Author Topic: [Discussion] The Nameless discussion thread  (Read 89403 times)

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #160 on: July 18, 2012, 10:40:22 PM »
The more I think about it the more I realize that I don't really want to play an Anchorite, I just did because I felt like the group needs some kind of out of combat healing...

Offline Garryl

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 4515
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #161 on: July 18, 2012, 11:03:17 PM »
The game is a mid-level game in a high magic setting. Out of combat healing is called "Wand of Lesser Vigor". Failing that, spend a circle selection and two feats on Circle Focus + Spellshape Aura (Natural Balance) as long as you're a spellshaper and don't lose more than 1 full shaper level. Technically, you don't even need access to Natural Balance (the wordings of Circle Focus and Spellshape Aura don't actually require you to know anything of the circle you select), but I think that's an oversight.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #162 on: July 18, 2012, 11:10:58 PM »
I'm sure as hell not going to be able to use wands even if I'm not an Anchorite, so if somebody else is going to be UMD'ing it they should speak up.   :p

Also, if I'm not an Anchorite I'm not taking Natural Balance.  I'm just not a big fan of the circle.

Offline VennDygrem

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4587
  • Exceptionally Average
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #163 on: July 18, 2012, 11:16:58 PM »
I've got full ranks in UMD and Cha as my main spellshaping stat. If we want to pitch in on a wand or two, I can probably cast from it sufficiently. :)

What, other than Dragonheart Adept, would you play? If it's particularly important to you to play DhA, I could always lose it in favor of something else, though that'll mean hefty rebuilding on my part as well.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2012, 11:18:47 PM by VennDygrem »

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #164 on: July 19, 2012, 01:12:10 PM »
No, you go ahead and play the Dragonheart Adept.  I'm happy playing a ranged character.  I've just decided that I'm very meh on the buffing theme that I made myself go after. 

I want to go either Elemental Adept or Spellshot Marksman.  I haven't decided which.  I guess I could go Natural Balance with Spellshot Marksman if we need me to for healing purposes.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #165 on: July 19, 2012, 06:04:53 PM »
No input?  Should I just make something and stop worrying about out of combat healing altogether (and hope somebody wants to spend money on wands)?

Offline VennDygrem

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4587
  • Exceptionally Average
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #166 on: July 19, 2012, 07:14:57 PM »
Don't worry about the out of combat healing, in my opinion. If we all pool in a little gold, we can afford one or two wands easily.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2012, 11:25:10 PM by VennDygrem »

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #167 on: July 19, 2012, 08:39:11 PM »
Hmm, then do I want Elemental Adept or Spellshot Marksman.....

Offline VennDygrem

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4587
  • Exceptionally Average
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #168 on: July 19, 2012, 10:52:45 PM »
I'm not finding myself terribly impressed with Spellshot Marksman. Sure, it can do a lot of damage, potentially, but it doesn't feel all that impressive overall otherwise. Maybe I just didn't read it correctly, but it seems sort of boring to me. *shrug*


Offline ShadowViper

  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 850
  • Don't go looking for snakes, you might find them.
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #169 on: July 19, 2012, 11:17:18 PM »
This might not be all that helpful heh, but play whichever you think you'll have the most fun with.
I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hara-Kiri rock! I need scissors! 61!

" 'Giving up' kills people. When a person refuses to give up, he earns the right to walk down the road of humanity." - Alucard

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #170 on: July 19, 2012, 11:36:31 PM »
I know I'll have more fun with the Elemental Adept, I was just wondering if we'd need the damage potential of the Spellshot Marksman.  I'll take that as a no.   :p

Offline ShadowViper

  • Hero Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 850
  • Don't go looking for snakes, you might find them.
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #171 on: July 19, 2012, 11:53:47 PM »
We might, not sure.

While it's nice to be concerned about what's best for the group, it's also important to play something you enjoy.

I too often worry about what works best for the group a bit too much.
I hear it's amazing when the famous purple stuffed worm in flap-jaw space with the tuning fork does a raw blink on Hara-Kiri rock! I need scissors! 61!

" 'Giving up' kills people. When a person refuses to give up, he earns the right to walk down the road of humanity." - Alucard

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #172 on: July 20, 2012, 04:04:24 PM »
How much BFC does the group have currently?  I'm contemplating what would become a dedicated BFC spellshaper.

Offline Jackinthegreen

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 6176
  • I like green.
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #173 on: July 20, 2012, 04:20:52 PM »
How much BFC does the group have currently?  I'm contemplating what would become a dedicated BFC spellshaper.
I'm not entirely sure about ranged BFC, but my character is a dungeoncrash tripper with aptitude boomerang daze on a spiked chain.  Considering he does a minimum of 22ish damage on each swing that can go to 30ish with full power attack, chances are the daze will go through, though it doesn't work on undead since it's a fort save.  Bull rushes and trips still have a good chance to work and he can hopefully pick up Shock Trooper next level for the full tactical ubercharger goodness.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #174 on: July 20, 2012, 04:23:11 PM »
How much BFC does the group have currently?  I'm contemplating what would become a dedicated BFC spellshaper.
I'm not entirely sure about ranged BFC, but my character is a dungeoncrash tripper with aptitude boomerang daze on a spiked chain.  Considering he does a minimum of 22ish damage on each swing that can go to 30ish with full power attack, chances are the daze will go through, though it doesn't work on undead since it's a fort save.  Bull rushes and trips still have a good chance to work and he can hopefully pick up Shock Trooper next level for the full tactical ubercharger goodness.

Well alright then.   :p

I was contemplating going into this prestige class that focuses on locking down everything within 30' of me.  However, it looks like you've probably got that part covered.

Offline Jackinthegreen

  • DnD Handbook Writer
  • ****
  • Posts: 6176
  • I like green.
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #175 on: July 20, 2012, 04:30:56 PM »
Play what you want. :p  I don't mind if there's overlap, and my character would find the whole tentacle thing amusing and helpful.  Tripped targets are easier to smash after all, and Crash like smash.

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #176 on: July 20, 2012, 04:38:53 PM »
Play what you want. :p  I don't mind if there's overlap, and my character would find the whole tentacle thing amusing and helpful.  Tripped targets are easier to smash after all, and Crash like smash.

I want to play two things that aren't compatible.   :P

I need to investigate things....

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #177 on: July 20, 2012, 11:20:13 PM »
Alright Venn, now that I'm playing an Elemental Adept I need to know what circles you're going after. 

Offline VennDygrem

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4587
  • Exceptionally Average
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #178 on: July 21, 2012, 12:15:40 AM »
I've actually been going over the four primary circle choices myself to figure that out. Detereorating Corrosion is starting to look less enticing. It's the most damaging, and there are a lot of decent debuffs, but something is rubbing me the wrong way.

Searing Flame has some good effects like dazing and adding a good amount of damage to melee attacks, but only a couple of us will benefit from that much. I think I'll probably scratch this one off the list.

I like the formulae in Perfect Freeze, it's definitely a contender.

Shocking Current is off the list.

So far it seems to be down to Detereorating Corrosion or Perfect Freeze. Really not sure which to go with right now. :/

Offline Nanshork

  • Homebrew Reviewer
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 13401
    • View Profile
Re: The Nameless discussion thread
« Reply #179 on: July 21, 2012, 12:44:31 PM »
Well once you've got it figured out, let me know.  You get first dibs on elemental circles, I'll work with what's left.