S.O.: Post #21, so close, then you ended with "What can I say, he doesn't disappoint". Which is baiting again. I realize by reading through the thread to follow that he is really responsive to you baiting him, so do try to resist the urge. Also, in bringing up something other than just the Domain Wizard, especially when you yourself admit that you didn't have access to the material to which you were referring, that is a Straw-Man / Red Herring.
It's not baiting to me. As noted, I fully except a load of BS from him. Probable with that is, you think that's a bad thing. CJ probably does to, but who cares. My words, my message, my intent. If you haven't figured out by now all people in a debate are my entertainment then you never will.
Also I could not do research on CC, hey guess what? Not only did I never claim to quote the CC (only mentioned as I don't know the text of Domain Wizard within, only the SRDs), the only claim I put forth was the SRD's version says no. Because ALL of UA's Variants swap out their respected Class Features, either google it or look in the UA. See also the point of can't trade the same feature away twice which others (including your self) have agreed to.
The real problem is I come across like sandpaper covered in bees. Essentially, your own word filter need a SorO interpreter. As I have pointed out, bonus spells of X level is TO and easily argued as wrong, but learn to pick your battles and thus the main part I've really been hitting on is the Generalist Wizard + Domain Wizard + Versatile Spellcaster fails for a multitude of reasons but not simply because forgot a word.