Author Topic: Optimizing less effective combat styles  (Read 96568 times)

Offline SorO_Lost

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7197
  • Banned
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #180 on: November 25, 2011, 12:17:23 AM »
+5 inherent bonus to all stats? 137.5k a pop, so you're way over 760k.
+5 in all six is worthless, +4 in five on them on the other hand... Oh look, 687,000gp in Wealth. If I cared to spend more time in the stats maybe I could have avoided this, but meh who cares. Really, if everyone's biggest beef with my build comes down to "omg odd points and you have an extra +2 bonus you shouldn't have" I'd say job well done.

Edit: A question: Can you worship Shar and belong to the Monks of Dark Moon and still be a Saint?
You mean Shar the godess of thieves and secrets and not murder and mayhem like EVERYONE assumes because they see the letter E? I have no idea, why don't you ask Robin Hood the thief, or the three musketeers of treason, or Johan of Ark the mass murderer, or Saint Cipriano the warlock officially introduced by the same people that burned hundreds of girls at the stake because they might have practiced which craft, or really any other folk lore or novel on "heroes".

One intelligent enough to read her entry would know Shar's dogma nicely states you are forbidden strive to better your lot in life which fits nicely with a such a follower of humility. Also you don't have to be of the same alignment, her primary aspect (secrets) has nothing to do with alignment, can work with good for a good clause, and there no rules stating loss of the AFC for turning Good, you know. A huge fracking list of things you can pick though and deal with if you want to wage some debate on it. Maybe Invitae only swore to uphold humility to it's highest aspect (VoP) and to keep secrets of, well he is going to tell you. He never took his way of life to be a promise of sucess, and blah blah blah. Srsly, why and I flavoring out the PC to an insane clown like you?

I'm satisfied, hence why I posted it.

Offline JaronK

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ***
  • Posts: 381
  • I'm new!
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #181 on: November 25, 2011, 12:52:00 AM »
But Saint means being Exalted, and Exalted is stuck up even more righteous than Paladins good.  I could easily see plenty of good characters that use thievery and secrets... Robin Hood is a great example.  But Exalted?  I dunno.

I like Carnivore's thing.  And that many attacks might actually trigger ToGI sometimes.  I guess run it through the SGT or something like that to see how well it does in a stock standard kick in the door sort of game (the sort of game these guys are designed for)?  Slaughtering everything wholesale isn't needed... the only question is whether you can contribute effectively.

JaronK

Offline SorO_Lost

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7197
  • Banned
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #182 on: November 25, 2011, 02:32:13 AM »
But Saint means being Exalted, and Exalted is stuck up even more righteous than Paladins good.  I could easily see plenty of good characters that use thievery and secrets... Robin Hood is a great example.  But Exalted?  I dunno.
I don't think Robin Hood is a good example of "sainthood", but he is a better example than Cipriano who was awarded sainthood. But I digress. Flavor aside there really isn't a notation of Shar ban hammering you for trading her in so let's go with that before we devolve into religion bashing; even if we keep to fiction like Pelor the Burning Hate.

And I did screw up with the ability array, I edited in the mention using PB36 because I was thinking 14 all for the base and wrote in +5 tomes even though the odd point is worthless. That is the mistake I'll admit to but I'm too lazy to fix. Hell reduce the Con if it makes you happy, someone forgot to list HP too *whistles innocently*

Also, trivial consideration. Paying a spellcasting to cast wish on you is 24,250gp cheaper than buying all the Tomes which is almost enough savings to Wish for another bonus. Buy 26 and the 27th is free? What a lame bargain >.>

Offline carnivore

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • I'm new! sort of
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #183 on: November 25, 2011, 05:56:25 AM »
when you pay for a spellcaster to cast Wish for you .... it is indeed cheaper, but not that much...exa:

(click to show/hide)

so assuming 17th lvl Wizard casting Wish =
Caster level x 90 gp = 17 x 90 = 1530gp
+extra cost for XP value(5000XP x 5gp =25000gp)

Total Cost = 1530+ 25000 =  26530gp for a single +1 Inherent as opposed to the cost of a +1 Tome =27500gp .


970gp savings per point of Inherent Bonus


 :D

Offline Tshern

  • The Clown Prince of Crime
  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 1245
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #184 on: November 25, 2011, 07:50:22 AM »
+5 in all six is worthless, +4 in five on them on the other hand... Oh look, 687,000gp in Wealth. If I cared to spend more time in the stats maybe I could have avoided this, but meh who cares. Really, if everyone's biggest beef with my build comes down to "omg odd points and you have an extra +2 bonus you shouldn't have" I'd say job well done.
I would say that too. I quite like that build of yours.

Edit: A question: Can you worship Shar and belong to the Monks of Dark Moon and still be a Saint?
You mean Shar the godess of thieves and secrets and not murder and mayhem like EVERYONE assumes because they see the letter E? I have no idea, why don't you ask Robin Hood the thief, or the three musketeers of treason, or Johan of Ark the mass murderer, or Saint Cipriano the warlock officially introduced by the same people that burned hundreds of girls at the stake because they might have practiced which craft, or really any other folk lore or novel on "heroes".[/quote]
I was just wondering if there was an official ruling about that. Or if the sect the Monk needs to belong to has prerequisites. I don't know where to read about it, so I decided to ask. Please, have a chill pill.

Quote
One intelligent enough to read her entry would know Shar's dogma nicely states you are forbidden strive to better your lot in life which fits nicely with a such a follower of humility. Also you don't have to be of the same alignment, her primary aspect (secrets) has nothing to do with alignment, can work with good for a good clause, and there no rules stating loss of the AFC for turning Good, you know. A huge fracking list of things you can pick though and deal with if you want to wage some debate on it. Maybe Invitae only swore to uphold humility to it's highest aspect (VoP) and to keep secrets of, well he is going to tell you. He never took his way of life to be a promise of sucess, and blah blah blah. Srsly, why and I flavoring out the PC to an insane clown like you?
Again, reach for the chill pill jar.

Also, did you consider the Hit and Run Fighter?
Pian unohtuu aika ja tila
Ja nahkapeitto ja syyllisyys
Ja rauenneilla kasvoilla
Viipyy muiston pysyvyys

Offline skydragonknight

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 2660
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #185 on: November 25, 2011, 09:19:29 AM »
Tshern and his chill pills. Not everyone here is into substance abuse.
Hmm.

Offline Tshern

  • The Clown Prince of Crime
  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 1245
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #186 on: November 25, 2011, 10:56:14 AM »
Tshern and his chill pills. Not everyone here is into substance abuse.
Really? Would you care for a pill?
Pian unohtuu aika ja tila
Ja nahkapeitto ja syyllisyys
Ja rauenneilla kasvoilla
Viipyy muiston pysyvyys

Offline SorO_Lost

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 7197
  • Banned
    • View Profile
Re: Optimizing less effective combat styles
« Reply #187 on: November 25, 2011, 06:25:48 PM »
Tshern and his chill pills. Not everyone here is into substance abuse.
Drugs are just the start of things, wait till he has two boats, you're on one, and you wonder just whos remote you have.

Also, did you consider the Hit and Run Fighter?
Nope, I don't know Fighter AFCs. Only reason I took levels in it was for the Feats and Psychic Fighter is off limits.