Min/Max Boards

Hello. Been a while since i posted here

I'll get right to the point, I've been working on a bard build for the longest time now, and had so many ideas rushing through my head. That I had to divide it into 2 separate builds. I finally got both of them in a state that I'm satisfied with, but I'm not sure which one to go with.

One is a Brazen Deceiver build With a focus on Shadow magic, Dirge of Doom and is just an all around Debuffer/Shadowcaster variant.

The other is a Duettist/Sound Striker Build With an emphasis on Buffs and Sonic Magic

With both of them Utilizing Enchantment Magic and Rougish elements to varying degrees

Basically this character is an alluring thief, that only really steals and in some cases kills those who deserve it. Landing her more in the chaotic good area.

The Entrancing Shadow

The Siren

So which one of these would be better for a Standard party?
 

Hey been a while, So i've been looking into pathfinder and the path of war as well as the martial training feats and these 3 combinations caught my eye so objectively which would make more sense for a sacred fist?

Silver Crane makes the most sense thematically but broken blade and steel serpent have their perks too.

To make the most of Craft Alchemy. Or can you make good use of it without the feat?

I just wanted to ask this for clarity, adding the feycraft template to a whip or a rapier, does not allow you to use it without weapon finesse does it?

Basically what it says up top, if you wanna to ranged combat but it isn't your main thing is precise shot still needed or can you afford to wait until you can afford the enchant?

Heres an example
If you were the parties Skillmonkey/Spellcaster/face
Which feats would make more sense?
Force of Personality and Sociable Personality
or
Pointblank shot and precise shot?

Because on one hand if you're doing anything with archery you should make sure your as accurate as possible right?
on the other hand you can just not shoot people when they are in melee so...idk.

Would having both of them be redundant?

To anyone that isn't going for crossbow sniper? and if not then why?

Assuming you plan to multiclass and the classes you go through won't progress sneak attack, which would be more beneficial in the long run?
a 1d6 sneak attack die fueled by the craven feat, or the bonus feats?

All the guides i look into about this enchant say its good, however if you were gonna be a Dedicated archer you would have honestly gotten the feat, and if you weren't you probably have many other things you would want to do Plus by the time you do get it you probably already pelted your allies with arrows by this point. So does this enchant come off as redundant or is there something I'm missing?

When i first looked at this spell like everyone i thought it was broken in what you could do with it...but i go back now and i think its not only OP its flat out overkill.
If you were a person who was interested in bluffing anyway you would probably have enough in the skill where this would be unneccesary. And the only time it would be useful is in doing something like convincing the BBEG that he's actually a paragon of good, and no dm in their right mind would allow that unless they just wanted to see how much you could screw with everything. So its OP if allowed to do crazy things and overkill if not.

Is this accurate?