Guys, it's not bragging to tell people your IQ results when asked about it. 
When you have a relatively normal result, up to 140 (Which is considered exceptionally gifted, but not genius, just clearly above normal), it's generally not considered bragging. I mean, MENSA wants people with 140+, so up till then they consider you "normal". But people tend to frown on really high results(150+) because then it actually nearly auto-qualify you to be called a genius, at least on a purely intellectual level. Most people in the 150+ range tend to excel in one area above all others. Especially with REALLY high results(160+) that are close to what Einstein et al get, people think you're pretending to be smarter than you really are. ESPECIALLY on the internet, because e-pen size discussions nearly always include something in those lines to assert your "superiority" to your opponent.
So that's why people that rank really high generally keep that fact to themselves, and only really reveal it in person and to people that have already made out the fact that they are abnormally smart or REALLY good in one area. When someone already acknowledges you as a genius and actively asks for your IQ in person, it's not bad form to tell them. But it is bad form to reveal that online, on most cases.
But that's not the case here. We're here to reveal our scores, discuss about the mean scores of the group as a whole, and generally discuss the trend that people that play roleplaying games tend to have above average intelligence. And, actually, the more involved someone is with the "geek" or "nerdy" culture, the likelihood increases that they will be someone that's smarter than average. I'm sure there are all sorts of sociological and anthropological nuances to this.
Poll