C.J.: Post #20, thank you C.J. G.J. there.
S.O.: Post #21, so close, then you ended with "What can I say, he doesn't disappoint". Which is baiting again. I realize by reading through the thread to follow that he is really responsive to you baiting him, so do try to resist the urge. Also, in bringing up something other than just the Domain Wizard, especially when you yourself admit that you didn't have access to the material to which you were referring, that is a Straw-Man / Red Herring.
C.J.: Post #24 See, he baited you. You bit. It tainted what could have been an intellectual, constructive rules conversation, and turned it hostile. Hostility tends to make people miss each others point. Ignore him. You are a much better poster than is shown in #24. Just look at #20, nice and well reasoned, you explain where you think you are in the rules in a very clear point-v-counterpoint manner. In #24, not so much, because you've saturated it with snark re-aimed at S.O. Yes, he brought up rules that had no bearing on the conversation, that is either a red herring, or a straw-man. Ignore off topic debating, it distracts from the actual point.
@Cyclone Joker
I'll be blunt, I can forgive you. I don't have the
right to criticize someone falling for SorO's troll-baiting.
He got me good once. So much so that I was bouncing back and forth as to whether I was
Pissed at him, or myself, for days. Him for baiting me, or myself for falling for it. You see, I opened a thread, asking if something had been done right, and if it was balanced CO, or if it was imbalanced TO, going so far as to espouse that it was the former. I was dead, F***ing wrong. But instead of explaining why in a constructive manner, he... well, I'll let you
read the conversation yourself if you wish, just do
not rez that thread.
Nevertheless, choose one: ignore him entirely; try to read through to see where the logical points of what he writes are, then only engage him on those points; engage on all the points, just to clear them off of the debate's flow chart, but keep your head on your shoulders.
@ SorO_Lost
I've had a conversation with you before about introducing logical fallacies to your arguments. You did so here. We've discussed with one another before about doing research before posting, you full well admit you mentioned something when you couldn't have done such research.
Just. Plain. What. The. Fuck. Man?
Why you be trollin?
The sad thing is, I actually agree with a few of your points. But there is just no decorum to your debate. Try to keep things dialectic. You have proven yourself to be quite smart about some things, but you need to keep your ego in check, as well as your need to bait / troll.