Author Topic: Look at this thing I found in Pathfinder! The bad feats/spells/etc thread  (Read 60497 times)

Offline Power

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • **
  • Posts: 240
  • Rolling a boulder up a hill
    • View Profile
New feat courtesy of Planar Adventures!
Quote
PEACE OF MIND (CONDUIT)
Source Planar Adventures pg. 31
The blissful peace of Nirvana is never more than a thought away from your mind.

Prerequisites: Knowledge (planes) 3 ranks.

Benefit: As an immediate action when you fail a saving throw against an emotion, fear, or pain effect, you can ignore the effect and instead become dazed for an amount of time equal to twice the duration of the original effect. Any nonlethal damage you would have taken from the original effect is reduced to its minimum value (as though a 1 had been rolled on all dice). You cannot activate this ability if you are currently dazed.

You can use this feat’s benefit once per day, plus an additional time per day for every 5 ranks you have in Knowledge (planes).

I think the only good use of this is against spells with instantaneous durations or if you somehow develop daze immunity. There might be a few cases where the regular condition is worse than daze (confusion?), but even then the doubled duration makes it a dubious proposition. For the most part this feat's effect is much worse than what that spell was going to do to you.

Offline ketaro

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3853
  • I'm always new!
    • View Profile
I'd rather be panicked and escaping danger than dazed and being murdered uncontested  :lol

Offline Raineh Daze

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9517
  • Less Angry Than Before
    • View Profile
Wow, that's impressively stupid.
Still short tempered.

Offline linklord231

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3326
  • The dice are trying to kill me
    • View Profile
Oh, and there's a limited number of uses per day.  Not that you'd survive the first use anyway  :lmao
I'm not arguing, I'm explaining why I'm right.

Offline SorO_Lost

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 7046
  • I'll kill you before you're born.
    • View Profile
Oh, and there's a limited number of uses per day.
Well you wouldn't want it to be overpowered right?
Would you die if you jumped from my perceived ego to your IQ? - Is 15secs of confirmation bias a goal post worth arguing for? - Ever asked a "victim" what they did to deserve it? - Are the words teen, SJW, & liberal synonyms? - "Only Sith deals in absolutes" contains a misspelled word.

Offline Keldar

  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 922
  • What's this button do?
    • View Profile
At least it actually does something.  That thing is incredibly stupid, but it does do it!

Offline Power

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • **
  • Posts: 240
  • Rolling a boulder up a hill
    • View Profile
There's an open argument to be had whether it would've been better if it didn't do anything at all though. Using it seems much worse than not using it.

Offline Maelphaxerazz

  • Full Member
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: over 9000
    • View Profile
There is at least a couple of cases where it might be useful: Phantasmal Killer and Weird are Fear effects, and being dazed is better than dying instantly.

Still an awful feat, of course.

Offline Power

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • **
  • Posts: 240
  • Rolling a boulder up a hill
    • View Profile
Those were the exact spells I was referring to when I spoke of spells with instantaneous duration, but it's an open question as technically speaking effects with a duration of instantaneous are interpreted to be permanent effects.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11315
    • View Profile
Those were the exact spells I was referring to when I spoke of spells with instantaneous duration, but it's an open question as technically speaking effects with a duration of instantaneous are interpreted to be permanent effects.

Eh, even then a 6th level paladin could remove it and since the feat isn't a curse, disease, or poison the removal is permanent.

Offline Power

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • **
  • Posts: 240
  • Rolling a boulder up a hill
    • View Profile
Maybe so, but failing saves vs Phantasmal Killer is pretty hard, unless they really cheesed DCs and added a Persistent Spell metamagic on top, not to mention Pathfinder GMs tend to never use that kind of ability on players. This isn't the old D&D where you throw around save-or-die, permanent level drain, and others kinds of serious hazards at players. Today's Pathfinder GMs will fudge dice if they're worried their monster has been critting too often.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11315
    • View Profile
I didn't say that it made the feat good, I just said that being permanently dazed isn't something to worry about.   :p

Also we have different kinds of Pathfinder GMs.

Offline SorO_Lost

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 7046
  • I'll kill you before you're born.
    • View Profile
Also we have different kinds of Pathfinder GMs.
It's probably a generational gap.

Remember Gygax's love of murderous dungeons that killed players for arbitrary reasons?
By 3rd, the Red Hand of Doom simply penalized players for not keeping up with everything.
And by 5th, players hands are held. They can completely skip fights or even trivialize campaign bosses (Tiamat takes like five rounds to use her stat block, most of ToEE's guys auto die vs disarm), heck one of the best weapons in 5th is obtained by not killing someone. >.>
Would you die if you jumped from my perceived ego to your IQ? - Is 15secs of confirmation bias a goal post worth arguing for? - Ever asked a "victim" what they did to deserve it? - Are the words teen, SJW, & liberal synonyms? - "Only Sith deals in absolutes" contains a misspelled word.

Offline Raineh Daze

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 9517
  • Less Angry Than Before
    • View Profile
heck one of the best weapons in 5th is obtained by not killing someone. >.>

I see nothing wrong with that one, particularly thrown against the unexpected. Player murder isn't always the cruellest option. :p
Still short tempered.

Offline Power

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • **
  • Posts: 240
  • Rolling a boulder up a hill
    • View Profile
Re: Look at this thing I found in Pathfinder! The bad feats/spells/etc thread
« Reply #174 on: September 28, 2018, 06:01:52 AM »
Found another feat in Villain Codex
Quote
POSITION OF STRENGTH
Source Villain Codex pg. 188
You know how to press your advantage when negotiating with noncombatants.

Prerequisites: Intimidate 5 ranks.

Benefit: As long as you are wielding one or more weapons with which you are proficient, you gain a +4 bonus on Intimidate checks against unarmed creatures, which doesn’t stack with Intimidating Prowess. Additionally, if you successfully use Intimidate to demoralize an unarmed creature, that creature becomes shaken for as long as you continue to be armed and they continue not to be, to a maximum of 1 minute. Creatures with natural attacks, or whose unarmed strikes deal lethal damage, are considered to be armed for the purposes of this feat.

Another one of those "here's a feat to allow you to do what the GM would've let you do without the feat before it existed" additions that only serves as a nerf to make things worse.

Offline zook1shoe

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4535
  • Feeling the Bern
    • View Profile
Re: Look at this thing I found in Pathfinder! The bad feats/spells/etc thread
« Reply #175 on: October 01, 2018, 08:15:05 PM »
75% of the things you face aren't even affected by the feat, not including the stuff immune to mind affecting
add me on Steam- zook1shoe
- All Spells
- playground

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11315
    • View Profile
Re: Look at this thing I found in Pathfinder! The bad feats/spells/etc thread
« Reply #176 on: October 01, 2018, 10:24:47 PM »
Found another feat in Villain Codex
Quote
POSITION OF STRENGTH
Source Villain Codex pg. 188
You know how to press your advantage when negotiating with noncombatants.

Prerequisites: Intimidate 5 ranks.

Benefit: As long as you are wielding one or more weapons with which you are proficient, you gain a +4 bonus on Intimidate checks against unarmed creatures, which doesn’t stack with Intimidating Prowess. Additionally, if you successfully use Intimidate to demoralize an unarmed creature, that creature becomes shaken for as long as you continue to be armed and they continue not to be, to a maximum of 1 minute. Creatures with natural attacks, or whose unarmed strikes deal lethal damage, are considered to be armed for the purposes of this feat.

Another one of those "here's a feat to allow you to do what the GM would've let you do without the feat before it existed" additions that only serves as a nerf to make things worse.

To be fair, I wouldn't grant ad-hoc bonuses for trying to intimidate someone just because they're unarmed unless against someone with only NPC classes.  Adventurer's shouldn't be easily intimidated automatically just because they don't happen to be armed.

Offline zook1shoe

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4535
  • Feeling the Bern
    • View Profile
Re: Look at this thing I found in Pathfinder! The bad feats/spells/etc thread
« Reply #177 on: October 01, 2018, 10:35:07 PM »
Agreed
add me on Steam- zook1shoe
- All Spells
- playground

Offline Nanashi

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • I'm new!
    • View Profile
Re: Look at this thing I found in Pathfinder! The bad feats/spells/etc thread
« Reply #178 on: November 02, 2018, 09:41:01 PM »
Let's see on Peace of Mind...
It doesn't do anything to (Mind-Affecting) stuff, which would actually be usable (not good, but usable) since "stay there useless" is still better than "kill your friends".

Uh... Magical traps? You can generally afford to wait those out. Too bad Sepia Snake Sigil would be worse (you're inactive twice as long but still need to eat) and for some reason, conjuration (creation) (and Temporal Stasis with the same effect is transmutation.). I recall at least one Phantasmal Killer trap in an AP, but even that causes issues (what's twice instant?).

Edit: Found a real stinker: Vestment of the Champion. Personal only magic vestment at a reduced level for Paladin is a reasonable idea, but it's minutes/level instead of hours (not even 10 mins/level!). When you first get it it's a mere +1 to AC (+2 if you have magical knack) that doesn't stack with existing magic armor (which you should have by level 7). At hours per level it would at least make enemy anti-Paladins slightly more durable (If he has a shield and cast it twice that's +4 AC without giving the party loot), but at minutes it's useless.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:08:00 AM by Nanashi »