So a friend of mine will be taking part in a campaign with a level range of 10-15 (unsure what level the gm will be going with). Be that as it may, any official material is available except for Psionics, since one of the players apparently had a bad experience with psionics and is vehemently against it being present in the game (i bet it was a thrallherd... ;p). Anyway, I figured the player can have something else to complain about, so i suggested JaronK's Binder/Archivist/Tainted Sorc/Anima Mage/Tene Apostate build.
With this said, assuming Tainted Sorcerer is off the table due to the taint mechanic not being used in the campaign, is it still worth it to stick to the build even without Tainted Sorcerer? Or would the character be better off going with something else if Tainted Sorcerer is a no-go? And if it is still a viable build, what would that 1 level be replaced with?
The main goal behind the character is to have as much flexibility as possible and maintain being powerful -without- being something like a wizard,druid,cleric or any other pure caster. And i figured binder + all divine spells in the game was pretty darn flexible and just different enough to be set apart from the aformentioned classes.
The campaign itself wont be combat heavy and instead focus more on RP, hence why we went with binder since binder has quite a lot of goodies from their vestiges that can aid in the role-playing aspects.