Author Topic: Why is practically everyone against traps?  (Read 19471 times)

Offline Amechra

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4560
  • Thread Necromancy a specialty
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #60 on: February 02, 2013, 02:38:14 AM »
I'm remembering someone pointing out that Improvised Weapons break on a natural 1, and that there are certain conditions under which people count as objects...
"There is happiness for those who accept their fate, there is glory for those that defy it."

"Now that everyone's so happy, this is probably a good time to tell you I ate your parents."

Offline linklord231

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3352
  • The dice are trying to kill me
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #61 on: February 02, 2013, 02:40:50 AM »
I'm remembering someone pointing out that Improvised Weapons break on a natural 1, and that there are certain conditions under which people count as objects...

Do you recall where you heard that?  I've never heard of any official rules where something worse than a miss happens on a natural 1 on an attack roll.
I'm not arguing, I'm explaining why I'm right.

Offline Amechra

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4560
  • Thread Necromancy a specialty
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #62 on: February 02, 2013, 02:54:56 AM »
It was like two years ago; I'll see if I can find what it was I saw...
"There is happiness for those who accept their fate, there is glory for those that defy it."

"Now that everyone's so happy, this is probably a good time to tell you I ate your parents."

Offline ImperatorK

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2313
  • Chara did nothing wrong.
    • View Profile
    • Kristof Imperator YouTube Channel
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #63 on: February 02, 2013, 05:13:28 AM »
Drunken Master's Improvised Weapons class feature.
Magic is for weaklings.

Alucard: "*snif snif* Huh? Suddenly it reeks of hypocrisy in here. Oh, if it isn't the Catholic Church. And what's this? No little Timmy glued to your crotch. Progress!"
My YT channel - LoL gameplay

Offline InnaBinder

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
  • Onna table
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #64 on: February 02, 2013, 07:21:21 AM »
I'm remembering someone pointing out that Improvised Weapons break on a natural 1, and that there are certain conditions under which people count as objects...

Do you recall where you heard that?  I've never heard of any official rules where something worse than a miss happens on a natural 1 on an attack roll.
I recall a similar rule coming up in a discussion about Drunken Master.
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics.  Even if you win, you're still retarded.

shugenja handbook; talk about it here

Offline linklord231

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3352
  • The dice are trying to kill me
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #65 on: February 02, 2013, 11:54:12 AM »
Huh, interesting.  I can see why they did that (so a Drunken Master doesn't get too attached to a particular improvised weapon, blah blah blah), but it sets a lousy precedent.  Also, you could just hand the One Ring to a drunken master instead of trekking all the way to Mt Doom, and he'll have destroyed it for you within 2 minutes.
I'm not arguing, I'm explaining why I'm right.

Offline InnaBinder

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
  • Onna table
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #66 on: February 02, 2013, 01:29:06 PM »
Huh, interesting.  I can see why they did that (so a Drunken Master doesn't get too attached to a particular improvised weapon, blah blah blah), but it sets a lousy precedent.  Also, you could just hand the One Ring to a drunken master instead of trekking all the way to Mt Doom, and he'll have destroyed it for you within 2 minutes.
I think that's more a function of Unintended Consequences and not having an adequate, categorical definition of "Improvised Weapon" than anything.
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics.  Even if you win, you're still retarded.

shugenja handbook; talk about it here

Offline Amechra

  • Epic Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 4560
  • Thread Necromancy a specialty
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #67 on: February 02, 2013, 03:58:12 PM »
Drunken Master + Unconscious Monster = ???
"There is happiness for those who accept their fate, there is glory for those that defy it."

"Now that everyone's so happy, this is probably a good time to tell you I ate your parents."

Offline InnaBinder

  • Legendary Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1244
  • Onna table
    • View Profile
Re: Why is practically everyone against traps?
« Reply #68 on: February 02, 2013, 04:21:15 PM »
Drunken Master + Unconscious Monster = ???
Not even unconscious.  Drunken Master + Grappled Foe = (presumably) accidental hilarity
Arguing on the internet is like running in the Special Olympics.  Even if you win, you're still retarded.

shugenja handbook; talk about it here