1
D&D 3.5 and Pathfinder / Re: Forcecage - balancing? + Checking some wiz questions (p2)
« on: June 21, 2013, 01:46:14 AM »
Nota Bene: Acid Arrow is not an Evocation.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Also, linklord, an argument containing a fallacy does not necessitate a false conclusion. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy
It doesn't necessitate a false conclusion, but it's still an invalid argument. And if that's the only reason you have to believe something...
Think back to your entire argument on you leave an Encounter by not being in one. It's built on the concept if you are not one, then you can only be the other. Deities & uniques are under no Compulsion from Gate, so then by the same logical everyone else it. YEah, you should know where that can go form there.
Does the simplicity of eliminating the tag really make that option more attractive than just shuffling to which skills the tag applies? I don't see that it does.
Because had I not said that there are skills like UMD, people would have seen fit to argue about those skills that would require formal training.
Because had I not said that it would be easier to remove the tag all-together, then it would just start a list of which skills are or are not deserving of that tag, that would then turn to argumentation about which skills do or do not belong on said list.
Because by saying it both ways myself, I get to have my cake and eat it too, while you all go and argue about cows for five more pages.