It may be unfortunate that folks refer to generic builds to explain a small number of combos or interactions,
Do they? Just poked around on google for some hits on some randomly tried build terms. +1 Girlfriend (0 minmax, 2 gitp), Bardblade (41 minmax, 439 gitp), Cheater of Mystra (47 hits minmax, 407 hits gitp), Easy Bake Wizard (101 minmax, 2,860 gitp), Murderhobo (64 minmax, 971 gitp), & Rainbow Warsnake (8 minmax, 420 gitp). And pretty sure that +1 Girlfriend results confirm my original statement on why some of the submissions were suggested.
But it also explains the differences in our view points. A person form GitP, compiling GitP's terms, from GitP threads, would see an apparent value whereas not only would I see very little. Likewise because the community doesn't actually use them there is a choice between encouraging usage of them to complicate matters and the need for extra reference guides or encourage the already established seldom use to try and use them a little less for clear text. I'm obviously in favor of the latter.
However, there could be a such thing as a "A Minmaxer's Guide to Understanding GitP" and I think being a little whimsical and Crocodile Hunter themed with it would be appropriate but that's up to whom ever wants to write it. And it would be helpful since, as we can see, GitP does overly use those terms in their guides.