: A) Polymorph doesn't grant it; B) Shapechange does; C) TMS doesn't; D) Hagu and other shape-shifters can pick it up.

Ayegill, Ruling?

It's (Ex).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 04, 2012, 02:43:56 PM
I keep my own (ex) abilities, right?
What about my racial ones?
The power description does not seem to say whether I can keep either.

Ayegill, how much refluffing are you okay with?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 04, 2012, 07:00:24 PM
SRD says mind switch grants (ex) abilities.
The questions from the previous post still stand, though.
I think I will use nanobots, thanks for the suggestion, ariasderros.
I have a bit of a character concept now, though it's not finished.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 06, 2012, 02:16:33 AM
I keep my own (ex) abilities, right?
What about my racial ones?
The power description does not seem to say whether I can keep either.

Ayegill, how much refluffing are you okay with?

A lot of refluffing. What are you thinking of?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 13, 2012, 08:56:35 AM
Harald, there has to be a way we can use Rune Circles to our advantage in the stronghold.  What can we come up with?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on March 13, 2012, 10:05:11 AM
I'm sure we can use this... A Rune Circle enhancing our magic items crafting operations ? One in the Barbicane to enhance our guards ?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 13, 2012, 10:14:26 AM
How about one that persists spells, for daily buffs?  Or boosts caster level, also for daily buffs?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 13, 2012, 04:13:18 PM
SirPercival, is it okay if my backstory overlaps with yours a bit?
Specifically, the character I am making might have been with the tribe of Eneko(that became the Nihil) when Ransom found them.

Also, has anybody got a way to permanency about 50 castings of animate objects on my nanobots?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 13, 2012, 05:16:17 PM
SirPercival, is it okay if my backstory overlaps with yours a bit?
Specifically, the character I am making might have been with the tribe of Eneko(that became the Nihil) when Ransom found them.

Also, has anybody got a way to permanency about 50 castings of animate objects on my nanobots?

Sure, that makes it easy.  And: shadow miracle.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 14, 2012, 02:54:23 AM
SirPercival, is it okay if my backstory overlaps with yours a bit?
Specifically, the character I am making might have been with the tribe of Eneko(that became the Nihil) when Ransom found them.

Also, has anybody got a way to permanency about 50 castings of animate objects on my nanobots?

Sure, that makes it easy.  And: shadow miracle.

Shadow Miracle. Is there any problem it can't solve?
Oh, yes: The DM is actively trying to kill you. But beyond that, you're pretty covered.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 14, 2012, 07:56:38 AM
Oh come on, Aye -- you know you're not supposed to take that kind of oppositional stance against the players... ;)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 14, 2012, 11:15:09 AM
Oh come on, Aye -- you know you're not supposed to take that kind of oppositional stance against the players... ;)
I was going to look for some sort of don't minmax your characters too much paragraph in the books that I could quote for this argument, but I'm pretty sure such doesn't exist.

Anyway, by rule zero, I declare rule zero void for this purpose.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 14, 2012, 12:34:02 PM
My understanding of rule zero is "that doesn't exist in my campaign anymore / at all" or "that doesn't work that way, because I'm saying so".

Also, I kind of figured this was going to be more of a case in point of the fact that your can't fully optimize the a character w/o shooting yourself in the foot. Or to put it another way, I thought that you weren't going to have to target us, as we'd be doing crap to get ourselves targeted.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 14, 2012, 12:46:46 PM
My understanding of rule zero is "that doesn't exist in my campaign anymore / at all" or "that doesn't work that way, because I'm saying so".

Also, I kind of figured this was going to be more of a case in point of the fact that your can't fully optimize the a character w/o shooting yourself in the foot. Or to put it another way, I thought that you weren't going to have to target us, as we'd be doing crap to get ourselves targeted.

Of course, but the local superpowers can hardly target you without my consent.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on March 14, 2012, 05:57:30 PM
Personally I'm part of the ' vast and unreasonable power used with discretion' camp .
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 14, 2012, 08:56:17 PM
Questions.

1) Is it valid to use Energy Substitution on a force effect, to make the damage a particular energy type?
2) Same question, but for Elven Spell Lore (which is worded differently)?
3) If both of the above are "no", would it be possible to enchant individual caltrops to do 1 point each of energy damage, and then roll around on them?

Bump.

Also, Aye, is there anything you need help with for the world?

I'm reworking Ransom's stuff to take into account his reduced CL.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 15, 2012, 05:10:43 AM
Questions.

1) Is it valid to use Energy Substitution on a force effect, to make the damage a particular energy type?
2) Same question, but for Elven Spell Lore (which is worded differently)?
3) If both of the above are "no", would it be possible to enchant individual caltrops to do 1 point each of energy damage, and then roll around on them?

Bump.

Also, Aye, is there anything you need help with for the world?

I'm reworking Ransom's stuff to take into account his reduced CL.

I'd say yes to #1 and #2
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 15, 2012, 06:08:56 AM
Another question.  Does Master Spellthief make Theurgic Specialist obsolete?

EDIT: ...and another.  Could a shadow miracle be used to change one's type?  This would be a la the Wish entry under major rituals in Sav Spec.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 17, 2012, 06:57:48 AM
Another question.  Does Master Spellthief make Theurgic Specialist obsolete?

EDIT: ...and another.  Could a shadow miracle be used to change one's type?  This would be a la the Wish entry under major rituals in Sav Spec.

#1: should think so, although you lose a spellcasting level from the necessary Spellthief dip.
#2: Yes

Also, Aye, is there anything you need help with for the world?

I'm reworking Ransom's stuff to take into account his reduced CL.

Nothing in particular. I've just been really busy these past weeks(and no rest in sight), so help with anything would be appreciated, really.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on March 17, 2012, 08:37:46 AM
Same with the busyness. Between classes and being in the middle of the 8 week debacle that is dealing with Spring Break for everyone else at Daytona, plus the NASCAR and motorcycle events, I haven't had any time at all to work on character stuff. I've got some free time coming up soon, though.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 19, 2012, 09:07:11 PM
Ayegill, should I send you my WIP character sheet and backstory, or just post it(It's rather long)?


Also, Aye, is there anything you need help with for the world?

I'm reworking Ransom's stuff to take into account his reduced CL.

Nothing in particular. I've just been really busy these past weeks(and no rest in sight), so help with anything would be appreciated, really.
I am not sure what needs doing, but I am not too busy currently.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 20, 2012, 02:58:18 AM
Ayegill, should I send you my WIP character sheet and backstory, or just post it(It's rather long)?


Also, Aye, is there anything you need help with for the world?

I'm reworking Ransom's stuff to take into account his reduced CL.

Nothing in particular. I've just been really busy these past weeks(and no rest in sight), so help with anything would be appreciated, really.
I am not sure what needs doing, but I am not too busy currently.

Just post it in the thread. Wrap the various segments in spoiler tags.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 20, 2012, 08:44:16 PM
Posted it.

The second level of cleric actually seems like a bad idea though...
Maybe mystic theurge. Does factotum work as the arcane spellcasting class?
Could I qualify as foluchan lyrist using cloistered cleric lore as bardic knowledge?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on March 23, 2012, 10:06:01 PM
Can I get anti-feats for the personality copied via Nom's Assume Identity SQ (which is itself from eating an Ethereal Doppelganger). I understand if the answer is no, but decided it was worth asking in order to squeeze in a judicious amount of physical combat feats instead of relying almost solely on casting. Gish-y goodness yum!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 24, 2012, 08:31:26 AM
Can I get anti-feats for the personality copied via Nom's Assume Identity SQ (which is itself from eating an Ethereal Doppelganger). I understand if the answer is no, but decided it was worth asking in order to squeeze in a judicious amount of physical combat feats instead of relying almost solely on casting. Gish-y goodness yum!
Nope
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 24, 2012, 08:34:56 AM
All you need for combat feats is Mirror Move.  Put it in a continuous item to have them all the time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on March 24, 2012, 03:43:08 PM
I'd never come across that spell before. That's awesome, thanks!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 27, 2012, 04:45:31 PM
Good afternoon all.

Posting to say hello, and to throw out a concept. Simple and direct:

Warlord with army of the undead.

I'm having a little assistance already in building the character, and my primary concern is the flavor of the character rather then the ability to fire continent-devouring eye-lasers as a free action. Once the build nears completion I'll post more stuff.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 27, 2012, 05:19:04 PM
Good afternoon all.

Posting to say hello, and to throw out a concept. Simple and direct:

Warlord with army of the undead.

I'm having a little assistance already in building the character, and my primary concern is the flavor of the character rather then the ability to fire continent-devouring eye-lasers as a free action. Once the build nears completion I'll post more stuff.

Welcome, my friend!

I think Ransom has you covered there.  Aye, will you check my math here?  I think Ransom is the Bowling Ball Gatling Gun of DOOM...

Any of that seem off to you?  Of course with Suffer the Flesh shenanigans the number would be larger.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 27, 2012, 05:20:06 PM
Welcome, my friend!

I think Ransom has you covered there.  Aye, will you check my math here?  I think Ransom is the Bowling Ball Gatling Gun of DOOM...
  • Ransom can use RoS TK to toss 96 weapons.  Let's have them be orcish shotputs (base damage 2d6,19-20/x3).
  • He then uses Reach and Chain on a Greater Mighty Wallop, targeting all the shotputs, for 24 size category increases.
  • It seems from the size to damage progression from the SRD (http://www.d20srd.org/srd/equipment/weapons.htm#weaponSize) that every 2 increases doubles the damage die size.  Thus, we would have 2d6 x 212 = 8192d6 each.
  • If all of them hit, it would be 96 x 8192d6 = 786432d6 damage.

Any of that seem off to you?  Of course with Suffer the Flesh shenanigans the number would be larger.

... You just shit my pants.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 27, 2012, 05:23:42 PM
^ The 3.5 damage record uses up arrow notation! :o
This is small comparatively.

^^ How do you roll that?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 27, 2012, 05:31:26 PM
^ The 3.5 damage record uses up arrow notation! :o
This is small comparatively.

^^ How do you roll that?

If you want to simulate rolling I'd recommend Excel. Otherwise, I'd feel comfortable assuming the average roll. Just multiply 786432 by 3.5. Which averages to about 2,752,512 damage, or roughly enough to kill every monster in the Epic Level Handbook at least once.




Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 27, 2012, 05:39:58 PM
It would actually be both more and less.  I can Chain an RoS Greater Magic Weapon to get a +23 to attack and damage to each one, and also they have a large crit range and I can Reach+Chain Dolorous Blow so it becomes 17-20/x3 and auto-confirms.

However, even with the +23 to hit and a Divine Power, I'm still only at +50 or so to hit, which may not do so well.  At least 5% of them will hit, and will confirm.  So, I'm at 5% success which gives ~5 hits, each of which does (8192d6 + 23) x3 = 172170 average damage.  Not bad... and if +50 gets past AC then I'm much higher.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 27, 2012, 05:48:01 PM
It would actually be both more and less.  I can Chain an RoS Greater Magic Weapon ...

Possible things RoS could stand for:

Ritual of Stone
Rine of Sight (Thanks Scooby!)
Rules of Soccer
Remuneration of Sages
Recompense of Service
Rash of Sumac

:)


Oh, and if it's both more and less, then it's called "Average", or perhaps that's just "Mean" :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 27, 2012, 05:54:19 PM
Reserves of Strength. (http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=3519.0)  :D
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 27, 2012, 05:56:19 PM
I swear between this board and the other board I'm on I've learned more possible combinations for letters of the alphabet then that time Godzilla attacked the alphabet soup cannery. :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 27, 2012, 06:16:02 PM
Oh crap, I forgot Algid Enchantment.  So he's actually at +85 to hit.  That should do better.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 27, 2012, 06:30:30 PM
I swear between this board and the other board I'm on I've learned more possible combinations for letters of the alphabet then that time Godzilla attacked the alphabet soup cannery. :)
Godzilla attacked the alphabet soup cannery!

There are 17576 three-letter combinations possible, incidentally.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 07:27:37 AM
Oh god... I was telling my brother about Ransom, and he said "you have to build him at level 30 for thus and such game".  What would he even be like at level 30??   :twitch
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 07:58:13 AM
Oh god... I was telling my brother about Ransom, and he said "you have to build him at level 30 for thus and such game".  What would he even be like at level 30??   :twitch

More ridiculous? :)

Maybe he got bored of owning a Demiplane, and used all his infinite resources to buy up all the real estate on the Prime Material Plane, using a portal to the Quasi-Elemental Plane of Mineral to finance his en-devour. Now all the kingdoms of Man, Elf, and Dwarf pay him rent. "Peace" becomes synonymous with "Rent Control".
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 09:47:16 AM
I mean, I could trivially get him to an arbitrarily high CL (seriously, getting to a CL of 1 million would take probably about 5 minutes and it would last until dispelled... that is, forever), plus with Heroics + DCFS he has as many feats (and with Improved Spell Capacity, spell slots and spell levels) as he wants.  So I'm not sure what to do with that...

EDIT: did the math wrong, it would take 12 rounds to get to a CL of 1e6.

EDIT2: No, I did it right the first time, but it only takes 22 rounds.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 10:14:58 AM
I mean, I could trivially get him to an arbitrarily high CL (seriously, getting to a CL of 1 million would take probably about 5 minutes and it would last until dispelled... that is, forever), plus with Heroics + DCFS he has as many feats (and with Improved Spell Capacity, spell slots and spell levels) as he wants.  So I'm not sure what to do with that...

EDIT: did the math wrong, it would take 12 rounds to get to a CL of 1e6.

- Simple. Retrain ninth level and take the Landlord feat. Landlord gives you 1 gold for every 1 gold you put towards the construction of a base of operations, with no ceiling. Give the feat a million gold, and it gives you an additional million, but only for the purposes of constructing a base. So what do to you with this? Buy the Prime Material Plane. I'm serious. :)

- Though alternatively you could construct an army of Adamantine Golems, or use your insane magical prowess to create a new element that has the hardness of Adamantine and the suppleness of Mithril, then build a few (hundred) golems from that material. Oh, did I mention it's naturally invisible?

Nothing Golems, anyone? :)

- Let's combine the two. Construct a mobile fortress from Nothingite (Patent Pending), and then enchant it to be a golem the size of a mobile castle. Now you have a colossal golem that doubles as living space.

- Make duplicates of yourself, loyal to the original of course, and then start doing insane cooperative ritual magics to find your long lost childhood friend.

- Take a lesson from the villain of the anime series Wakfu (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wakfu), Nox (http://villains.wikia.com/wiki/Nox), and go back in time to the point where she died, and then save her life. Since D&D's concept of Paradox is "N/A", then you could return to a new future where she lived, and you and her can be happy / rule the cosmos together.

- Using your insanely high CL, use a massive Polymorph Any Object to turn the Prime Material Plane into and endless quagmire of salt water taffy, and offer it up as a tribute to the Goddess of Cavities and Dental Misfortune.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 10:26:22 AM
 :lmao

I meant more along the lines of "what CL should I give him?"

Though I do like the PAO idea.  Let's see... PAO can do 100 cubic feet per level, Widen that to 200 ft3/level.  The moon is 7.75439452e20 feet3, so I'd need a CL of 3.87719726e18.  With this method, I would need about 10 minutes to reach that CL.

So... 10 minutes, and I can turn the moon into the Death Star.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 10:34:43 AM
No, what you meant was "What the hell do I do what a character that powerful?" not "What Caster Level should I limit myself to?"

Don't say things you can't take back. ;)


Okay, so you can turn the PMP into the Elemental Plane of Taffy in about half an hour, and the funny part is since the transition from "Earth and Stone" to "Salt Water Taffy" is so minimal, the change would be permanent since the spell is more concerned with you turning dust mites into dinosaurs then doing anything truly creative, like turning the sun into a ball of yarn or turning the king's moat from water to hydrofluoric acid.

And then, once you have your Death Star, you can spend ten minutes crafting every wand and rod in existence, sovereign gluing them together, and mounting them on a metamagic extend stage and then start picking off populace centers from high orbit. Gonna suck to be the PC's in that universe.

"All was bright and sunny in the world, then a beam of finite chaos came crashing from the heavens, dealing 10d6 fire / acid / puppy / electrical / sonic / holy / unholy / orangutang / untyped / negative / positive energy damage to all within a 15 / 25 / 50 / 100 foot radius. Save for half, for most of the damage." 
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 10:43:32 AM
Nah, I'll just energy sub it all to Puppy damage, since who would complain at being pelted to death with adorable puppies?

BTW, with a 3e18 CL, I can throw 3e18 orcish shotputs, each of which does 2d6 * 23.75e17 base damage.

EDIT: And I already know what to do with a character that powerful -- play him in that game.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 10:45:04 AM
Nah, I'll just energy sub it all to Puppy damage, since who would complain at being pelted to death with adorable puppies?

And no one has Puppy Resistance.

Quote
BTW, with a 3e18 CL, I can throw 3e18 orcish shotputs, each of which does 2d6 * 23.75e17 base damage.

EDIT: And I already know what to do with a character that powerful -- play him in that game.


So... this:

(http://o.aolcdn.com/photo-hub/news_gallery/7/0/705168/1297353457210.JPEG)

... but in the billions.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 10:48:57 AM
Billions?  Bah.  The base damage of each of those shotputs can't even be represented in scientific notation.  Here's a more accurate version, according to Wolfram Alpha:

1010101.232
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 10:51:55 AM
Billions?  Bah.  The base damage of each of those shotputs can't even be represented in scientific notation.  Here's a more accurate version, according to Wolfram Alpha:

1010101.232

(http://twilight.ponychan.net/chan/vinyl/src/132971088991.jpg)
GREAT SCOTT!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 11:14:22 AM
By the way, I'm NOT going to use this method of gaining arbitrarily high CL in this game.  For one, I can't do it justice until at least 18th level and then not for realsies until 21st (when I can make it last forever).  For two, I don't want Aye to use it against us.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 11:17:05 AM
It's reassuring to know that the real reason we're not doing half the insane shit we can attempt to justify is because we don't want to potentially risk facing it ourselves. ;)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on March 28, 2012, 02:14:58 PM
I am tempted to make it a Wight Christmas started via nuclear fimbulwinter, though...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 02:18:15 PM
I'm.... leery... of a wight.... christmas

Sing it with me now.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 02:41:59 PM
Sable, I figured out an even better use for a 4 quintillion CL.

a) use Shadow Miracle to cast Body Outside Body, which gives me .2 quintillion copies of myself.
b) use Spell Sculptor to cast a 12th-level RoS Shapechange on 1 target per level, turning all .2 quintillion copies into Advanced 4 quintillion HD force dragons.
c) take over the entire multiverse, all at once.
d)  :???
e) profit!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on March 28, 2012, 03:31:45 PM
(http://static.fjcdn.com/comments/Mother+of+god+_0e29a0446d96d138e7f1b06aa63261cf.jpg)

Sirpercival, I do think you have created a real TO monster. good job !
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 03:33:04 PM
Or...

Create a demiplane so large and vast that the Prime Material Plane is just a pocket dimension of it. Then keep the PMP in a jar on your desk.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 28, 2012, 03:35:45 PM
Sirpercival, I do think you have created a real TO monster. good job !

Thank you!  As I said, I won't be using this tactic in this game, though it does require a few things from this game that I would probably never get anywhere else (the Epic rules, such shadowcraft shenaniganery, and the item of command word Lucubration).  If you guys are interested, I can post the details here provided Aye promises not to use them against us ;)

Or...

Create a demiplane so large and vast that the Prime Material Plane is just a pocket dimension of it. Then keep the PMP in a jar on your desk.

Meh, that takes too long.  The size of a demiplane isn't level-based.  Might as well conquer the ones that already exist.  ;)

EDIT: Though, with arbitrarily high spell slots, I could create huge huge demiplanes with Spell Sculptor + Genesis.  But it would still take WAY too long.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 03:38:22 PM
Okay. How's this sound for a bit of background flavor:
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 28, 2012, 03:53:04 PM
Interesting. Is she evil, or is it just Ebonblade preventing her from reacting how she normally would?

How do you intend to build the character?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on March 28, 2012, 03:56:49 PM
Or...

Create a demiplane so large and vast that the Prime Material Plane is just a pocket dimension of it. Then keep the PMP in a jar on your desk.
The prime material is infinite.
Also, sable, here's your antifeat rolls:
1d1000=85, 1d1000=362, 1d1000=437, 1d1000=352, 1d1000=237, 1d1000=372, 1d1000=548, 1d1000=523, 1d1000=5, 1d1000=486, 1d1000=493, 1d1000=501, 1d1000=705, 1d1000=880, 1d1000=694, 1d1000=900, 1d1000=74, 1d1000=40, 1d1000=53, 1d1000=523 (http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/3436775/)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 03:57:06 PM
It's your standard tale of Girl meets Inanimate Object. Her first act of evil leads her down a road of warlordly despotism (Lawful Evil) with a little help from Ebonblade.

I intend to build her in 3.5 Dungeons and Dragons.

Aye: Thanks. I'll reference these and get to work. Also, incoming PM!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 28, 2012, 04:05:51 PM
I intend to build her in 3.5 Dungeons and Dragons.
I meant what classes, race, that sort of thing.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 04:20:17 PM
She's going to be human, and I'm thinking Lower class, maybe even peasant or serf.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 28, 2012, 04:29:52 PM
She's going to be human, and I'm thinking Lower class, maybe even peasant or serf.
I refered to character class (http://www.d20srd.org/indexes/classes.htm).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 28, 2012, 04:31:14 PM
Didn't you read her backstory? She's got tons of character...

Okay, I can literally do this all day, so in light of that, I'm thinking the following:

Commoner 1 / Kensai (Fighter Variant) 6 / Disciple of Dispater 8
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 28, 2012, 09:34:26 PM
Okay, I can literally do this all day, so in light of that, I'm thinking the following:
Yay, literalness! Would you like a kudo for it? Is that the correct singular?

Commoner 1 / Kensai (Fighter Variant) 6 / Disciple of Dispater 8
Commoner? In a game this overpowered?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 29, 2012, 09:31:52 AM
Okay, I can literally do this all day, so in light of that, I'm thinking the following:
Yay, literalness! Would you like a kudo for it? Is that the correct singular?

I think Kudos is both singular and plural. Like Ninja or Volkswagon. I'll take any kudos I can get, as long as they were earned :)

Oh, and thanks for the link to the character classes. I never knew Dungeons and Dragons was such a caste based society.

Quote
Commoner 1 / Kensai (Fighter Variant) 6 / Disciple of Dispater 8
Commoner? In a game this overpowered?

Absolutely. Sure, this is an insanely overpowered game where people can roll listen checks to deal damage to people that speak their names, but that doesn't mean that I can abandon all sense of decency. She started off as a farm girl, so she's earned that level of commoner. Not a single one of you nigh omnipotent jerks has ever tilled a field or milked a cow or tried to snatch the eggs out from under chickens, so when you're all starving on the field of battle and there's pigs to slaughter, eggs to harvest, and cows to milk, you'll all look to me with hunger in your bellies and sorrow in your hearts. Yes I took a level in commoner, and I'm damned proud of it. :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 29, 2012, 09:42:11 AM
Plus, she can take Commoner flaws.  Chicken Infested!  Delicious!  Incomprehensible Accent!  XP Farm!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on March 29, 2012, 12:38:35 PM
Not entirely true, i've done all those things, just with undead cows, chicken, and fields :P
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 29, 2012, 12:40:52 PM
....

Undead Popcorn!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 30, 2012, 02:17:50 PM
Ummm.... you're limiting yourself on the TK damage by the way.


(click to show/hide)

This is only one reason why I'm sure everything in the world either has HP damage immunity, or isn't alive. Delay Death + Beastland Ferocity is one combo I am sure will be used by every single NPC.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 30, 2012, 02:20:20 PM
... Everything Ariasderros said...

I think my brain just shot itself.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 30, 2012, 02:25:50 PM
I was leaving out the Shrink Item thing because technically those are improvised weapons and can break, leaving you with just some rock.  And solid rocks that big aren't easy to find.

Dart's a good idea, but you did your math wrong -- 13 + 24 isn't 27.  After GMW, that's Colossal 37+ size.  You left out 10 powers of 2.

That's 4294967296d6.  Just saying.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 30, 2012, 02:38:38 PM
... Everything Ariasderros said...

I think my brain just shot itself.
With a colossal 37+ dart.

(I've actually used the Dart of Badasseries in a game w/o GMW and RoS. Which, still, with 15x 256d6 damage, is totally OP.
It was only used because the players had decided that the DM needed taken out of the group, and they wanted me to end the campaign. In the most insane way possible.
So I'd used the Deck of Many Things (we already had it, I just hadn't used it) + a Handy Haversack to hit level... 316? IIRC.
Then used DCFS + Heroics, to be what I call "the 9th path to pun-pun", as with this, at epic levels, you can have whatever stats you want. Level 316 is Epic.
Then I'd used Contact Other Plane as my Dial-a-God service to auto find every BBEG in the game.
Then Darted them to death.
DM tried to counter on the last BBEG. I was level 316. Every full-caster. Every Theurge. Etc.
There is no counter for that.)

@ Sir. P, oops. :)
And your math is wrong too. My spreadsheet says that 37+ would deal 1,048,576d6, not 4,294,967,296d6. You went 2 to far.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 30, 2012, 02:42:55 PM
Crap, it doesn't work.  Darts aren't bludgeoning.

We need to find a high damage-to-weight ratio bludgeoning weapon.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 30, 2012, 02:57:29 PM
Crap, it doesn't work.  Darts aren't bludgeoning.

We need to find a high damage-to-weight ratio bludgeoning weapon.

Sling bullets = Dart. Same d4 for a 1/2lb base at medium size.

You're not enchanting them, so it doesn't matter if 1/2 of them break. Since it'll just be round 1, True Create massive bullet. Round 2, shrink bullet. Round 3-30, repeat steps 1&2. Permanence is one round per bullet if desired. Double rounds for spell replenishment. Maximum time to make 15 Bullets of Badasseries (w/ Permanence and spell replenishment): 3 Minutes.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on March 30, 2012, 04:08:31 PM
So I'd used the Deck of Many Things (we already had it, I just hadn't used it) + a Handy Haversack to hit level... 316? IIRC.
Then used DCFS + Heroics, to be what I call "the 9th path to pun-pun", as with this, at epic levels, you can have whatever stats you want. Level 316 is Epic.
How did you use the deck reliably?
What is DCFS + Heroics?

EDIT: where'd I get a recognition?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on March 30, 2012, 04:10:10 PM
Haversack gives you the card you want :)

And Dark Chaos Feat Shuffle on the feat granted to you by Heroics.

EDIT: Probably for the homebrew game setting stuff.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 30, 2012, 06:32:58 PM
Haversack gives you the card you want :)

And Dark Chaos Feat Shuffle on the feat granted to you by Heroics.

EDIT: Probably for the homebrew game setting stuff.

I think "Artifact" trumps "Minor Wondrous Item", and to be honest you would be retrieving the "Deck" from your Haversack, not the "Comet Card from the Deck". Otherwise people would be beating the door down to try to get the Deck and then just declare "I'm drawing a billion cards... from my Haversack" and then just going like everyone's favorite TV show from the 80's, Joker's Wild (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA-az9YZVio)... and going "JOKER JOKER JOKER!"

Or maybe just "MOON MOON MOON!"
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on March 30, 2012, 06:45:37 PM
Technically, per RAW, that trick does work.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 30, 2012, 06:50:16 PM
Technically, per RAW, that trick does work.

Show me.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 30, 2012, 06:58:02 PM
Cause, as written, the Handy Haversack is:

"When the wearer reaches into it for a specific item, that item is always on top."

The specific item you're reaching for would be the Deck, unless you managed to get an individual card from the deck by itself. The card you are to draw is unknown until you draw it, and you always draw from the top. If you don't draw a card within an hour, the top card is automatically flipped for you, since the words "Deck" and "Dick" are pretty close to one another.

So as written, this doesn't work. Sorry.

EDIT: Though, be careful when drawing out the deck that you don't accidentally just take the top card. After all, the Deck is right on top of the haversack. It'd be a shame if you drew the wrong card from, essentially, one of the primal instruments of chaos.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on March 30, 2012, 07:32:17 PM
That's using an inaccurate definition of item, there. Any individual card is an item. If I reach in for "the card of death", then that satisfies the item's ability.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 30, 2012, 10:46:00 PM
@ Sneaky, about the Deck Spoilered due to length and off-topic.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 30, 2012, 11:22:34 PM
It's stuff like this that feels like gross deviations of the spirit of the game. I won't argue any further.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on March 31, 2012, 08:23:09 AM
And that's the key point. Rules as Intended vs Rules as Written.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 31, 2012, 10:32:43 AM
And that's the key point. Rules as Intended vs Rules as Written.

vs. Rules as Interpreted.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 31, 2012, 11:18:16 AM
It's stuff like this that feels like gross deviations of the spirit of the game. I won't argue any further.

IMO, the deck itself is that on its own.

Seriously, it is, at best, a tool for the DM to troll to a greater extent than any DM should (and I'm a DM that does like his trolling).
At worst, it is one of the quickest ways to imbalance the party so severely that people are guaranteed to get frustrated.
It is, on its own, the source of many, many, horrid gaming stories.
My opinion of any DM who puts it into their world in the first place drops by many notches. So the fact that there are many ways to abuse its mechanics should be a moot point anyway. Because the item is absolutely game-breaking with abuse, and just feels like it broke the games fun without abuse.

I'd say "no offence if you've used it". But, ummm... I really hate that items existence.
And yes, that did play a small part in what led to us all deciding that DM was a bad DM. The main reasons for us quitting his game in as dick move of a fashion as possible was because of a LOT of non-game-related stuff that he let affect his games though, more than anything in-character.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on March 31, 2012, 11:30:10 AM
Oh, it's a vicious item, which is why it was probably moved from "Magical Items" to "Minor Artifacts" from 2nd edition to 3rd edition. There are as many horror stories about it as there are blades of grass in my front lawn, but for every billion "And then my character exploded" stories, there is that one "I survived the Deck of Many Things".

The Players Handbook II had an interesting spin on a variant DoMT, but it was just too insane. Retrain a level as Cleric. Take a monk level and cry about it. Gain two points of this. Gain a feat, get a that, lose everything, change gender, become a mermaid, then turn into salt and die.

I'm kidding about a few of them. I'll let you all guess which ones.

And hey, no offense taken. I put the Deck of Many Fates (My variant of the DoMT, slightly less insane) in my campaign universe as a draw to players. They seek it out, they know the risks, and they draw. If it blows up their character, I've essentially signed my waiver of "Hey, you went through twelve game sessions following legend and rumor to find it. If you become a lycanthropic vampire pygmy quadriplegic, it's on you."

I also tend to Monty Hall, so if people want to seek out the Deck because they want MORE power, MORE wealth, and MORE stuff, well then they know the risks.

And on a more on topic note, the build is continuing. Had a bit of a rough day on Thursday, and took a mental health day on Friday, so we'll see how much we can get accomplished today.

If the GM's ready and everyone else is built, you can all begin, and I can be introduced slightly later on if that's convenient for everyone.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on March 31, 2012, 12:02:26 PM
And on a more on topic note, the build is continuing. Had a bit of a rough day on Thursday, and took a mental health day on Friday, so we'll see how much we can get accomplished today.

If the GM's ready and everyone else is built, you can all begin, and I can be introduced slightly later on if that's convenient for everyone.

(click to show/hide)

Quill, Myself, and HoV all have Work In Progress tags throughout our Char. sheets, and McPoyo has a "what needs done" line in his (hers?, don't like to assume). And the DM is busy and trying to do stuff too, so I think you're good for now.

I myself just actually need to run some stuff by Aye, which I could do sometime this week, spend my money, which I could do in an hour or less after I run stuff by Aye. And do my feats and their progression. Which feels like it would take a full workday to do. Seriously. I went way past feat happy, but I will use them, just need to order them logically.

Oh, and write up my leadership stuff, like my "brother". But that should all go quickly, as I know what I want to do, and just need to do it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: HeadofVecna on March 31, 2012, 03:06:54 PM
I've been somewhat stalled on finishing Nom. I have more done than is posted. And if Aye announces a deadline I certainly plan to meet it. But if the game experiences failure to launch, I'd rather play Mass Effect 3  :joystick
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on March 31, 2012, 03:20:51 PM
I'm a he.

I also have more done than is posted, but I'm in the middle of getting hammered by work right now, so haven't had a chance to post it.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on April 09, 2012, 06:50:46 PM
Unfortunately, due to previously mentioned work hammering, I may need to drop out of this game. If the only thing keeping this from starting is me, go ahead and start and I'll join in if there's an opening in the future.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on April 10, 2012, 01:28:32 AM
Well, I'll admit I'm not complete sure who's done with what, but a couple of the character sheets still have WIP tags on them, and due in part to aforementioned busyness, and in part to a moderate creative block, I've got a huge amount of shit to get done before I'm comfortable starting the campaign.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 10, 2012, 09:44:04 AM
I think we all got hit by a nasty case of the "BUSY WORK" bug. I've made little to no progress on my commoner turned warlord, mostly because it's been busy as hell here, and also because I want to double check everything to make sure that not only does it all make sense seamlessly, but that it also all adds up and such. Sure we're game breaking douchebags, but I want to be a "legit by math" douchebag.

I'll post what I have when I can get the time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 11, 2012, 04:00:03 PM
As an update, the character equipment lists are 99.9% complete. Little things like calculations of saving throws, hit points, armor class, to hit bonuses, and such... should be done by the end of this week Dispater willing.

Which means, for the most part, the characters are done.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 16, 2012, 11:46:28 AM
Re-Update:

Candace and the Ebonblade are done. This week has been hell, so if I missed anything please let me know.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on April 16, 2012, 01:48:50 PM
i'm sure we can do something with your wish list.  :smirk
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 16, 2012, 01:54:59 PM
I'm sure a pegasus with the Shadow Creature template and some Arcane Blood feats would work out nicely. She'd answer to Nightmare Moon, and we'd conquer the world together...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on April 16, 2012, 03:04:12 PM
I was more thinking of a mage-breed symbiotic poney of doom, but that works too. Even better : a mage-breed symbiotic pink unicorn raised on Nowhere,  thus a pink invisible unicorn ?  :smirk
Or a unicorn effigy, running around with this song (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSMeUPFjQHc) always on. :smirk

bonus points for both at the same time.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 16, 2012, 03:41:00 PM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-VVn_HyM7K1E/TaDHTe3gwSI/AAAAAAAADRc/LhP37DR_eyE/s1600/5180+-+Nightmare_Moon+Raven-Gazer.jpg)
Now that's what I'm talking about. Black coat, sinister aura, control of darkness and shadow, a mane of the starfields. This one's not about optimized for stats, I'm taking this one for 1 billion cool points.

Edit: Okay, so she's an alicorn with a few mage levels of her own, with a symbiotic shadow elemental with a few pony levels. Satisfactory?
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on April 16, 2012, 04:09:58 PM
yees. We are nigh omnipotent assholes, being classy is a requirement. You are going this way, and it is a respectable choice, and stylish as well :
(http://drmcninja.com/comics/2009-11-04-15p65.jpg)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 16, 2012, 04:38:16 PM
I respect Dr. McNinja, so I have to say...

Until it's a motorcycle, no deal. :)


EDIT: Or as a compromise, can I get it in black? Keep the rainbow mane and horn, of course. The white clashes with the whole EBON part of the armor / sword set.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on April 16, 2012, 04:53:50 PM
EDIT: Or as a compromise, can I get it in black? Keep the rainbow mane and horn, of course. The white clashes with the whole EBON part of the armor / sword set.

Wait.... Black in colour, with a rainbow cape.
Needs bracers of throwing daggers and a wide brimmed hat.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 16, 2012, 04:57:20 PM
Gauntlet of Infinite Knifes should have most of that covered. The wide brimmed hat may be impossible, though. At least, until WotC prints the Complete Badasses Handbook.

The knives produced by the Gauntlets vanish after three rounds anyway, so you create them, then two rounds later throw them. If the enemy does the whole "I pull them out and throw them back at you" bit, you can stand and look badass as the knives cease to exist moments before they hit you. Cinematic License required :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Quillwraith on April 16, 2012, 05:08:31 PM
Wait.... Black in colour, with a rainbow cape.
Needs bracers of throwing daggers and a wide brimmed hat.
Who?

The wide brimmed hat may be impossible, though. At least, until WotC prints the Complete Badasses Handbook.
Hat of Disguise. Even if it isn't wide-brimmed, it can become wide-brimmed.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 16, 2012, 05:09:06 PM
Sarcasm, a lost art. :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on April 18, 2012, 03:50:52 PM
Sarcasm, a lost art. :)
Jarlaxle Baenre, a forgotten awesomeness.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 18, 2012, 03:56:04 PM
Sarcasm, a lost art. :)
Jarlaxle Baenre, a forgotten awesomeness.

I dunno, all of House Baenre felt kinda Mary Sue to me. No offense to the writing or anything but... House that held the greatest favor... all but personally shaping the flow of one of the most impressive Drow cities in existence... holding onto their political power longer then any other of the Houses...

I mean, that couldn't be more Mary Sue unless you painted Buckaroo Banzai black and had him and the rest of the Hong Kong Cavaliers join the House.




Hey Percival! There's a Homebrew idea for you! Prestige Class: Hong Kong Cavalier.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on April 18, 2012, 03:57:29 PM
(http://www.fybertech.com/4thread/tg_10010271/1274657327759.jpg)
I didn't remember he had bracers of throwing daggers...
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on April 18, 2012, 04:01:48 PM
Sarcasm, a lost art. :)
Jarlaxle Baenre, a forgotten awesomeness.

I dunno, all of House Baenre felt kinda Mary Sue to me. No offense to the writing or anything but... House that held the greatest favor... all but personally shaping the flow of one of the most impressive Drow cities in existence... holding onto their political power longer then any other of the Houses...

None of which really has anything to do with Mr. has-left-the-house.

He is his own badass now (when not riding Entreri's [sp?] coattails).
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 18, 2012, 04:37:13 PM
(http://www.fybertech.com/4thread/tg_10010271/1274657327759.jpg)
I didn't remember he had bracers of throwing daggers...

Infinite daggers, I might add.

And yeah, he left the house, and adventures with Drizzit, who says awesome stuff about him, and he has lots of magic items, and lots of magic power, and he's the son of Dumbledor and Snape, and he's a bald rock star in a world where everyone's haircut tells you how important they are, and he probably sails around on a giant surfboard carved to look like two swans having a kung-fu fight to the death, and...

:)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: McPoyo on April 18, 2012, 07:03:31 PM
If I had a surfboard that looked like that, I'd do the same thing.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on April 19, 2012, 05:25:26 AM
I'll keep my tamed flying alligator, thank you.  :D
(http://gifs.gifbin.com/reverse-46996058g6.gif)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: phaedrusxy on April 20, 2012, 01:51:59 PM
he probably sails around on a giant surfboard carved to look like two swans having a kung-fu fight to the death, and...
If I had a surfboard that looked like that, I'd do the same thing.
+1  :D
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: AyeGill on April 22, 2012, 05:07:29 AM
I'm sorry everybody, but with everything that's going on for me right now, I don't think I have the time I'll need to manage this. So it's on hold(if you can call it that considering it never began) until I can get my schedule cleared up a bit.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Sneaky_Sable on April 22, 2012, 11:26:41 AM
Take all the time you need man. Real life always comes first!
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: Harald on April 22, 2012, 01:28:28 PM
No trouble at all. At least, we managed to cook some awesomes character concepts, as well as some nice heavy optimisation tricks.
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: sirpercival on April 22, 2012, 01:33:37 PM
Well, it's not okay with me.  :shakefist

Just kidding.  Do what you gotta do :)
Title: Re: OOC Discussion and shit
Post by: ariasderros on May 01, 2012, 09:16:49 PM
Hey Quill, for your Nanobots, it looks like there is more op-fu in the process to use with them via teamwork benefits.
http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=4862.0 (http://www.minmaxboards.com/index.php?topic=4862.0)