1
[D&D 3.5] Souls / Re: The Nonfictional People Strike Back(OOC)
« on: August 06, 2016, 10:22:24 AM »
I get the feeling that at some point we are going to be controlling a whole lot of undead as a party.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
What pronouns should I use to refer to Necra? (’Necra’ is feminine in Greek, but ‘Librum’ is masculine in Latin, though I suppose the name wouldn’t have been a clue anyway under the circumstances.)
I apologize in advance for playing a crazy person without warning anyone.
It's mostly about standardizing the parts that are large quantities of numbers that are subtly different from each other. It would be nice to be able to tell roughly what you're getting when you talk about a dragon of age category X in terms of overall power level and pure statistics. There's still plenty of room for the basic dragon to be different and for dragon-specific features to scale up and grow more different with age, still enabling each dragon type to have its own distinct flavor and specialties.
I'm not trying to say dragons should be all the same. I'm just trying to have a sort of presentation that separates out the parts that are actually unique and doesn't try to mix them in with the things that are the same for everyone.
They explained a lot of possible side effects to me today when they were shooting steroids into the ball and socket joint of my shoulder, of which i has none.
They forgot to mention the random muscle spasms.
Well, I could impose a CL penalty on it if it's to much of a power bonus to casters. But that creates it'own problem...
As for the Int req... how about "Int, Cha, or Wis 16"... then it's equal opportunity for all casters..
Anyways how about if I add this:
"For every additional spell, past the first, cast in this way treat your Caster Level as 2 lower until the start of your next turn."
So if you only cast 1 spell using these feats you cast at your ful CL, but if you cast 2 or more you cast at -2 per spell to a maximum penalty of -6 at 4 spells?
At the beginning of your turn you may announce that you are using a spell barrage. If you do, you may cast any number of spells as free actions this turn. Increase the spell level of each spell by 2 plus an additional 2 for each spell you have previously cast this turn.
Unless I'm mistaken, a properly tweaked caster can get 8+ spells a round from this... that's insane.
you go where the money is or criticism is little to nonexistent?
I resubbed to woW tonight....
I may end up just carrying around all my wealth as black onyx gems. Being a gemstone it should be a trade good and it seems more in flavour than art.I have a thought:
Katadesmos Necra
This arcane tome discusses the theory of necromancy and the use of negative energy with a slightly disturbing degree of detail and enthusiasm, but it's author's scholarship was impeccable. It grants a bonus on knowledge checks related to its topic as a masterwork tool, and also contains detailed notes on two uncommon spells, although you aren't an arcanist yourself and have thus been unable to decipher their effects.
225 gp
- To Necra: "How would you describe the sizzle of that soul-burning engine? Is it more of a 'sizzle-pop' or a 'waagh eternalagonyandutlimatedespair'? My ears are excellent, but there's an entirely different acoustic situation for an outside observer compared to you yourself with it happening inside your own body. And be honest, this is for posterity."Think steam engine with the slightest hint of brief but unimaginable agony. Though only shortly after consuming a soul, most of the time its just a low rumble.
Human: Two legs, no wings, only have fur on your head.Deathjack: Two legs, no wings, no fur, covered in blades, green smoke.
Elf: Two legs, no wings, only have fur on your head.
Orc: Two legs, no wings, only have fur on your head.