Author Topic: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)  (Read 31436 times)

Offline geniussavant

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1726
  • Neither genius nor savant, mostly just confused
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #20 on: December 06, 2013, 08:41:35 PM »
The magyk touched looks pretty interesting, especially if you can combine it with magic in the blood. Revenant looks decent too depending on the picked harrowing.

As for your lineages, I would diverse them as much as possible.
Smile beautiful. It's not as bad as you think.
I usually post from my phone. Please excuse any typos. I swear, they're the phone's fault.

Offline zook1shoe

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Feeling the Bern
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #21 on: December 06, 2013, 08:55:56 PM »
i must be blind, how are we doing ability scores? 32pt?
add me on Steam- zook1shoe
- All Spells
- playground

Offline geniussavant

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1726
  • Neither genius nor savant, mostly just confused
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #22 on: December 06, 2013, 09:13:00 PM »
Yeah, iirc
Smile beautiful. It's not as bad as you think.
I usually post from my phone. Please excuse any typos. I swear, they're the phone's fault.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #23 on: December 06, 2013, 10:01:05 PM »
The magyk touched looks pretty interesting, especially if you can combine it with magic in the blood. Revenant looks decent too depending on the picked harrowing.

As for your lineages, I would diverse them as much as possible.

Since my bloodlines come from class abilities I doubt that Magic in the Blood would apply to them although that could be ruled upon.

For the lineages I'll either diversify and be versatile or find a niche I want to fill and go for it.  I haven't decided.

Offline zook1shoe

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Feeling the Bern
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #24 on: December 07, 2013, 01:37:49 AM »
i had mentioned not using the two-weapon fighting kensai ability, but more towards a two-handed single weapon style or even a one-handed weapon and nothing in offhand. what sort of feats should i look at?

maybe?
1- Weapon Focus (any one)
4- Weapon Specialization
8- Greater Weapon Focus
12- Greater Weapon Specialization
18- Weapon Supremacy
add me on Steam- zook1shoe
- All Spells
- playground

Offline FireInTheSky

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3870
  • "Insight is the sudden cessation of stupidity."
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #25 on: December 07, 2013, 01:47:34 AM »
I'm also having second thoughts about my choice of class. :-\ Since it seems that Avenging Sevenfold might be dead, what would you think about me taking this guy and modifying him for this campaign? Pretty much just needs a refluff and an extra level...
Alignment might be an issue? Looks okay in general though.
Specifically, I'm a bit concerned about the fact that it says he's NG, but murdered one person and was after another.
A redone background, alignment, and flaws were mainly what I meant by the highlighted part. (Still WIP)

Offline geniussavant

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1726
  • Neither genius nor savant, mostly just confused
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #26 on: December 07, 2013, 09:22:35 AM »
1- Weapon Focus (any one)
4- Weapon Specialization
8- Greater Weapon Focus
12- Greater Weapon Specialization
18- Weapon Supremacy

Due to the house rules we are using, weapon focus grants the benefit of everything else on that list but weapon supremacy, at the appropriate level of course.
Smile beautiful. It's not as bad as you think.
I usually post from my phone. Please excuse any typos. I swear, they're the phone's fault.

Offline Quillwraith

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #27 on: December 07, 2013, 09:51:06 AM »
PH2 has some other feats like that I think, if it's what you're looking for. We do seem to need some out of combat utility, too. Maybe a [wizard] feat?

A redone background, alignment, and flaws were mainly what I meant by the highlighted part. (Still WIP)
Ah, alright then.

Offline Quillwraith

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #28 on: December 11, 2013, 05:36:01 PM »
[Periodic what's up / bump]

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #29 on: December 11, 2013, 05:39:47 PM »
Still thinking about that third bloodline.  I'll just grab something that looks interesting, everything else will get done quickly.

Edit: I think I might go with this one.

Offline geniussavant

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1726
  • Neither genius nor savant, mostly just confused
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #30 on: December 11, 2013, 08:50:51 PM »
I'm just checking in. My charcter's done.
Smile beautiful. It's not as bad as you think.
I usually post from my phone. Please excuse any typos. I swear, they're the phone's fault.

Offline FireInTheSky

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3870
  • "Insight is the sudden cessation of stupidity."
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #31 on: December 16, 2013, 01:10:57 AM »
I think Qoden is now updated except for background. And just confirming that we have no starting gear, correct?

Offline Quillwraith

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #32 on: December 16, 2013, 03:49:42 PM »
Correct. You will, gowever, be able to acquire some shortly.



Risada says he's not going to play. (Bye...). Still haven't heard form Xaotic.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2013, 03:51:38 PM by Quillwraith »

Offline zook1shoe

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Feeling the Bern
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #33 on: December 16, 2013, 10:07:21 PM »
@Quill
how about feats like... since many of these feats should be combined together

(click to show/hide)
add me on Steam- zook1shoe
- All Spells
- playground

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #34 on: December 17, 2013, 11:25:32 AM »
Progress report: I've got my bloodlines done so that's the biggest part of my sheet taken care of.  I also have the flu so progress is slow.

Offline Quillwraith

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #35 on: December 17, 2013, 07:43:46 PM »
No hurry. Hope you get well  :)

Offline zook1shoe

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Feeling the Bern
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #36 on: December 18, 2013, 12:47:47 PM »
 ^^
  | |
my question?
add me on Steam- zook1shoe
- All Spells
- playground

Offline Quillwraith

  • Honorary Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #37 on: December 18, 2013, 07:42:49 PM »
Don't see why not. What book's Exhausting Defense from?

Offline geniussavant

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1726
  • Neither genius nor savant, mostly just confused
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #38 on: December 18, 2013, 11:22:25 PM »
Dragon 345 if I'm not mistaken
Smile beautiful. It's not as bad as you think.
I usually post from my phone. Please excuse any typos. I swear, they're the phone's fault.

Offline zook1shoe

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Feeling the Bern
    • View Profile
Re: The conversation that is not by the fictional people (OOC)
« Reply #39 on: December 19, 2013, 11:57:34 AM »
thx

Dragon #345 (pg 91) its a tactical fighter feat that is related to slowly fatiguing/exhausting a foe

Killing Blow is in the Planescape ch4 pdf for feats
« Last Edit: December 19, 2013, 12:01:15 PM by zook1shoe »
add me on Steam- zook1shoe
- All Spells
- playground