If you're making an argument, it seems to be 'we should leave everything as it is now, or rather as it was some ambiguous time in the past, and not do anything because it can be interpreted as hypocrisy'. That or some really confusing attempt at trolling.
As opposed to the argument that you are endorsing, which seems to be "we should replace the old bigotry with new bigotry, because even though bigotry is bad we have good intentions and that makes it okay, and besides doing nothing can be interpreted as supporting the old bigotry". That, or some really confused attempt at confusing your inability to frame a functional rebuttal with trolling on someone else's part.
There's also the following:
Blacks are far, far more likely to get subjected to stop and frisk type laws than whites are, even though whites are more likely to be committing a crime or have illegal substances in their possession.
And yet crime by blacks soars when stop-and-frisk is eliminated. You know, the way it is happening in NYC.
It seems the right people are in fact being stopped and frisked.
Black receive harsher sentences across the board for committing the same offenses as white. A first time white offender normally gets probation, a black first time offender gets prison.
And women receive lighter sentences, particularly for sexual assault of children, than men. A woman having sex with a high school age teen gets probation, a man gets prison.
Of course part of the disparity is due to making the sentencing guidelines advisory rather than mandatory, which was something demanded by Democrats to end racism.
And it must be questioned as to just what judges are passing these sentences. Since most of the crime occurs in big cities which are Democratic stongholds, it would seem that it is Democratic judges that are demonstrating the most bias. This is compounded by the fact that 95% of cases never go to trial, and the sentences are essentially determined by the District Attorney's in the plea bargain, with said DA's again typically being Democrats.
Perhaps you should direct your complaints at the "progressives" in charge of those places.
Wrongful convictions that are overturned are far more likely to be those of black men as opposed to any other race.
Which would suggest that blacks are receiving more favorable attention on appeals.
Black children who misbehave in school get expelled or prosecuted in some states, or even physically restrained. White children get detention.
Black children are also misbehaving in significantly more violent ways in schools than white children.
In states, like California, where discipline of school children has been made a racial issue, violent misbehavior is up significantly.
Meanwhile, white children get suspended for eating pop tarts in the "wrong" way.
When the sentencing laws for harsher penalties were written, crack and heroin were seen as a problem affecting blacks. Now that whites are increasingly using them, there's a sudden movement for lessening the penalties.
If you want to go that route, when drug prohibition was begun it was done out of fear that whites were turning into addicts, and that simply could not be tolerated by "progressive" eugenics theories.
Maybe a massive revision of drug prohibition without a basis on pseudoscience is called for.
Where I live blacks were still being lynched well into the 90's, and a town north of me is such a KKK stronghold you have to be in the Klan to be a local businessman or a cop (or run for city government).
Where I live, Jews are still assassinated well into the 2000's, all too often in pogroms led by blacks under the direction of people like Al Sharpton.
Where I live, Hispanics control the politics of the county, and you have to be part of one of the their political machines to get approved for office.
Where I live, an overt communist who supported violent terrorists is Mayor, and with his black wife has perpetrated changes in law enforcement favorable to blacks, causing a dramatic surge in crime against blacks as well as whites.
You are either naive or willfully obtuse. It's also possible you've lead a sheltered life, but being from NY I doubt that.
If you think you have any standing to lecture me on the destructive effects of racial politics you are simply woefully mistaken.
