1
Min/Max 3.x / Re: Girallon's blessing
« on: August 21, 2014, 03:54:11 PM »
This exact question came up in the campaign I'm dm'ing. I ruled that a the blessing (note it's just a level 3 spell) wasn't intended to basically double someone's attacks even though it isn't clear in the reprinted version. Using the thought that doubling attacks allowed for a level 3 spell, plus looking at the 3.0 text as a possible guiding thought for how the spell was intended, that's how I came to my ruling. I did however allow the dual wielding of two handed weapons, but, I wasn't going to allow the wielding of 4 war maces which is what the PC wanted with independent attack rolls for each.